🧵 The British Democracy Illusion:

How the Royal Prerogative Keeps Power Beyond the Reach of the People 👇 Introduction

We are told that Britain is a democracy. That we vote for representatives who govern on our behalf. That Parliament is sovereign. That no major decisions are made without public accountability.

But this is, at best, a comforting illusion.

Behind the traditions, the rituals, and the televised debates lies a constitutional relic that makes a mockery of democratic principle.

It is called the Royal Prerogative, and it still governs how our country is run.

What Is the Royal Prerogative?

The Royal Prerogative is a set of powers once wielded by monarchs who ruled by divine right.

Today, those same powers are used by government ministers without the need for Parliament’s consent.
These powers include:

Signing treaties
Deploying troops
Appointing ministers and judges
Dissolving Parliament
Granting pardons
Controlling passports and citizenship
And more

Critically, the power to commit the UK to international agreements on matters as serious as public health, defence, or territorial sovereignty remains fully in the hands of ministers.

Parliament does not vote. The public does not consent. Yet the effects are profound and often irreversible.

1/
Did you vote for the WHO Pandemic Treaty?

Did you approve giving away UK territory?

Did you back a 12-year EU fishing deal?

No? Neither did Parliament.

This is how the Royal Prerogative is gutting UK democracy. 2/
The Royal Prerogative is a leftover from the days of kings and queens ruling by decree.

Today, government ministers use it in the monarch’s name to bypass the House of Commons, and they're using it more than ever.

🧵The WHO Pandemic Treaty is the most dangerous attack on British freedom you have never heard of.

And your MP will not vote on it.

Read this carefully. Then share it. 1) This treaty gives unelected officials at the World Health Organization sweeping powers to control how the UK handles pandemics, define what counts as “truth,” and ignore our Parliament entirely.

It is not a conspiracy theory. It is written in the treaty itself.

🚨 Integrity Matters. 🚨

Over the past five months, we’ve worked tirelessly to build a real grassroots movement for Reform UK in our constituencies. We believed in a party that stood for accountability, democracy, and real change.

Sadly, the actions of Reform UK’s leadership have made it impossible for us to continue in good conscience. When integrity is compromised, blind loyalty is not an option.

With deep regret, we—every officer in our branch—are resigning with immediate effect. Our full statement explains why.

(Read the letter below) ⬇️ @ZiaYusufUK @Nigel_Farage @reformparty_uk @TiceRichard @LeeAndersonMP_ @RupertLowe10 Date and Time: Friday, March 14, 2025, 17:10 GMT

Dear Mr Yusuf,

Integrity matters to us.

Cliché it might be, but this letter has been deeply sad to write.

We are the interim Branch Officers for Reform UK, Chester North and Neston / Ellesmere Port and Bromborough, and we are all resigning from our posts, in concert and with immediate effect.

We can no longer represent Reform UK. We can no longer face our voters, your masters, Mr Yusuf, and sincerely defend your Party’s actions. This decision comes after careful thought and with resounding unity.

I Am Thinking of Building a Global Politician Surveillance System.

The Tools Are Already Available.

Who is In?

Governments have built a vast surveillance network to monitor, control and restrict us.

They track our finances, online activity, movements and even conversations.

But who is watching them?

It is time to turn the tables.

I want to build a real time global system that monitors politicians, tracks their votes, analyses their laws and exposes their actions before it is too late.

If they track us we track them. If they try to hide we expose them.

Here is how we can do it🧵 1 What Would This System Do

🔹 Track every bill in real time

✅ Pull legislative data from public APIs starting with the UK then expanding globally

✅ Use AI automation to analyse bills before they pass identifying

•The worst case scenario of each law such as surveillance, financial control and censorship

•Hidden clauses that attack freedoms

•Which MPs are backing it and who is fighting it

🚨 They rely on us only seeing the impact after it is too late. This stops that.

🧵 The Data (Use and Access) Bill

The Digital Control Grid is Here

We stopped the Climate & Nature Bill (for now), but they haven’t given up.

Instead of trying to control our resources first, they’re building the digital infrastructure to control us instead.

This bill is slipping through Parliament quietly and unless we expose it, it will pass before people even realise what’s happening.

Let’s break it down 👇 1️⃣ What Is the Data (Use and Access) Bill?

The Government claims this bill is about:

✅ "Cutting red tape"
✅ "Boosting efficiency"
✅ "Helping businesses and public services share data"

Sounds harmless, right?

🚨 Wrong.

This bill lays the foundation for mass financial surveillance, a national digital ID system, and automated enforcement of government policies.

