Thomas C. Theiner Profile picture
Oct 14, 2022 24 tweets 11 min read Read on X
The L119 and M119 howitzers donated to Ukraine - how do they work?

An artillery thread with too many videos 🧵:

In this video a Ukrainian gun crew is firing M1 HE projectiles with M739A1 point detonating fuzes at increment 7.
1/n
If the terms in the first tweet confused you, then please read my linked M777 howitzer thread below, in which I explain the four components needed to fire a round:

• projectile
• fuze
• charge
• primer

2/n
Before you can fire the gun it must be emplaced. This means turning the L119/M119's barrel 180° degrees, which requires to unscrew one wheel. The gun is then secured onto a round firing platform for improved stability.

(No worries: the wheel takes just 15 seconds to unscrew)
3/n
Now gun section chief and gunner sight the gun, while the rest of the crew prepare the ammunition.
Unlike 155mm ammo which is moved on pallets, 105mm ammo still comes in wooden crates, which contain two cardboard tubes.
4/n
Wooden crates, cardboard tubes - sounds ancient & it is. This ammo was developed in the 1930s for the M2A1 howitzer, which was extensively used in WWII.

Here is a photo of a US Marines on Iwo Jima with the same wooden crates & cardboard tubes Ukrainian crews handle in 2022.
5/n Image
From Normandy to Vietnam - the M1 High Explosive projectile, the M14 Cartridge Case, the M67 Propelling Charges and the M28 Percussion Primer were a mainstay of US Army and US Marine Corps artillery units.
6/n ImageImage
From 1964 on the M2A1 (later renamed M101) was replaced by the lighter M102.
In the late 1980s the US Army looked for a replacement for the M102, which was able to fire the semi-fixed 105mm M1 ammo family of the M101/M102.

Photo: 82nd Airborne Division M102 crew in Grenada.
7/n Image
Ultimately the US Army settled on a US produced variant of the British L119, which itself is a variant of the British Army's L118, which uses (in typical British fashion) a unique 105mm ammo.

The unique ammo is the reason the UK bought Australian L119 for Ukraine, because
8/n Image
there isn't enough L118 ammo, while there are millions of M1 rounds stored all over the world. More about the L118's ammo at the end of this thread.

Now that we know the history of the M119 and L119, and their ammo, let's have a look what is inside the cardboard tubes.
9/n Image
Each tube contains actually just two things:

• the projectile
• the M14 cartridge case

The M14 cartridge case (made from brass or steel) contains a M28 percussion primer assembly and a M67 propelling charge, which consists of seven individually numbered propellant bags.
10/n Image
The seven bags are tied together, in numerical order, with acrylic cord and assembled around the central primer flash tube: Increment 1 at the base and Increment 7 toward the mouth of the cartridge case.

The M28 primer assembly consists of a black powder filled perforated
11/n Image
primer flash tube, which is attached to a M61 percussion primer at the cartridge's bottom.

To fire a round the M119's firing pin strikes the M61 primer, which then ignites the black powder in the primer flash tube, which in turn initiates the propelling charges, which then
12/n
propel the projectile out of the barrel and towards the enemy.

The more charge bags you leave in the cartridge, the further the projectile will fly.

The M1 family consists of nine projectiles, which all use the M14 cartridge and the M67 propelling charge. Over time the
13/n Image
US Army introduced new projectiles with improved range, which use new propellant charges (i.e. the M913 uses a single M229 charge bag). But all of them use the M28 percussion primer and M14 cartridge case.

As Ukraine won't receive the new projectiles I will skip them.
14/n
Now let's look at the projectile.

A projectile will not detonate without a fuze. Fuzes come in separate metal boxes and depending on mission and type of projectile different fuzes are used: here M739A1 point detonating fuzes are mounted on M1 High Explosive projectiles.
15/n
Current M1 family projectiles are (incl. their max. range):

• M1 High Explosive (HE), 11.5km
• M60A2 White Phosphorus smoke, 15.1km
• M84A1 Hexachloroethane smoke, 11.5km
• M314A3 Visible Light illuminating, 19.5km
• M927 HE Rocket Assisted, 16.5km

16/n ImageImageImageImage
• M1064 Infrared illuminating, 19.5km
• M1130 HE Base Bleed, 13km

Point detonating (PD), time, proximity & multi-option fuzes exist, but i.e. only time fuzes work on illuminating projectiles.

So far we have only seen M1 & M927 projectiles with M739A1 PD fuzes in Ukraine.
17/n ImageImage
Now that the gun is set up and the fuzes are screwed in, it is time to make some noise.

The projectile is mounted onto the cartridge. If the projectile is not fired at maximum range the unneeded charge bags are left dangling from their acrylic cord outside the cartridge.
18/n Image
The reason being that the section chief can thus control that the projectile is fired with the correct amount of propellant.

In this video @173rdAbnBde gunners fire M84 HC smoke with M762 electronic time fuzes (set by hand) at charge 5. Therefore the section chief rips
19/n
charge bags 6 and 7 away before the projectile is loaded into the gun.

Once the gun is loaded, the breech is closed and the gunner pulls the firing lever. After firing the breech is opened, the now empty cartridge is tossed aside, and the barrel checked before the next round
20/
is loaded.

Well trained US Army gun crews can fire a round every 6-7 seconds... if they prepared enough ammo in advance.
This gun crew at Fort Sill sends 10 rounds a minute downrange.

21/n
Ukrainian L119 & M119 crews will achieve similar levels of speed (if given enough ammo).

