Post

@VaxControlGroup

@DrAseemMalhotra

More from @chrislittlewoo8

Chris Littlewood

@chrislittlewoo8

Oct 27

They injected your children for profit, status, greed, and power.

The harm, injuries, and deaths of children were mere collateral in their pursuit of personal gain.

IgG class switching, SV40 and the implications for your children.

A 🧵👇

1. COVID Infections Post-Injection:

Every child in the following study caught COVID after receiving the Pfizer injection.

COVID posed an extremely low risk to healthy children, making it unethical to inject them with an untested gene therapy.

2. IgG Class Switching and Immune System Damage

The study on children demonstrates significant IgG class switching with elevated IgG4 levels post-injection.

Read 19 tweets

Chris Littlewood

@chrislittlewoo8

Feb 23

A story about @RevolutApp

Going through my VAT return today, I noticed they had decided to take £750 per month in charges out of my account.

Worried, I contacted them.

The following screenshots of our conversation show how bad this is.

FYI I have held this account for a long time and never agreed to these changes.

So we move on with this ridiculous conversation, it’s taken hours

And more, they have taken £3000 but refuse to put it back

Read 11 tweets

Chris Littlewood

@chrislittlewoo8

Dec 13, 2023

A 🧵that scares me more than anything else. 👇

The slow release of the most terrifying information ever published by the BBC, couched in lies, platitudes & soothing language.

bbc.com/news/health-67…

Lie 1

“Covid vaccines given to millions of people could be fine-tuned for even greater accuracy, UK scientists say.”

No, what they really said is the injections have been exposed by independent scientific studies to do exactly what was hidden from Governments & the Public.

They hid this information at the trial stage, they knew about it before they gained EUA, they forged then results, they didn’t care.

They promise they can make changes to these injections to stop them doing what they are doing, but zero studies have been conducted.

Read 30 tweets

Chris Littlewood

@chrislittlewoo8

Nov 22, 2023

A 🧵about the explosive growth of Cancer in 14-44 years olds in the UK

Don’t bother trying to tell me this is all because we closed cancer screening for 4 months in early 2020.

That excuse just doesn’t wash anymore.

I dread to think what 2023 will show.👇

Turbo Cancer 59% Rise in 2022

Analysis of Excess Adjusted Death Rates from Malignant Neoplasms Without
Specification of Site

In the Figure (left) below we can observe that the excess deaths rates from malignant neoplasms without specification of site were close to zero in 2020, then rose to about +32% in 2021 and about +59% in 2022.

In terms of statistical significance of the excess deaths, we observe from the Figure (right) below that for cancers without specification of site, in 2020 the Z-score for adjusted death rates was low, which point to low statistical significance.

In 2021 the Z-score was about 3.1, which is a strong signal in statistical terms.

In 2022 the Z-score was close to 6, which is a very strong signal and indicates that the excess deaths from these cancers are statistically significant deviations from the 2010-2019 trend.

When looking at changes in the fraction of all deaths attributed to cancers without specification of site, we observe that the fraction of deaths from these cancers were slightly below trend in 2020 and at 13% above trend for 2021 (with low statistical significance).

In 2022 however, the fraction of deaths for these cancers jumped about 42%, with a Z-score of above 4, indicating very high statistical significance.

It appears that deaths from cancers without specification of site as a fraction of all deaths deviated significantly from prior trends in 2022.

Summary:

Our analysis shows that the excess deaths rates from malignant neoplasms without specification of site were close to zero in 2020, then rose to about +32% in 2021 and about +59% in 2022.

The excess mortality from malignant neoplasm without specification of site in 2021 and 2022 are highly statistically significant with Z-scores of 3.1 and close to 6, respectively. These are very strong signals, in particular for 2022.

These signals are corroborated by similar findings when measuring rises in the fraction of deaths from malignant neoplasms without specification of site relative to all other deaths with classified causes.

Breast Cancer 28% Rise in 2022

Analysis of Excess Adjusted Death Rates from Malignant Neoplasms of the Breast

In the Figure (left) below we can observe that the excess deaths rates from malignant neoplasms of the breast were -5% in 2020, then rose to about 12% in 2021 and about 28% in 2022.

In terms of statistical significance of the excess deaths, we observe from the Figure (right) that for breast cancers, the Z-score in 2020 was only about -2, which is not a strong negative signal but perhaps something worth investigating in further detail.

We speculate that perhaps the Covid-19 pandemic measures, lifestyle changes or misclassification of breast cancer deaths as Covid-19 deaths led to fewer breast cancer deaths.

When looking at changes in the fraction of all deaths attributed to breast cancers, we observe that breast cancer rates were about 12% lower, with a -4 Z-score which points to a strong effect and corroborates the previous observations.

