5 reverse psychology tactics to close more deals (and become a master in persuasion):
1/ Ask "NO-based questions"
People feel safer saying "no."
They don't want to say "yes" and be responsible for the outcome.
Plus saying "no" makes them feel in control.
So instead of asking:
➔ "Would you agree to do X?"
You ask:
➔ "Would you be against doing X?"
People feel safer saying "no."
They don't want to say "yes" and be responsible for the outcome.
Plus saying "no" makes them feel in control.
So instead of asking:
➔ "Would you agree to do X?"
You ask:
➔ "Would you be against doing X?"
2/ The "negative" consequence of the positive
"Warning: If you apply the 5 tactics in this thread, you'll get more clients than you can handle."
The risk (more clients than you can handle) boosts the value of the thread.
It amplifies the believability of the statement.
"Warning: If you apply the 5 tactics in this thread, you'll get more clients than you can handle."
The risk (more clients than you can handle) boosts the value of the thread.
It amplifies the believability of the statement.
3/ Damaging admission
You take a "[positive statement] but [negative statement]", and reverse it.
Take:
➔ This will make you rich, but it'll take 10 months.
And reverse it:
➔ It'll take 10 months, but this will make you rich.
It now directs attention to the positive.
You take a "[positive statement] but [negative statement]", and reverse it.
Take:
➔ This will make you rich, but it'll take 10 months.
And reverse it:
➔ It'll take 10 months, but this will make you rich.
It now directs attention to the positive.
4/ "This is not for" statement
"This is not for entrepreneurs who don't have a high-ticket offer."
You see?
It makes your audience feel the need to qualify for the offer.
You don't work with everybody. You're selective.
And they need to fit the criteria to work with you.
"This is not for entrepreneurs who don't have a high-ticket offer."
You see?
It makes your audience feel the need to qualify for the offer.
You don't work with everybody. You're selective.
And they need to fit the criteria to work with you.
5/ Raise objections before they do
Present the objections yourself, and they'll feel certain that you have their best interest at heart.
"One common question I get all the time is [objection]."
"So let me clarify that to you: [tackle objection]."
Now you're on their side.
Present the objections yourself, and they'll feel certain that you have their best interest at heart.
"One common question I get all the time is [objection]."
"So let me clarify that to you: [tackle objection]."
Now you're on their side.
5 reverse psychology tactics:
1/ Ask "NO-based questions”
2/ The "negative" consequence of the positive
3/ Damaging admission
4/ "This is not for" statement
5/ Raise objections before they do
1/ Ask "NO-based questions”
2/ The "negative" consequence of the positive
3/ Damaging admission
4/ "This is not for" statement
5/ Raise objections before they do
That’s a wrap!
If you found this valuable:
1. Follow me @giannicara for more on persuasion
2. RT the tweet below to spread this knowledge:
If you found this valuable:
1. Follow me @giannicara for more on persuasion
2. RT the tweet below to spread this knowledge:
https://twitter.com/giannicara/status/1581269924185513989
I'm building the personal brand of a $150M entrepreneur...
While guiding 5 creators to get their first $10K on Twitter.
Take a peek at what's happening behind the scenes in my weekly newsletter:
getrevue.co/profile/gianni…
While guiding 5 creators to get their first $10K on Twitter.
Take a peek at what's happening behind the scenes in my weekly newsletter:
getrevue.co/profile/gianni…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
