Oh YIMBY know how to yell. …at the elders, BIPOC & (especially on Housing Twitter) at the women who dare to point out how the blanket zoning deregulation policies lead to their eviction.

Lest we forget head YIMBY putting elders in the hospital pushing #SB827 🧵
Same tactics used by their NIMBY suburban parents/grandparents to oppose affordable housing:

“Supervisor candidate and BARF founder Sonja Trauss moved into the crowd and shook her protest sign in the face of an elderly Chinese man…”

sfexaminer.com/news/sb-827-ra…
“When folks show you who they are believe them.”

How many times do YIMBY leaders need to be seen 2B believed?

How many more Koch Bros funded researchers do they need to hire?

How many YIMBY comm directors need to claim supporting 100% affordable housing is “not progressive?”
This is a right wing Koch Bros, Big Tech & real estate industry well funded astroturf “movement” started by libertarians selling snake oil - their claims collapse under examination. And they appropriate justice language to push their Robert Moses remaking of all cities. Periodt!
YIMBY minions online r a combo of fools & a good % don’t support any concept of market regulation (including rent control).

They meet a particular demo (aggressive upwardly mobile white male) for a reason - they have & r most to benefit from racialized capitalism.
Their frustration is that the n’hoods their parents/grandparents fled r now “cool” & “upcoming,” yet those at-risk of being pushed out & seeing their area changed, see YIMBY as the colonizers they r.

YIMBY directing their ire on ppl who organize these folks is natural reflex.
What YIMBY allows them to do (especially on Housing Twitter) is express their internalized racism, misogyny, anti-poor, & belief in their inalienable right to dominate wherever they stand.

Manifest Destiny rebranded as #ManifestDensity

…The Proud Boys of Real Estate indeed.
Racism, cultural erasure & violent urban colonialism under the claim of “abundance” (& other appropriated words) via an economic theory that was decades ago dismissed by the general public & recognized as composed by & for the very rich ppl now funding YIMBY.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Damien Goodmon

Damien Goodmon Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @damienISgoodmon

Oct 9
Look at the replies to understand why I call them The Proud Boys of Real Estate

Anyone who thinks to blame decades-in-the-making housing crisis on 1of11 Dem Socialist Supervisor who has been in office 3yrs & founded a statewide tenants advocacy org is insane, stupid or paid off.
Any honest observation is that San Francisco was sold off to Big Tech, commercial real estate & venture capitalists going back to at least Willie Brown’s administration.

And as South Bay cities were adding millions in creative office space for six-figure migrant tech workers…
SF didnt protect the affordable housing stock.

As a tenants rights atty & advocate, Dean & folk like him r the only reason it isnt worse for the remain SF low-income & working class.

Meanwhile SF’s tech engineer gentrifiers r famously NOT housing insecure. So y they so loud? Image
Read 7 tweets
Oct 8
1. Not right.

2. Missing middle used to mean those who make too much for public housing & not enough to buy a home. Literally the equivalent today of the 50-80% AMI.

Then it came to mean moderate income (80-120% AMI).

Now it’s just less than a tech engineer wants to pay. 🤦🏾‍♂️
2. We’ve seen repeatedly the promise of zoning deregulation w/o affordability requirements leading to missing middle. It’s snake oil.

We saw that with small lot subdivisions in LA a decade ago. Same w/duplex laws.
Instead what we see is the new homes more often than not selling at higher price than the initial home acquisition price, & overall hikes in sq ft prices in markets where the splitting is feasible & desirable.
Read 4 tweets
Oct 8
YIMBY not only dont give a 💩 a/b protecting tenants (& I’ll add at-risk homeowners) ur orgs oppose every effort to do something meaningful under the claim of it interfering w/the market.

Fact is YIMBY dont want vacancy control b/c u want to occupy the urban space BIPOC live in.
All of the meaningful things to protect tenants & long-time residents could be put in place by the legislature TOMORROW to create this “make it hard to displace tenants” world a reality. And yet YIMBY don’t direct their energy towards it. AND YIMBY NEVER WILL!
Stuff just as simple to pass as a blanket upzoning:

Statewide vacancy control
High flipper taxes
Tenant Opportunity to Purchase
Ellis Act repeal
Anti-harassment ordinances
Criminal penalties for habitability violations
Etc etc w/a comparatively small amount of💰 for enforcement
Read 6 tweets
Sep 26
Hard to not see that the Ca statewide ban on parking minimums #AB2097 convo is a reflection of typical shortcomings of white urbanists, and in particular their absence of understanding of equity & race, and refusal to see obvious conflicts with their urbanists dreams. 🧵
While white urbanists & politicians claim the bill advances equity, the actual anti-poverty orgs w/decades standing up for the low-income and people of color are saying different.

Here’s from the Western Center on Law & Poverty, Public Interest Law Project & CRLA Fndn: Image
“When AB 2097 passed the Assembly as well as Senate policy committees, it required that housing development projects of 40 or more units include affordable units in exchange for being relieved of complying with minimum parking standard…” #AB2097
Read 5 tweets
Sep 26
Y does LAT regularly quote at length folks like Manville, but never an urban geographer?

This is a bold-faced lie.

Removing development requirements only ensures greater profits (& often higher land value). It does NOT lower prices!

The way to lower prices is to MANDATE IT.
And weird (but understandable) to see Garcetti carrying our flag.

#AB2097 eliminates the lone (paltry, flawed but better than nothing) optional inclusionary zoning policy (around transit stops) that exists for the 99% of CA cities.

Calling this a win for equity is insulting.
This is the result of a well-funded campaign to deregulate housing development & thereby ANY POSSIBLE LEVERAGE locals have to push speculative/for-profit market-rate developers to be slightly responsive to the current need for affordable & mod-income housing.

It’s insane.
Read 8 tweets
Aug 27
Won't someone do something a/b those NIMBYs at the Federal Reserve? They've done it again! 🙃

Zoning is & always has been a red herring. Wall Street determines when, where, how & what type of housing gets built. Been this way for 40+ years. #YIMBY

bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
If it's not already in construction, it is in trouble.

And even if it is in construction, numbers might require some significant adjustment.

Don't believe me. Ask any developer.
Raw data here: census.gov/construction/n…

Next update is mid-September. It'll be much worse by then.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(