Thread by @frank_moriarity

@Rainmaker1973 Hubble made one big mistake which the JWST is bringing to light (pardon the pun). Hubble assumed perpetual motion of light, which is a dynamic measurable process of potential energy shifting between magnetic and electric fields. He assumed that a 400nm wave would arrive here…./

@Rainmaker1973 … at 400nm, and the only reason it might arrive here redder (up to 700nm) was because of the expansion of space, likely a myth. Hubble was a young man when the Doppler Effect was a brand new, exciting, easily observed principle of sound waves contracting and expanding with …../

@Rainmaker1973 … relative speed between the listener and the TRAIN. Trains were a a marvel, going faster and faster. Then 30 years later EM waves also demonstrated the Doppler effect in the lab. That doesn’t mean the red shift he observed was from relative speeds. Light, an EM function, …/

@Rainmaker1973 #moves through a continual EM function called the quantum flux, and also 1e-/2m^3. It is irrational to think this dynamic wave exhibits no energy loss, perpetual motion, over billions of lightyears of travel. Hubble was irrational. Think of …./

@Rainmaker1973 light moving through glass. Most people think it slows down in the glass and miraculously speeds up when it exits. Wrong. It’s speed does not change. The incident light interacts with the material, creating a wave in the glass, that is out of phase with the …/

@Rainmaker1973 … incident light. The sum of these waves makes its seem to slow down. It “takes energy” to create the wave in the glass. The light leaving the glass must have an unimaginably small increase in wave length as a result (red shift) , because it is the source of energy. …/

@Rainmaker1973 Hubble ignored this simple absolute law of nature, there is no such thing as perpetual motion, even in the shifting of potential energy between fields in light waves. The JWST is now illuminating this oversight. It might take a couple of decades to make people realize…../

@Rainmaker1973 …. The Big Bang is wrong.

It’s wrong for several other reasons, but this JWST data is the first tangible empirical evidence it’s wrong.

Feel free to DM me if you feel passionate about this either way. I wish I had the $$ to prove this experimentally. That would be science!!

@Rainmaker1973 @threadreaderapp unroll