A few people have asked why this satellite image of the #CrimeanBridge shows so many damaged sections from a single explosion, so here's a brief Bridges 101 on the likely failure mechanism. 🧵
This section of the bridge is a simple "beam bridge" design. The road deck in each direction is supported on large steel girders, which span between regularly spaced concrete piers. The load on the piers is then transmitted deep into the ground by lots of concrete piles.
1) The explosion causes the failure of one bridge deck near the middle of span 3, clearly indicated by the blackening of the adjacent road surface. (I'll not discuss the specific what and where of the explosion here.)
2) Rather than having a separate beam for each span, it's common for the deck to be continuous over multiple spans. As the deck buckles and falls into the water, it pulls on the rest of the beam and the bridge deck on both sides shifts towards the damaged area.
3) There are regular breaks in the continuous beam to account for normal thermal expansion of the bridge deck. You can see some of these expansion joints in this video (and hear the distinctive "clunk clunk" as the wheels pass over them)
The expansion joints at spans 1 and 4 don't transmit the pulling force from the falling deck, and so the deck is pulled off its bearings on top of the piers, causing these spans to fail too.
Span 2 is still standing, but will need to be replaced as it is part of the same damaged beam as spans 1, 2 and 4. Span 5 on the other side of the expansion joint is likely to be ok, if its pier hasn't been damaged by span 4 falling.
Some further thoughts in response to your replies:
Lower water levels and recent images and drone footage make it possible to assess the most likely failure mechanisms of the #KakhovkaDam in several locations. Here is why I think internal explosion(s) remain the most likely cause.🧵
If you haven't already, be sure to read Parts 1 and 2 of this thread for background on the construction and operation of the barrage and hydroelectric power plant, and earlier damage assessment:
I was all set to state my case by comparing the above Maxar satellite image to previous videos and pre-June photos of the HPP, but stills from this new drone footage will make things significantly easier.
As more information becomes available on the #KakhovkaDam collapse, it will be important to understand how the structure worked.🏗️
In this thread I'll explore the barrage and power plant through section drawings, before moving on to a discussion of damage. 🧵
The "dam" is really several structures working together to create the Kakhovka Reservoir: a long earth-filled embankment dam, a central concrete barrage to control water flow, and a hydroelectric plant for power generation.
The BARRAGE is a concrete gravity dam with crane-operated sluice gates to control the water level in the reservoir and the Dnieper River below for shipping and irrigation, and to maintain a head of water for power generation. Road and railway bridges are supported by the piers.
How do you dispose of a huge WW2 bomb in the middle of a town while keeping everyone safe? Sand!
The discovery of a 250kg bomb in #GreatYarmouth last week provided a great example of how the Army responds to these threats. 🧵
Last Tuesday a WW2 bomb was discovered during dredging work in the River Yare. It's common to unearth old bombs during construction work in the UK, and they still pose a real danger 80 years later.
This appears to have been a German SC 250.
SC 250s have a total mass of 250kg of which 130kg is a high explosive such as TNT.
Detonating 130kg of TNT in an urban area is a bad idea [citation required] due to the risks of death/injury and damage from:
💥Fragmentation of the bomb casing
💥Shock waves in air
💥Ground shock