🚨About 80,000 Georgians have had their voter eligibility challenged so far this year — but the Peach State isn't the only place where mass voter challenges have surged. Here's what you should know.
🧵👇
A provision of Georgia voter suppression law #SB202 allows individuals to challenge an unlimited number of voters. Tens of thousands of challenges have been filed in counties like Cobb, Gwinnett and Forsyth. democracydocket.com/opinion/the-wo…
Mass voter challenges aren't new, but they have grown in recent years. Before the 2021 U.S. Senate runoffs in Georgia, a right-wing organization challenged the eligibility of over 364,000 voters — the largest mass voter challenge in Georgia history. democracydocket.com/analysis/voter…
Additionally, a conservative group recently announced plans to challenge tens of thousands of voters in 9 states: Arizona, Florida, Georgia, Nevada, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia and Wisconsin. democracydocket.com/news-alerts/co…
The group shared that it identified over 55,000 voters in Arizona, 125,000 in Georgia and 142,000 in Pennsylvania who it deems ineligible and plans to challenge. The group also encourages local "activists" to challenge voters.
Many of the groups behind these voter challenges use the U.S. Postal Service's National Change of Address (NCOA) database — where individuals file requests to forward their mail — as evidence that a person has moved and is ineligible to vote in a given jurisdiction.
Asking for mail to be forwarded doesn't disprove a voter's eligibility. Using the NCOA alone, it’s impossible to know whether someone has moved out-of-state permanently or has asked their mail to be forwarded for a myriad of other reasons.
The NCOA can capture students at an out-of-state university, members of the military, civilians deployed abroad or those who have simply moved elsewhere, but not necessarily out of the county or state.
Even when counties reject frivolous challenges, the effort threatens to overwhelm elections offices during an already busy time. If not stopped, these disruptive, and often discriminatory, challenges will likely endanger the rights of eligible voters across the country.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🚨BREAKING: Ohio Republicans are appealing the Ohio Supreme Court's decision to strike down the state's congressional map to the U.S. Supreme Court. Invoking the independent state legislature theory, the lawmakers claim that the OH Supreme Court can't block the congressional map.
Before this redistricting cycle began, Ohio voters approved amendments to the Ohio Constitution to ban partisan gerrymandering for their congressional and legislative districts.
The Ohio Supreme Court ruled earlier this year that the congressional map drawn by lawmakers violated the Ohio Constitution because it was gerrymandered to benefit Republicans. The court ordered lawmakers to create new fair districts. democracydocket.com/news-alerts/oh…
🚨⚖️COURT ALERT: The Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court will hear oral arguments today in a Republican lawsuit seeking to strike down #Act77.
Here’s what you need to know.👇🧵
In 2019, the Republican-controlled Pennsylvania Legislature passed Act 77, a major election reform law that enacted no-excuse mail-in voting. The law also extended the time period allowed to register to vote before an election, funded new election equipment and more.
In July 2021, a group of Republican state lawmakers, who originally supported and passed the law in 2019, filed a lawsuit arguing that Act 77 violates the Pennsylvania Constitution and should be struck down. democracydocket.com/cases/pennsylv…
🚨ALERT: U.S. Supreme Court vacates 3rd Circuit decision requiring Pennsylvania to count undated mail-in ballots. A lower court found that not counting these ballots violates the Materiality Provision of the Civil Rights Act. democracydocket.com/news-alerts/sc…
The ballots in question are cast by eligible voters, received on time, but simply lack a handwritten date on the outer envelopes. This date is NOT used by election offices to determine if a ballot is received on time and has no further administrative purpose.
The Materiality Provision of the Civil Rights Act protects voters from unnecessary disenfranchisement due to trivial errors — like accidentally omitting a date on a mail-in ballot envelope. democracydocket.com/news/this-civi…
🚨ALERT: Look Ahead America, a right-wing organization with ties to former President Donald Trump, announced plans for a “pre-election audit” of voter rolls in nine states that feature some of the most competitive elections this year.🧵 democracydocket.com/news-alerts/co…
The group plans to identify voters they deem ineligible in Arizona, Florida, Georgia, Nevada, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia and Wisconsin and ask state election officials to remove those individuals from voter rolls.
Additionally, and most concerning, Look Ahead America plans to share the names of voters they deem ineligible with “local activist groups” so that the local groups can challenge voters as well.
⚖️COURT ALERT: Today at 10:00 am ET, a panel on the Maryland Court of Appeals will hear argument in a lawsuit seeking to allow canvassing boards to open & begin counting received mail-in ballots before Election Day.
Here's what you need to know.⤵️🧵
Maryland election law prohibits canvassing boards from opening and tabulating mail-in ballots until 8:00 am the Wednesday after Election Day.
As more people vote by mail, the rule is causing a delay in election results. In the primary elections earlier this year, it took some Maryland jurisdictions weeks after Election Day to finish canvassing and tabulating mail-in ballots, delaying the certification of results.