Unlike L118 crews, who are slowed down by the unique British propellant cartridge, which is more complicated to check and load, and the need to ram the projectile into the barrel.
22/n
Both - the Australian L119 and the American M119 - which Ukraine received are excellent guns, even though they were delivered without the digital fire control system, GPS sensor, inertial navigation system, and fire control computer the US Army's newest M119 variant has.
23/n ImageImage
At the end of this thread I want to thank the media team of the @173rdAbnBde: 90% of all existing M119 videos were made by them.

And I suggest everyone follow @denintern, a Ukrainian gun section chief, who is right now bonking russians in Kherson with an Australian L119.
24/end

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Thomas C. Theiner

Thomas C. Theiner Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @noclador

Feb 2
Gripen fans continue to spam my mention with claims how fantastic Sweden's Bas 90 and Gripen combination is... and that it would work for Canada's North too...

Ok, let's quickly compare Canada's three northern territories (Yukon, Northwest, Nunavut) and Sweden... ...
1/6
Land area:
🇸🇪 450,295 km2 (173,860 sq mi)
🇨🇦 terr.: 3,593,589 km2 (173,860 sq mi)

The land area of just the three territories (without Canada's 10 provinces) is already 8 times bigger than all of Sweden...
(In total Canada's land area is 9,984,670 km2
2/6
(3,855,100 sq mi) or 22 times Sweden).

Population:
🇸🇪 10.61 million
🇨🇦 terr.: 0.13 million

Sweden's population is 81.6 times bigger than that of the three territories... and if you look at population density:
🇸🇪 23,6/km2
🇨🇦 terr.: 0,013/km2
3/6
Read 6 tweets
Feb 1
Saab loooves to tout the claim that the Gripen can "operate from dispersed air bases".

They do that, because they know no one of you knows what it means. And every time I see someone regurgite "dispersed air bases" (or "road runways" or "short runways") I know I am dealing
1/36 Image
Image
Image
Image
with someone, who knows absolutely nothing about the topic.
So allow me to take you on a deep dive into what "operating from dispersed air bases" actually means.
Let's start with Såtenäs Air Base in Southern Sweden - the most important Swedish air base.
2/n Image
When the Viggen entered service, Såtenäs received it first.
When the Gripen entered service, Såtenäs received it first.
When the Gripen E entered service, Såtenäs received it first.

In the 1950s Sweden developed the Bas 60 system, which would have dispersed the Swedish
3/n Image
Read 36 tweets
Jan 20
The 11th Airborne Division is the least likely to be used to invade #Greenland.
The division's deputy commander is Canadian. He is responsible for Operations. The 11th would have to arrest part of their own officers, before being able to plan a Greenland invasion.
Also
1/6
there are just 8 C-17 Globemaster aircraft at Elmendorf Air Force Base. The USAF would need to fly a dozen more up to Alaska, which of course Canada would notice. Then to reach Greenland the C-17 would have to cross Canada's North, which NORAD's Canadian officers would report
2/6
to the Canadian and Danish governments.

It is much more likely the US will inform allies that a brigade of the 82nd Airborne Division at Fort Bragg will fly to the Middle East, which means the air route will take them right over Greenland. And at Fort Bragg you also have the
3/6
Read 6 tweets
Jan 2
This is a typical clown tweet by someone, who knows nothing about WWII.

3 years before D-Day, the Soviets & nazis were in a love-feast, while the US had not entered the war; & when it did it had to cross an ocean full of nazi submarines to stage troops & materiel for D-Day.
1/14
And unlike the warmongering Soviets, which in June 1941 fielded 304 divisions, the US Army fielded just 37 divisions when Japan attacked Pearl Harbor (+ two Marine Corps divisions).
Before any D-Day the US Army had to start forming new divisions (38 in 1942 and 17 in 1943) &
2/n
then ship those divisions across the Atlantic, which was teeming with German subs, while the Soviets just used trains to bring troops and materiel to the front (& if the Soviet had had to ship troops across an ocean, they would have just accepted that a third of their troops
3/n
Read 14 tweets
Dec 5, 2025
The @RoyalAirForce - once the strongest air force in Western Europe... but now...

7 Eurofighter Typhoon squadrons are expected to fulfill the tasks, for which 35 years ago the RAF fielded 40 squadrons (31 active & 4 reserve + 5 shadow squadrons, which would have been formed
1/27 Image
from the personnel & fighters of the RAF's operational conversion units).

At the end of the Cold War these 40 squadrons were assigned to 4 commands, each with a specific mission & enough aircraft to fulfill their mission.

No. 1 Group was tasked with striking Soviet forces
2/27 Image
in Northern Germany, including with WE.177 tactical nukes.

The Group fielded 8 active, 4 reserve and 2 shadow squadrons, which flew Tornado GR1, Jaguar GR1A, and Harrier GR5 fighters (the reserve squadrons flew Hawk T1A). The group also included the RAF's 3 aerial
3/27 Image
Read 27 tweets
Nov 28, 2025
Since there are still people claiming the Gripen is the "ideal fighter for Canada"... here are the refueling stops the Gripen C/D needed to get from Ronneby in Sweden to Eielson Air Base in Alaska.

So of course this is an "ideal fighter" for Canada... as it will have to stop
1/5 Image
at every Canadian airfield to refuel...

For the curious ones:

On 13 July 2006 five Gripen C and two Gripen D left
their base in Ronneby Sweden. They refueled at RAF Lossiemouth in Scotland, then flew to NAS Keflavik in Iceland, where they refueled and stayed overnight.
2/5
On 14 July the Gripens flew to Sondre Stromfjord in Greenland for another refueling, then proceeded to RCAF Iqualuit in Canada for refueling and the night.

On 15 July the Gripens flew to Churchill, refuelled and then flew to RCAF Cold Lake, where they spent 16 July to rest.
3/5
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(