Summary:

Our analysis shows that the excess deaths rates from malignant breast neoplasms were -5% in 2020, then rose to about +12% in 2021 and about +28% in 2022.

In 2021, the Z-score for adjusted death rates was close to 4.0 which is a strong signal.

In 2022 the Z-score rose to about 9.8, which is a very strong signal and indicates that the excess deaths from breast cancers are statistically significant deviations from the 2010-2019 trend.

These signals are corroborated by similar findings when measuring rises in the fraction of deaths from malignant neoplasms of the breast relative to all other deaths with classified causes.

Read 7 tweets

Chris Littlewood

@chrislittlewoo8

Oct 27, 2023

Excess Deaths. 🧵/📕

As promised here is the update after a face-to-face meeting with my MP Justin Madders @justinmadders the Shadow Minister (Future of Work), and the Shadow Minister (Employment Rights and Protections).

Meeting 27/10/2023 3 pm

Firstly, I would like to thank my MP for allowing me to speak in person; although the allocated slot was 20 minutes, this time period was extended.

This was a non-confrontational, cordial meeting in which, as posted previously, I had a set number of questions I wanted to ask.

Question A

What was his opinion on the information provided in Andrew Bridgen’s speech on UK excess deaths in the House of Commons on the 20th of October 2023?

He answered that “as I was aware he had attended, he had made significant notes and had already sent in a number of written questions in relation to the issues presented”

He said, “he was disappointed that throughout the evidence presented, there was still not a fully definable link between excess deaths and the injections”.

We both agreed that more evidence was coming to light on a daily basis.

At this point, he asked me for my opinion on excess deaths.

I responded that it would be naïve and foolish to blame every excess death on the injections and that a culmination of these and NPIs would have created the situation we currently face.

He asked for clarification on the meaning of NPI, which I explained was Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions, such as lockdowns and creating an NHS waiting list of nearly 7.6 million people.

In relation to the injections, I gave a basic overview of IgG3 switching to IgG4 and how repeat injections lowered the person's immune response.

I pointed out how IgG4 was positively utilised in transplants of organs such as kidneys and hearts to stop a person's natural immune system from rejecting the organ.

But described how this was creating issues with people becoming repeatedly infected with CV and the effects being worse.

I gave a specific example of “Shingles” a subject he appeared through his body language to have been made aware of.

I explained how shingles is the same dormant chicken pox virus that people caught as children, the natural immune system has already defeated this infection and learned to suppress it, it was only because of a weakened immune system we are seeing so many resurgence cases of shingles after the injections.

I also mentioned “Professor Dalglish” the famous cancer specialist and how he was witnessing cancer patients, specifically melanoma (his field) that had been in remission for years, to have the cancer return very aggressively after the Covid Injections.

Mr Madders made significant notes, he was not aware of IgG switching and its implications.

I then tried my best to explain the inclusion of SV40 into the the injections.

Mr Madders didn’t know what SV40 was or what an LNP was.

I tried my best to explain that the Simian Virus 40 promoter was added to the injection and enclosed in Liquid Nano Particles so that it could enter the cells in order for the body to start producing spike protein thus attempting to generate an immune response.

I stated that it was a known fact that SV40 was oncogenic, it creates cancers.

I described how the SV40 promoter was hidden in the details presented to the MHRA in the EUA submission as well as numerous medical regulatory bodies throughout the world.

I stated, that I believed a culmination of NPI’s IGG and SV40 are the primary cause for the excess deaths we are currently experiencing.

Lots of notes were taken down
Mr Madders then said, “I'm asking too many questions, let's get back to the questions you have”.

Question B

Do you think questions need to be asked and answered as to why so many people of all ages across the board are dying before their time?

Mr Madders answered categorically “YES”. He said, “he had already sent in a number of questions about this issue after the debate on the 20th”.

Question C

Do you have any information on the rate of excess mortality within your own constituency?

Mr Madders answered that “he did not”

To be quite honest, he looked like someone had hit him on the back of the head with a shovel, as to why he hadn’t thought of that.

“He said he wasn’t sure if the information was available at constituency level and that he would try and find out”.

I said I would also look for this information and if identified I would provide it.

Question D

What was your opinion of the Health Minister’s response to Mr Bridgen’s speech, when she stated that 93.6% of the population had received at least one injection; when everybody knows that the figures are fundamentally flawed?

He said “he was not aware that they were flawed and even so, surely the point she was trying to make was that a lot of people had taken the injection”.

I said this point was crucial to many of the things he believed.

The actual UK Population that has been injected including children of all ages was about 78% (I would email exact figures).

The Debate was about excess deaths across all age groups, changing the overall percentage on such a huge scale, massively distorts how the data is understood.