It’s not about making data more accessible. it’s about making YOU more controllable.

🧵: THEY KNEW. THEY LIED. THEY MURDERED THEM.

1/ Every time I go back to this, it makes me sick. The elderly in care homes were not cared for.

They were systematically killed with Midazolam and Morphine and their deaths were falsely recorded as COVID to fuel a manufactured crisis. 2/ Since 2021, many of us have been exposing this. We were ridiculed, ignored, and silenced. But now, with a senior coroner confirming the truth, the cover-up is crumbling. The state executed the vulnerable and called it a pandemic.

🧵 The NHS is Broken. Vulnerable Patients Are Being Left to Rot Until Someone Kicks Off

1/ Five years ago, my mother in law was diagnosed with dementia.

It is a cruel, degenerative disease. Over time, it strips away memory, independence, and eventually even the ability to move. 2/ Before the COVID Scamdemic, we made the decision to keep her at home rather than put her in a care facility.

We have managed her care as a family, ensuring she had dignity and comfort.

1)

https://x.com/chrislittlewoo8/status/1878431823132229893

2)

https://x.com/chrislittlewoo8/status/1878434062525767864

🚨 The Climate and Nature Bill: A Blueprint for Tyranny 🚨

This bill, with its second reading on 24 January 2025, has the backing of 192 MPs, councils, mayors, and political parties.

But beneath the flowery language lies a chilling reality: mass control, surveillance, and the destruction of your freedoms.

Here’s what they don’t want you to know 👇 1/

The Climate and Nature Bill claims to "protect the planet," but in reality, it will enslave the majority while sparing the elites.

Read the bill yourself and see the truth behind their words:

👉 zerohour.uk/downloads/clim…

UK Labour MP Justin Madders: A Record of Silence and Neglect
A 🧵👇

1/

12 months ago, I met with UK Labour MP Justin Madders, then Shadow Minister for Employment Rights and Protections. I presented clear, scientific evidence on the dangerous inclusion of SV40 DNA in COVID-19 mRNA injections and its implications.

I warned him about the following: 2/

•SV40 DNA: A known oncogenic element capable of integrating into human DNA.

•Its delivery via lipid nanoparticles (LNPs), designed to penetrate cells, making integration even more likely.

•The heightened cancer risk, especially for children, whose developing immune systems are most vulnerable.

They injected your children for profit, status, greed, and power.

The harm, injuries, and deaths of children were mere collateral in their pursuit of personal gain.

IgG class switching, SV40 and the implications for your children.

A 🧵👇 1. COVID Infections Post-Injection:

Every child in the following study caught COVID after receiving the Pfizer injection.

COVID posed an extremely low risk to healthy children, making it unethical to inject them with an untested gene therapy.

A story about @RevolutApp

Going through my VAT return today, I noticed they had decided to take £750 per month in charges out of my account.

Worried, I contacted them.

The following screenshots of our conversation show how bad this is.

FYI I have held this account for a long time and never agreed to these changes.

So we move on with this ridiculous conversation, it’s taken hours

A 🧵that scares me more than anything else. 👇

The slow release of the most terrifying information ever published by the BBC, couched in lies, platitudes & soothing language.

bbc.com/news/health-67… Lie 1

“Covid vaccines given to millions of people could be fine-tuned for even greater accuracy, UK scientists say.”

No, what they really said is the injections have been exposed by independent scientific studies to do exactly what was hidden from Governments & the Public.

A 🧵about the explosive growth of Cancer in 14-44 years olds in the UK

Don’t bother trying to tell me this is all because we closed cancer screening for 4 months in early 2020.

That excuse just doesn’t wash anymore.

I dread to think what 2023 will show.👇 Turbo Cancer 59% Rise in 2022

Analysis of Excess Adjusted Death Rates from Malignant Neoplasms Without
Specification of Site

In the Figure (left) below we can observe that the excess deaths rates from malignant neoplasms without specification of site were close to zero in 2020, then rose to about +32% in 2021 and about +59% in 2022.

In terms of statistical significance of the excess deaths, we observe from the Figure (right) below that for cancers without specification of site, in 2020 the Z-score for adjusted death rates was low, which point to low statistical significance.

In 2021 the Z-score was about 3.1, which is a strong signal in statistical terms.

In 2022 the Z-score was close to 6, which is a very strong signal and indicates that the excess deaths from these cancers are statistically significant deviations from the 2010-2019 trend.

