1/
This woman's speech at a school board meeting–after a school sent emails advertising a "family friendly" drag show for kids (sponsored by a 21+ gay bar)–is so good I'm going to transcribe it and explain why it's so effective.

Watch the whole thing, and let's go through it
🧵
2/
I want you all to be able to do this, that means knowing WHY her speech was effective. So let's go through it

"I just want to know what it is that makes a drag show family friendly? If you follow it to it's logical conclusion you can slap family friendly titles on anything...
3/
So, she begins with two powerful moves:

1. by starting with a question she forces everyone to really think about what "family friendly" actually means

2. She points out that just because something has the title family friendly, does not mean it is really safe for children.
4/
continuing...

"You can have family friendly gentlemen clubs, family friendly strip shows, family friendly 50 shades of grey read alouds. Will you approve my flier if I want to host an "all the sex secrets of the Kama Sutra" for kids and families if, it's family friendly?"
5/
That line is a great use of humor to illustrate the point. She asks the question to set up the topic, makes the point about what family friendly means, and then illustrates the point with a funny example. That's a great opener and it sets her up her next point beautifully...
6/
cont':
"What is it about a grown man, costumed in a sparkly bra with augmented boobs bursting out, and a mini skirt barely covering his twerking ass, with duct tape on his front, spreading his fish-netted legs as he writhes on the ground grinding his groin next to a minor..."
7/
This is a great use of what is called juxtaposition. She uses humor to show that labelling things family friendly doesn't mean they ARE family friendly, then she immediately paints a vivid picture of what an actual drag show is really like.

The effect of this is to show...
8/
that drag shows are as "family friendly" as her absurd examples. By following the humorous examples with a vivid picture of a real drag show, she underscores how inappropriate drag shows are for kids in a way that has a lot of sarcastic bite. that way people remember the point
9/
cont'
"...'Family friendly.' You owe us an answer. You don't get to hide by just taking something down off peachtree (she means peachjar, a communication app) and calling it a day. You owe an explanation and apology."

This let's them know they're not getting off lightly...
10/
The next line is brilliant. After she tells them they don't get off lightly she says:

"You all got caught with your spakley panties down."

This line is a bitingly sarcastic take on "caught with your pants down," but in using it this way she mocks them in a very powerful way
11/
By replacing "pants" in "Caught with your pants down" with "sparkling panties" she calls them out while bitterly mocking drag show fashion. By mocking drag shows she is saying drag shows don't matter,and are not important...it's HER agenda as a parent that is important.
12/
This needs to be stressed. By making sarcastic remarks about drag shows she is letting everyone know she does not care to avoid stepping on the toes of the woke LGBTQ activists who do this stuff...They have to avoid stepping on HER toes. It is HER as the Parent that matters.
13/
cont'
"while we have a culture with a massive problem with child porn and child sex trafficking, you, a little school district boars of adults made the decision to feature and event to hypersexualize you children."

This is another great move. She sets up a problem...
14/
by pointing out there is a massive problem with the exploitation of kids, and then shows how stuff like drag shows for kids makes that worse.

Then comes the big line. She says:

"Do you want to know the word that Defines that? It's gr%^*er"

(I have to censor or I'm banned)
15/
After she drops that she steps on the gas:

"You all played the activist pimp for an align surgical centre and for a 21+ gay bar. It makes you gr&*%ers and activists pimps. And we wont have those sitting on a school board who oversees the education of our children"
16/
(fyi, "align surgical centre" does sex reassignment surgery)
She uses a prostitution pimp analogy to say the school board sold out the safety of the kids for a sponsorship from a gender clinic and a 21+ gay bar what sexualizing kids.

But here is what makes this so effective:
17/
pimp is a dirty term. It is a morally loaded term. A pimp is someone who sells the bodies of others. This woman is saying that by giving a **21+ Gay Bar** and a gender surgery clinic a space to advertise to kids...while trans gender strippers sexualize those kids...
18/
The school is taking sponsorship money in exchange for access to the kids for them to be sxualized. The analogy is, to be fair, a stretch, but it is powerful because it shows there is enough commonality there for the analogy to be understood. The analogy does not need...
19/
to be perfect. The fact that the analogy is even close enough that it makes sense shows just how off the rails the school board is.

Then she finally closes:
20/
"You all stepped out of line you should be ashamed. There is nothing loving, there is no, 'lets unite and include' because the logical conclusion of that is diabolical evil. THERE ARE BOUNDARIES and you don't get to slap family friendly titles on stuff to cover your ass"
21/
She closes with a great finisher. Her point is that love without boundaries ends up with diabolical evil. It ends up with adults taking advantage of children and calling it "love" in order to cover up their crimes. When she says "THERE ARE BOUNDARIES" that is a powerful move.
22/
The point is she wants a BOUNDARY. She is not interested in letting adults get as close to sexually inappropriate with kids as possible without technically crossing the line, she wants a boundary that stops adults BEFORE they get close enough to the line to cross it...
23/
She set that up beautifully.

Now, a couple of final points.

First she showed up with a binder, had her notes, and read when she had to. This woman came prepared. She did not show up and try to make it up as she went. She came prepared and it showed.

Second, she was able...
24/
to connect all of her arguments to each other. Every single thing she did connected to everything else she did. Each point either built on the last point, or set up the next point. She wasted not time. It was a very efficient use of time. That's important.

