In Schmitt's words, politics is "Friend-Enemy". But how can we “find our frens” among the anonymous inter-webs? Here are the things I look for, the “Fren Manifesto” in 20 parts. 🧵
Frens follow an ordered moral system consistent with the humanity's survival, independence, and communion with a Higher Power. 1/🧵
Frens understand modernity threatens human thriving, and the roots of this problem run through the presuppositions of the liberal world order itself. 2/🧵
Frens understand that part of the solution will be erecting boundaries (individual & collective) against modernity. Frens respect other frens boundaries. 3/🧵
Frens make promises and keep them. Frens ask for loyalty, and give it (when warranted). 4/🧵
Frens know their core loyalties and perscriptive moral system. When possible, they make them explicit (beware the “view from nowhere!”) 5/🧵
Frens try to understand other frens’ core loyalties not mock them. 6/🧵
Frens don't dox or harass. Frens don't direct cancellation efforts against non-public personalities or non-institutional targets. 7/🧵
Frens don't punch right, refrain from moralistic denouncements, reframe disagreements as intellectual issues. 8/🧵
Frens refrain from insulting the core loyalties of other Frens. Insults to wives, mothers, daughters, and religious divinities are fighting words. Be aware kids. 9/🧵
Frens are careful with insults directed at secondary loyalties (nation / race), which should be either obvious jokes or purely intellectual examinations (no spite). 10/🧵
Frens are careful not to counter-signal other frens. Don’t hop on the bandwagon of enemy counter narratives, disagreements should use different language, have different "ant smell". 11/🧵
Frens defend their own community, and respect the boundaries of other frens (individual and collective). A closed door is not an insult. Being a Fren doesn't mean you belong everywhere. 12/🧵
Frens are either strong enough to hold the line or prudent enough to make room for others who can 13/🧵
Frens de-escalate serious drama, dissolve disagreements, make differences in language and morality clear. 14/🧵
Frens are always building. Technology when necessary. Art when possible. Family and community as part of ordinary life. 15/🧵
Frens understand that self-improvement is a political act. Health (both spiritual and physical) is a primary political end. 16/🧵
Frens look for more frens when possible (build that coalition!) 17/🧵
Frens help other friends improve and take constructive criticism with humility. 18/🧵
Frens are forviging. We all make mistakes. 19/🧵
And finally, if all this is too complicated, we will recognize other frens "by their fruits". Be excellent to each other! 20/🧵
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I find Warhammer 40k fans who want “female space marines” fascinating since they seem to posses a total lack of understanding of both Warhammer and how “art” responds to modern managerial political pressure. I will explain. 1/🧵
The question was never “can there be female space marines”, GW can make whatever bad changes it wants. “Female space marines” will happen eventually. However, this change will kill the Grim Dark setting, turning 40k into another generic sci-Fi property like the MCU. 2/🧵
The core aesthetic of Warhammer is GOTHIC which relies fundamentally on CONSTRAINT, hard rules, and the unchanging nature of those hard rules. The setting doesn’t work without this. 3/🧵
Humility is good, no one can see the future. But count me among the respectful skeptics. While the progressive world-view is dying, I would be amazed if it doesn’t lash out a few more times. And each lash out will be increasingly extreme. Here’s why. 🧵
Saying “calling people racist no longer works” is tantamount to saying “racism no longer matters”, since the former is the enforcement mechanism for the latter. However, “racism matters” is a CORE religious principle of the post-war consensus, removing it has consequences 2/🧵
One of the most important things to understand about the modern GAE is that it made certain promises about what a secular post-racial society would look like, and those promises are not manifesting. “Racism” is the word we use to explain WHY the promises aren’t manifesting. 3/🧵
While I respect King Crocaduck (KC) as a good-faith actor. His project to define legitimate national identities is fundamentally flawed as it contains critical blind spots and standards working at cross-purpose. I’ll explain. 1/🧵
First, KC's two ambitions appear to be: 1. to define what is a sufficient condition for a legitimate ethnic/national identity, and 2. to revive what remains of American identity. A tall order. 2/🧵
For 1., KC's standards for legitimate identity come down to 6 points that broadly outline what people mean by ethnicity/nation, e.g. a common name, (myth of) common ancestry, and customs that outline such. Fine general definition. 3/🧵
Lol, well there goes another opportunity to “reach out”.
People ask me why I spend so much time with these Academic leftists who study the right-wing like @MattPolProf .
Really, it’s the dishonesty of their presentation, the Kayfabe. Do they believe it or are they grifting?🧵
Invariably, the presentation of their expertise relies on the idea that their work is an objective academic examination; both in what they are showing their readers and the conversations they are having with colleagues and students. This is merited work! 2/🧵
This is evidenced in their inevitable response to criticism: “your idea isn’t serious! You haven’t read enough! You haven’t put the work in! Read more books!” Of course, it’s never enough. Even if you read every book by Marx, there are always paywalled modern white papers. 3/🧵
The New Atheists gained their victories over modern Christianity not by showing the world that it was false, but by showing the world that it was spirituality weak. 🧵
Spiritual weakness (not physical weakness) is the one deadly quality that destroys religions. Christianity was built by the spiritual strength of martyrdom. It was undone by people that slouched into the moral frame of modernity 2/🧵
The New Atheists showed that Christian leaders could be cowed and lead around like show ponies for the entertainment of 14 year olds, just by demanding that they justify Christ’s mission by the standards of liberal post-modernity (an impossible task). 3/🧵
I want to frame this last tweet by Existential Comics. It somehow perfectly capstones an entire era of the internet that I used to occupy.
I must remember that here, but for the Grace of God, go I. 🧵
For those who don’t remember, EC was a “late to the party” web comic specializing in a certain genre: the pseudo high-brow strip.
Here the idea was to take a freshman-level intellectual concept, illustrate it in a silly context with exaggeration and breaking the 4th wall. 2/🧵
Really, only XKCD ever did this properly. And even then, looking back, a lot of jokes were lame and try-hard. EC comics took the final step to break the genre complete with many panels self consciously shoehorning into random crude concepts into philosophy. You see! Humor!