When looking at changes in the fraction of all deaths attributed to cancers without specification of site, we observe that the fraction of deaths from these cancers were slightly below trend in 2020 and at 13% above trend for 2021 (with low statistical significance).

In 2022 however, the fraction of deaths for these cancers jumped about 42%, with a Z-score of above 4, indicating very high statistical significance.

It appears that deaths from cancers without specification of site as a fraction of all deaths deviated significantly from prior trends in 2022.

Summary:

Our analysis shows that the excess deaths rates from malignant neoplasms without specification of site were close to zero in 2020, then rose to about +32% in 2021 and about +59% in 2022.

The excess mortality from malignant neoplasm without specification of site in 2021 and 2022 are highly statistically significant with Z-scores of 3.1 and close to 6, respectively. These are very strong signals, in particular for 2022.

These signals are corroborated by similar findings when measuring rises in the fraction of deaths from malignant neoplasms without specification of site relative to all other deaths with classified causes.

Excess Deaths. 🧵/📕

As promised here is the update after a face-to-face meeting with my MP Justin Madders @justinmadders the Shadow Minister (Future of Work), and the Shadow Minister (Employment Rights and Protections).

Meeting 27/10/2023 3 pm

Firstly, I would like to thank my MP for allowing me to speak in person; although the allocated slot was 20 minutes, this time period was extended.

This was a non-confrontational, cordial meeting in which, as posted previously, I had a set number of questions I wanted to ask.

Question A

What was his opinion on the information provided in Andrew Bridgen’s speech on UK excess deaths in the House of Commons on the 20th of October 2023?

He answered that “as I was aware he had attended, he had made significant notes and had already sent in a number of written questions in relation to the issues presented”

He said, “he was disappointed that throughout the evidence presented, there was still not a fully definable link between excess deaths and the injections”.

We both agreed that more evidence was coming to light on a daily basis.

At this point, he asked me for my opinion on excess deaths.

I responded that it would be naïve and foolish to blame every excess death on the injections and that a culmination of these and NPIs would have created the situation we currently face.

He asked for clarification on the meaning of NPI, which I explained was Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions, such as lockdowns and creating an NHS waiting list of nearly 7.6 million people.

In relation to the injections, I gave a basic overview of IgG3 switching to IgG4 and how repeat injections lowered the person's immune response.

I pointed out how IgG4 was positively utilised in transplants of organs such as kidneys and hearts to stop a person's natural immune system from rejecting the organ.

But described how this was creating issues with people becoming repeatedly infected with CV and the effects being worse.

I gave a specific example of “Shingles” a subject he appeared through his body language to have been made aware of.

I explained how shingles is the same dormant chicken pox virus that people caught as children, the natural immune system has already defeated this infection and learned to suppress it, it was only because of a weakened immune system we are seeing so many resurgence cases of shingles after the injections.

I also mentioned “Professor Dalglish” the famous cancer specialist and how he was witnessing cancer patients, specifically melanoma (his field) that had been in remission for years, to have the cancer return very aggressively after the Covid Injections.

Mr Madders made significant notes, he was not aware of IgG switching and its implications.

I then tried my best to explain the inclusion of SV40 into the the injections.

Mr Madders didn’t know what SV40 was or what an LNP was.

I tried my best to explain that the Simian Virus 40 promoter was added to the injection and enclosed in Liquid Nano Particles so that it could enter the cells in order for the body to start producing spike protein thus attempting to generate an immune response.

I stated that it was a known fact that SV40 was oncogenic, it creates cancers.

I described how the SV40 promoter was hidden in the details presented to the MHRA in the EUA submission as well as numerous medical regulatory bodies throughout the world.

I stated, that I believed a culmination of NPI’s IGG and SV40 are the primary cause for the excess deaths we are currently experiencing.

Lots of notes were taken down
Mr Madders then said, “I'm asking too many questions, let's get back to the questions you have”.

Question B

Do you think questions need to be asked and answered as to why so many people of all ages across the board are dying before their time?

Mr Madders answered categorically “YES”. He said, “he had already sent in a number of questions about this issue after the debate on the 20th”. Question C

Do you have any information on the rate of excess mortality within your own constituency?

Mr Madders answered that “he did not”

To be quite honest, he looked like someone had hit him on the back of the head with a shovel, as to why he hadn’t thought of that.

“He said he wasn’t sure if the information was available at constituency level and that he would try and find out”.

I said I would also look for this information and if identified I would provide it.

Question D

What was your opinion of the Health Minister’s response to Mr Bridgen’s speech, when she stated that 93.6% of the population had received at least one injection; when everybody knows that the figures are fundamentally flawed?