The same way in which you have repeatedly told me that based on these figures, taking the injection is the best form of defence.

When you look at that with a reduction to 78% the evidence changes dramatically.

More notes were taken down.

Question E

I know that you wanted to participate in the last adjournment debate, but because of lack of time, you were not afforded that opportunity.

Will you support Andrew Bridgen’s call for a 3-hour Back Bench Business Debate so that a full 3 hours can be allotted to discuss in greater detail what was identified in his speech?

Mr Madders responded with a resounding “NO”.

Before I could respond he said “I can’t, I’m not a back-bencher, I’m a Shadow Minister”.

Yep, I did feel a little foolish, but he said “he was having to respond to many people with the same reply”.

However, he immediately suggested that Mr Brigden could apply for a West Minister Halls debate that any MP could apply for and would last for 1.5 hours.

Interestingly, he also said he believed that Andrew would now have more than enough support to gain a Back Bench Business Debate.

I then asked if either of these debates managed to be scheduled, would he 1 attend and 2 participate?

He answered that “he would as long as no other emergency matters presented themselves”.

It isn’t possible to nail someone’s hat to the chair when the debate has not been scheduled and times have not been announced, however, I felt he gave an honest answer that he would both support, participate and engage.

For me, that’s a win.

Final question, I pre-ambled this with an explanation that I watched the whole set of debates live on the 20th and while Mr Madders was on his feet, he was asked by a Conservative MP, why he had supported all of the Government Mandates without and evidence, to which Mr Madders responded “that’s a bit rich coming from your side”.

I saw the glimmer of a parliamentarian in his eyes as he no doubt thought how did you expect me to answer?

Question F

Finally, how can you now justify supporting nearly every action the Government proposed without any risk/benefit analysis, now that the public enquiry has shown that every NPI has shown that every NPI has had a disastrous effect on society?

He said he would probably respond as he did in the House of Commons”, but he also said “Knowing what we know now, we would probably do it differently.

We were in a national crisis and it didn’t seem appropriate to fully challenge the Government, rather just support them in this crisis”.

He said, “We are not supplied with the same information as the Government, we are sent a list of recommendations by the Government and told the Science & Medical Establishment is recommending this, you should support it”.

He said, “If you check through Hansard, you will see we asked for information on a number of occasions relating to Government requirements that we were unsure of”.

I said, at the end of the day, the mistakes have to be owned up to, that Labour will win the next election because the Conservative party are in chaos, but if you don’t own the mistakes before the elections, the Conservatives will use that information as a weapon against you when they are in opposition.

(Notes taken, wide-eyed expression).

To conclude the meeting Mr Madders asked what I wanted.

I told him I and many others wanted to ensure that this could never happen again and that we had checks and balances put in place to ensure this disaster could never be repeated.

I told him that any type of national intervention must have a risk/benefit analysis before being considered.

I mentioned that all these checks and balances would be useless if the WHO get their way.

The meeting came to a close when he was reminded that he was late for his next appointment.

We shook hands and I asked if I could re-engage with additional information, to which he agreed.

I’m sure I have missed a few things in this post that were discussed, but I think I got the important bits down.

It's hard to keep notes, keep on track and maintain eye contact in order to read a person.

What do I think?

I think like the vast majority of the nation, he bought the line sold by the government and is now looking for real answers.

He’s in the invidious position of not only supporting the government but being a Shadow Minister who realises he’s been lied to and it has called into question all the things he stands for.

He says he will support an in-depth debate on excess deaths, he said he would attend the last meeting and did, he said she will support the next ones and participate.

I have written this to show how many of my fellow constituents and I have managed to get our MP to not only acknowledge their constituent's wishes but also to act on their behalf.

I hope others can use it to garner change with their own political representatives.

This in my opinion is what Direct Democracy is all about.

@Jikkyleaks I hope I managed my layman’s explanation correctly.

Read 9 tweets

Chris Littlewood

@chrislittlewoo8

Sep 7, 2023

A 🧵

Cowardice in Government.

Questions need to be asked.

If you think these questions are relevant, please tag in your local MP.

I’ll tag mine, even though the poltroon has blocked me. 👇

My local MP Justin Madders @justinmadders a coward in my opinion) sent a written question to the Department of Heath:

He tabled the following written Parliamentary Question on the 18th of July:

“Question:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what assessment he has made of the (a) causes of excess deaths in the last three years and (b) implications for his policies of those causes.”

Read 17 tweets

Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

Chris Littlewood

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

More from @chrislittlewoo8

Chris Littlewood

Chris Littlewood

Chris Littlewood

Chris Littlewood

Chris Littlewood

Chris Littlewood

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Send Email!