Arguments against individual climate action are posted at a never-ending pace. Here’s a 🧵from a behavioral scientist on why individual behavior change is in fact critical for tackling the climate crisis. #individualANDsystemchange
Let’s begin by disarming the most common argument against individual action: that the carbon footprint was created by the fossil fuel industry.
First, this is not entirely true. But even if true, the concept can still have scientific and practical value. For example, it’s been used to point out the incredible inequality in who contributes to causing climate change. @lucas_chancel @JKSteinberger nature.com/articles/s4189…
This is not to say that the fossil fuel industry doesn’t want to individualize the problem, which is certainly problematic (and their actions have been and continue to be criminal). The work of @NaomiOreskes, @GeoffreySupran, @BenFranta and others beautifully shows this.
However, this doesn’t mean that individual behavior changes are irrelevant or infeasible within the current system. The actions and support of individuals are critical for achieving, maintaining, and adapting to systemic changes. researchgate.net/publication/33…
In fact, IMO behavior change represents an under-utilized mitigation strategy. For example, when was the last time you heard policymakers encourage their constituents to limit flying or meat consumption or implemented policies to make this happen? 🤔
There are many reasons why people might dismiss individual actions. One reason is that it shifts attention away from one’s own (typically high) emissions, which alleviates feeling bad about it. This can be legitimate though when behavior change is too difficult or costly.
Another related reason reflects a constrained conceptualization of individual action. Too often individual behavior change is equated with what we do as consumers. But this unnecessarily constrains what people can do to help speed up climate mitigation.
We can act in many other roles, including as citizens, investors, participants in organizations, community members. @netflix created some science-based recommendations for how to get involved and which actions to prioritize across roles. @LeoDiCaprio dontlookup.count-us-in.com/steps
While we may not have time or be able to take action(s) in all these roles, we can prioritize the actions that can deliver the greatest climate benefits, either personally or for other people/communities/organizations. Attention to actions' potential climate impact is key here!
For example, you can shift your investments to sustainable projects, promote climate initiatives at work or in your local community, or participate in social movements to demand political or organizational change. All these actions can help diffuse change at scale.
Consumer action is also often too easily dismissed. Reducing air travel, avoiding red meat, electrifying your home, and shifting to public transport certainly make a difference. Even with system change, this will all have to happen so why delay the change? iopscience.iop.org/article/10.108…
When discussing individual action, we have to also acknowledge the inequality in who has the greatest potential to make an impact. Generally, this potential increases with socioeconomic status as outlined in my work with @KA_Nicholas @efesce @tdietzvt
nature.com/articles/s4156…
KEY TAKEAWAY: Achieving the transformative changes needed is an immense task that requires the support and engagement of individuals who will not only have to fundamentally change their activities/behavior but also support, accept, and adapt to transformative initiatives...
So how about we start acknowledging that both individual and systemic changes are pivotal and not mutually exclusive!🤞Time is short so let's applaud all efforts that help make real change happen! 🌍

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Kristian Steensen Nielsen

Kristian Steensen Nielsen Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @kristiansn89

Mar 7
🚨New ESM study on how food environments, situational factors, and self-control influence healthy food choices led by @janmbauer with @LuciaReisch & @wilhelm_hofmann and published in @socscimed. I really like this paper, so here's a 🧵on why that is.
sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
I'm a huge fan of experience sampling, which we here use to build bridges between research on physical micro-environments/choice architecture and on self-control. We explored if selecting oneself into certain environments matters for the healthiness of out-of-home food choices.
FOCUS: We focus our analysis on out-of-home food choices, which includes all meal and snack purchases from retail or food service sector (e.g., cafeterias, take-away, and read-to-eat foods from supermarkets; henceforth, food outlets) intended for immediate consumption
Read 23 tweets
Feb 2
.@netflix has created a new guide with climate actions to accompany #DontLookUp . I served as an advisor alongside much more prominent scholars like @jrockstrom @KHayhoe @MichaelEMann @GlobalEcoGuy @DoctorVive. Netflix did a good job! A short 🧵 why.
dontlookup.count-us-in.com/steps
First, why on earth was I invited to be an advisor? Well, apparently the climate action guide was inspired by a framework from my recent article in @NatureEnergyJnl with @KA_Nicholas, @efesce, & @tdietzvt. This was a pretty neat validation of our work! nature.com/articles/s4156…
Why do I like the guide? For one because it moves beyond the easy and simple behaviors with negligible climate benefits (e.g., recycling) and instead recommends high-impact behaviors that people can undertake via their different roles in life...
Read 9 tweets
Jan 27
Excited to share a new article on carbon labeling in @NatureClimate with @tdietzvt, @michaelvandenb6, @rlshwom, Khan Taufique & Paul Stern.

We find carbon labeling a promising mitigation initiative but perhaps not for the reasons you think. A long🧵...
nature.com/articles/s4155…
BACKGROUND: We reviewed the literature on how carbon labeling systems can influence consumer and corporate behavior to reduce GHG emissions. We also refer to the literature on energy labeling, which is more developed.
What is carbon labeling? Carbon labeling summarizes data on the greenhouse gases (GHG) emitted from the production, distribution, and use (“carbon footprints”) of a good or service in a simple indicator presented at the point of purchase
Read 22 tweets
Sep 30, 2021
There is inequality in who causes climate change, who experiences its consequences, and who can fix it. As we show in @NatureEnergyJn, people with high socioeconomic status disproportionately affect the success or failure of climate mitigation. A thread.

nature.com/articles/s4156…
People with high SES not only have excessive carbon footprints through consumption, but they also have disproportionate power through their roles as investors, role models, participants in organizations, and citizens.
Through these five roles, they can help shape the choices available to themselves and others, providing options that either exacerbate or mitigate climate change. Currently, they are mostly used to exacerbate emissions, but this can and should change. #ClimateAction
Read 16 tweets
May 20, 2021
Excited to share a new paper on the environmental impacts of clothing. With data from four countries, we show how impacts vary across the life cycle and between countries. We find strong country differences with U.S. consumers having the greatest impacts.
sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
We also show that the largest share of associated environmental impacts is created during the production phase, except in the U.S. where it's the use phase due to more frequent washing and drying. Transport from factories to markets and disposal matter little overall (2/6)
One of our main contributions is to move beyond stylized assumptions of use-phase behavior and to show that washing and drying frequency can be important drivers of impacts, particularly in countries with carbon-intensive energy grids (3/6)
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(