He said “he was not aware that they were flawed and even so, surely the point she was trying to make was that a lot of people had taken the injection”.

I said this point was crucial to many of the things he believed.

The actual UK Population that has been injected including children of all ages was about 78% (I would email exact figures).

The Debate was about excess deaths across all age groups, changing the overall percentage on such a huge scale, massively distorts how the data is understood.

The same way in which you have repeatedly told me that based on these figures, taking the injection is the best form of defence.

When you look at that with a reduction to 78% the evidence changes dramatically.

More notes were taken down.

Question E

I know that you wanted to participate in the last adjournment debate, but because of lack of time, you were not afforded that opportunity.

Will you support Andrew Bridgen’s call for a 3-hour Back Bench Business Debate so that a full 3 hours can be allotted to discuss in greater detail what was identified in his speech?

Mr Madders responded with a resounding “NO”.

Before I could respond he said “I can’t, I’m not a back-bencher, I’m a Shadow Minister”.

Yep, I did feel a little foolish, but he said “he was having to respond to many people with the same reply”.

However, he immediately suggested that Mr Brigden could apply for a West Minister Halls debate that any MP could apply for and would last for 1.5 hours.

Interestingly, he also said he believed that Andrew would now have more than enough support to gain a Back Bench Business Debate.

I then asked if either of these debates managed to be scheduled, would he 1 attend and 2 participate?

He answered that “he would as long as no other emergency matters presented themselves”.

It isn’t possible to nail someone’s hat to the chair when the debate has not been scheduled and times have not been announced, however, I felt he gave an honest answer that he would both support, participate and engage.

For me, that’s a win.

Final question, I pre-ambled this with an explanation that I watched the whole set of debates live on the 20th and while Mr Madders was on his feet, he was asked by a Conservative MP, why he had supported all of the Government Mandates without and evidence, to which Mr Madders responded “that’s a bit rich coming from your side”.

I saw the glimmer of a parliamentarian in his eyes as he no doubt thought how did you expect me to answer?

Question F

Finally, how can you now justify supporting nearly every action the Government proposed without any risk/benefit analysis, now that the public enquiry has shown that every NPI has shown that every NPI has had a disastrous effect on society?

He said he would probably respond as he did in the House of Commons”, but he also said “Knowing what we know now, we would probably do it differently.

We were in a national crisis and it didn’t seem appropriate to fully challenge the Government, rather just support them in this crisis”.

He said, “We are not supplied with the same information as the Government, we are sent a list of recommendations by the Government and told the Science & Medical Establishment is recommending this, you should support it”.

A 🧵

Cowardice in Government.

Questions need to be asked.

If you think these questions are relevant, please tag in your local MP.

I’ll tag mine, even though the poltroon has blocked me. 👇 My local MP Justin Madders @justinmadders a coward in my opinion) sent a written question to the Department of Heath:

He tabled the following written Parliamentary Question on the 18th of July:

A 🧵 It’s time to put an immediate end to ULEZ
because TFL can’t protect your Personal Data.

Hey @MayorofLondon @TFL @ICOnews

I have questions.

Over recent months TFL have had multiple ULEZ cameras removed from live traffic monitoring sites. Have you reported these ULEZ camera thefts to the ICO as a data breach?

In fact multiple Data Breaches?

Have you informed all of the members of the public that their identifiable personal data has been removed from your control & that their personal data has been compromised?

I just can’t believe what I am reading.

The UK Government has approved this SKYCovion COVID Shot based on a nothing burger.

I’ll make some salient points about it. 1.Its efficacy was not part of the clinical trials.

That means they don’t even know if it’s effective.

They didn’t test to see if it’s any good!

The Electricity Demand Flexibility Service (DFS) is an assault on our populations basic living standards.

There is no shortage of energy, it’s not expensive for National Grid to purchase.

(lowest since 2021). It’s an environmental scam, they are rationing people with an incentive of heating & eating.

You are being robbed.

This is not a choice that people in this country should have to make, or need to make.

They just want to incentivise more people to get smart meters.

Why Justin Madders @justinmadders

In 2022, as we saw an increasing number of excess deaths in our population, yet you didn’t ask 1 question in the HoC, or pen one letter on behalf of your constituents regarding this matter?

(Hansard).

Not once.

Why? Why does it not concern you that more & more of your constituents are dying?

Not a single question, not 1 letter. Why?

Why since 2021 have you not raised a single question, or written a single letter about MRNA injection safety?