Paypal has been leading this truly dangerous effort to banish people from the financial system for expressing dissent from neoliberal orthodoxies. They partnered with @ADL - a standard DNC/liberal group - to identify "extremists" who deserve to be banned.
I believe Paypal's claim that it was an "error" to publish a policy saying they'd steal $2,500 from anyone whose opinions it disliked -- only because they weren't ready to publish it yet and weren't ready for the backlash that harmed their stock price:
This is absolutely one of the new frontiers of state/corporate censorship: punishing dissidents in the West through exclusion from the financial system.
Justin Trudeau froze the bank accounts of trucker protests with no due process. This is their future:
It continues to be the height of dark irony that the very same people who can't stop glorifying themselves as the courageous vanguards against "fascism" are those cheering this union of state and corporate power to punish dissent. That's what Big Tech censorship is, too.
On Paypal's leading censorship role, this is key history many have forgotten.
In 2010, Joe Lieberman pressured banks and financial services companies to cut off WikiLeaks after it published docs on US war crimes. They all complied, starting with Paypal:
This is why we created the @FreedomofPress Foundation in 2012: me, @DanielEllsberg, Laura Poitras, @trevortimm, others: to circumvent this extra-judicial punishment and allow WL to keep getting donations.
And these events highlight the surreal part of my work: for all the endless claims of how I've chaaaanged, things like this article (👆) and creating @FreedomofPress for WL show I've been working against the same authoritarian threats for years.
What changed is who supports them
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
People surprised by this tweet are revealing their ignorance.
While the conspiratorial media kept claiming Trump was controlled by Putin, the Trump Admin was aggressively confronting Russia: arming Ukraine and sabotaging Nord Stream 2.
Rick Wilson defrauded gullible progressives out of $65,000 for a blockbuster anti-Trump film he kept promising to extract more money and, of course, it never came.
@gofundme chose to do nothing about this blatant fraud even though it's been reported and denounced many times.
The issue isn't Rick Wilson or Lincoln Project. People who don't know by now they're the worst scumbags and lowest con artists deserve to have their money taken.
The issue is @gofundme & @MSNBC chose to do nothing because the thief has liberal politics.
The only reason @SteveSchmidtSES is now doing a gigantic thread on what frauds, liars and thieves run @ProjectLincoln is the Showtime documentary left no doubt about it. It's all been long been known. Liberals chose to ignore it because it's who they are.
This shit has been going on for years. DC neoliberal elites have assigned themselves license to lie and defame anyone who dissents from neoliberal orthodoxy as "Russian agents" or "Kremlin assets."
At least McCarthy and Hoover would hold hearings to do this. They just assert it.
Anyone who questions US foreign policy or the bullshit premises of Russigate has been labelled a "Russian agent" or "Kremlin asset."
I don't mean by random Twitter trolls. The NBC/CNN/DNC crowd does it routinely, along with their CIA and FBI colleagues. No evidence needed.
People like @AVindman are absolute scumbags. They should be sued. Hillary Clinton, who never served anyone but herself, did it to @TulsiGabbard.
And, of course, these career liars are the ones who want to censor the internet to stop "disinformation": as they smear reflexively.
That was the point of this thread. Dissent on the US role in Ukraine comes only from right-wing media and the populist parts of the GOP caucus (with the exception of a few left-wing writers), because there is no "US left" separate from the Dem Party:
Speaking of which, read this good and important Newsweek essay from @DavidSacks on the full-scale marriage between neocons and the cultural liberal-left.
They pretended for awhile it was just an anti-Trump coalition; it's far more enduring than that:
It is only in the US and in a few of its most repressive NATO allies where debate is this narrow and closed.
The mainstream US "left" is now claiming such great affinity for Lula. Yet look at what Lula - from the start - has been saying about the US role in the war in Ukraine.
Noam Chomsky spoke to BBC and strongly criticized Lula's party, PT, for relying too much on celebrities and academics and not enough on popular movements, noting Bolsonaro has large public rallies. He also compared PT to the US Dem Party's neoliberalism:
Chomsky's criticisms do not mean he supports Bolsonaro (obviously). He's a long-time Lula supporter.
But he's always tried to be an honest analyst, not a partisan loyalist. Also warned: focus on social issues obscures class issues. He noted massive polling errors. Key passages:
Chomsky has focused on Latin American politics for decades and spends ample time in Brazil with his Brazilian wife.
Note, too, how Chomsky is covered by major Latin American media (Globo). Candidates seek his support. In the US, he's ignored except when useful ("Vote Dem!").