Third, she had...
25/
a focus. She knew which point she had to make, and she went after it.

Finally...she use rhetorically powerful moral language. She did not shy away from the issue or try to appease the other side. She boldly asserted her moral frame in a powerful way.
26/
This is the correct way to do things.

Pick the point you want to make, use strong rhetorical moves, assert a strong moral frame, and make sure everything flows together.

one more thing....
27/
She does not slide into bigotry. She uses no slurs, she attacks no identity groups, she doesn't do anything like that.

She never attacks people for being gay or trans...she only goes after the School board for their BEHAVIOUR and DECISIONS.

That's powerful...
28/
Losing your cool and using bigotry looks weak, focusing on accountability for behavior and decisions is the winning move.

Thanks for reading. /fin

I write essays on substack which are free. Please have a look and subscribe if you appreciate my work.

wokaldistance.substack.com

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Wokal Distance

Wokal Distance Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @wokal_distance

Oct 12
This is wrong.
As @default_friend has said for years, we're about to see the cringification of the girlboss archetype and it's rejection by the culture, and the rejection of sex positive nihilism that says sex has no inherent meaning but any consentual sex must be celebrated...
because all consentual sex, while having no inherent meaning, is the expression of the self in terms of one's desires, wants, goals, internal feelings, emotions etc...and self expression is to be celebrated.

Because @contrapoints is a millenial who came of age soaked in the...
it is difficult for @contrapoints to understand the rejection of one of the most cherished tropes of the millenial culture. The Girlboss, from it's early "boss bitch" phase in the late 2000's extending to the high period of "YYAASSS KWEEN💅" girlboss sass in the 2010's...
Read 11 tweets
Oct 4
Everyone see the game here?

You, @RevKevDeYoung, arrogantly call things false just because the disagree with you, I, @scott_m_coley, call things false because they are false.

I, @scott_m_coley, will decide what is and is not false teaching and whoever doesn't agree is arrogant. ImageImage
Kristin Dumez pulls the same trick.

She thinks it is arrogant for @RevKevDeYoung to label anyone else a false teacher...but it's totslly fine when she says she knows who has living water and who doesn't.

All these people use exactly the same move. It is this.... ImageImage
"Your judgments about what is true, correct, right, etc...are to be treated like moves in an attempt to gain or keep power. But *MY* judgments about what is true, correct, right, etc...are to be treated like moves in a good faith attempt to find what is true correct right etc."
Read 9 tweets
Sep 30
1/
See this set of cartoons? These cartoons have exactly one message:

That every single thing in society is exactly as good, valuable, and important as every other thing is society.

Let's talk about that

Thread🧵
2/
If you have been paying any attention to the culture you will have noticed something I like to call “the flattening of meaning.” This occurs when the culture decides everything is society is exactly as valuable, meaningful and important as absolutely everything else in society
3/
Nothing is objectively better, more desirable, superior, greater or more excellent any other thing. Everything from fashion choices, lifestyle choices, to relationship decisions is only valuable, or good as a matter of individual opinion, not as a matter of fact.
Read 19 tweets
Sep 29
1/
Actually, you kind of do need James Lindsay.

See, the problem is that the truth is the truth, and when it comes to understanding the academic and intellectual underpinnings of Postmodernism and Critical Theory Christians really do not have anyone of his caliber...
2/

who knows and understands the evolution of "wokeness."

Now, I am a Pentacostal, so you may dismiss me (fair enough) but the fact is that while you may not want James to teach theology, you almost certainly need him to explain Postmodernism and Critical Theory.

You may...
3/
Not want an atheist in your midst, and you may think "we don't need atheists, we have the Bible," that is not going to help you. Fully half yoyr seminaries fell to wokeness because they did not understand the enemy. James understands your enemy, and you cannot dismiss...
Read 7 tweets
Sep 28
1/
Everyone saw the video of @lizzo playing James Madisons flute on stage while twerking. And I'd like to say something about controversy and discourse around thag.

But first, there is another video of @lizzo playing Madisons' flute, and before I say more I want you to see it.👇
2/
This is the video everyone saw where she takes the flute, plays a coyple of notes, and the. Twerks while playing it.

Watch this, then I'll say a little bit about this.
3/
So after the twerking video went viral there was (of course) a hermeneutic and interpretive discourse of twitter about the symbolic importance of what @lizzo did.

Many people interpeted the video through the lens of race/social justice.👇
Read 25 tweets
Sep 27
1/
I would like to discuss a common tactic employed by Critical Social Justice activists (AKA “woke” activists). It is a tactic they use to make an unjustified accusation stick in the absence of and reason to believe the accusation.

It's called "Dirty Cop Logic"

A thread🧵
2/
You will have noticed that Woke activists routinely call slap people with label like racist, sexist, bigot, homophobe, transphobe, xenophobe, ethnocentrist, and fascist. One tactic woke activists use to make these labels stick is what I call “Dirty-Cop Logic.”
3/
Using the example of, what else, dirty cops, let’s take a look at a simple case of this tactic:

Police: “You robbed the bank.”

You: “I did not.”

Police: “That's exactly what a bank robber would say. I knew you were guilty.”

You: “But I didn’t do it. I never robbed a bank”
Read 22 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(