🚨⚖️COURT ALERT: The Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court will hear oral arguments today in a Republican lawsuit seeking to strike down #Act77.

Here’s what you need to know.👇🧵
In 2019, the Republican-controlled Pennsylvania Legislature passed Act 77, a major election reform law that enacted no-excuse mail-in voting. The law also extended the time period allowed to register to vote before an election, funded new election equipment and more.
In July 2021, a group of Republican state lawmakers, who originally supported and passed the law in 2019, filed a lawsuit arguing that Act 77 violates the Pennsylvania Constitution and should be struck down.
democracydocket.com/cases/pennsylv…
In August 2022, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court upheld Act 77 and no-excuse mail-in voting in the state.
democracydocket.com/news-alerts/pe…
But before the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s ruling to uphold Act 77 was released, another lawsuit was filed by the same group of Republican lawmakers seeking to strike down the law in its entirety.
democracydocket.com/news-alerts/re…
The Republicans argue that Act 77 should be struck down due to a section of the law that states that “if any provision of this act or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remaining provisions or applications of this act are void.”
This is known as a non-severability clause. It means that if one section of a law is struck down or declared invalid, the whole law must be invalidated.
Republicans allege that a 3rd Circuit ruling that undated mail-in ballots should be counted strikes down a provision of Act 77 that requires voters to write a date on the outer envelope of mail-in ballots. Thus, they claim, all of Act 77 should be voided.
democracydocket.com/cases/pennsylv…
However, yesterday, the U.S. Supreme Court vacated the 3rd Circuit’s decision that required undated ballots to be counted. We don't know the full implications of this new ruling on the Act 77 lawsuit, but it’s sure to complicate matters.
democracydocket.com/cases/pennsylv…
The Republican legislators are asking the court to strike down all remaining provisions of Act 77. Oral arguments are scheduled for today, Oct. 12, and we will be providing live updates.

Find all the filings for the case here.👇
democracydocket.com/cases/pennsylv…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Democracy Docket

Democracy Docket Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DemocracyDocket

Oct 12
Arguments in Pennsylvania over Act 77 have begun. Follow along for live updates.🧵

📺Watch the court proceedings here:
The attorney representing the petitioners (the Republican lawmakers) begins.
Judge: "Do you believe that the United States Supreme Court's vacation of Migliori has any effect on your claims here?"

Petitioners' Atty: "Not really...The bottom line is the Supreme Court vacated Migliori...but it still has persuasive authority."
Read 11 tweets
Oct 11
🚨ALERT: U.S. Supreme Court vacates 3rd Circuit decision requiring Pennsylvania to count undated mail-in ballots. A lower court found that not counting these ballots violates the Materiality Provision of the Civil Rights Act.
democracydocket.com/news-alerts/sc…
The ballots in question are cast by eligible voters, received on time, but simply lack a handwritten date on the outer envelopes. This date is NOT used by election offices to determine if a ballot is received on time and has no further administrative purpose.
The Materiality Provision of the Civil Rights Act protects voters from unnecessary disenfranchisement due to trivial errors — like accidentally omitting a date on a mail-in ballot envelope.
democracydocket.com/news/this-civi…
Read 5 tweets
Oct 7
🚨ALERT: Look Ahead America, a right-wing organization with ties to former President Donald Trump, announced plans for a “pre-election audit” of voter rolls in nine states that feature some of the most competitive elections this year.🧵
democracydocket.com/news-alerts/co…
The group plans to identify voters they deem ineligible in Arizona, Florida, Georgia, Nevada, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia and Wisconsin and ask state election officials to remove those individuals from voter rolls.
Additionally, and most concerning, Look Ahead America plans to share the names of voters they deem ineligible with “local activist groups” so that the local groups can challenge voters as well.
Read 6 tweets
Oct 7
⚖️COURT ALERT: Today at 10:00 am ET, a panel on the Maryland Court of Appeals will hear argument in a lawsuit seeking to allow canvassing boards to open & begin counting received mail-in ballots before Election Day.

Here's what you need to know.⤵️🧵
Maryland election law prohibits canvassing boards from opening and tabulating mail-in ballots until 8:00 am the Wednesday after Election Day.

Maryland is the only state with such a restriction.
ncsl.org/research/elect…
As more people vote by mail, the rule is causing a delay in election results. In the primary elections earlier this year, it took some Maryland jurisdictions weeks after Election Day to finish canvassing and tabulating mail-in ballots, delaying the certification of results.
Read 9 tweets
Oct 6
🚨⚖️COURT ALERT: Today the 5th Circuit is hearing oral arguments in a lawsuit challenging the residency restrictions in Texas voter suppression law #SB1111 for violating the U.S. Constitution.

Follow along for live updates.🧵
Enacted in 2021, SB 1111 creates new residency restrictions to register to vote. The law imposes limits on what type of addresses voters can use to register to vote and allows county officials to require additional verification for some voters to register.
.@votolatino and Texas State @LULAC sued, arguing that the law violates the 1st, 14th and 26th Amendments and unfairly targets young voters, student voters and voters of color. democracydocket.com/cases/texas-re…
Read 21 tweets
Oct 6
🚨STARTING SOON: Today at 9:30 am ET the Delaware Supreme Court is hearing oral arguments in a lawsuit seeking to strike down the state’s no-excuse mail-in voting law.

Follow along for live updates.
📺Watch the arguments here: livestream.com/delawaresuprem…

Find background on the cases and all court filings here.⤵️
democracydocket.com/cases/delaware…
In July, conservative groups filed lawsuits against 2 Delaware laws that established no-excuse mail-in voting and same-day voter registration. They argue that these pro-voting laws violate the state constitution and are harmful to Republican candidates.
Read 24 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(