1) First statement is an outright lie. Social Security and Medicare contribute ZERO to the federal deficit. They're entirely paid for by FICA taxes, which can't be used for anything else.
1/8
Furthermore, that means cutting benefits will NOT reduce the deficit, because FICA TAXES CAN'T BE USED FOR ANYTHING ELSE.
Got it? Good. Let's go on.
2/8
2) Second paragraph: Social Security can pay 70%-80% of promised benefits FOREVER. They other 20%-30% can be made up by eliminating the income cap on FICA contributions. We DON'T have to reduce benefits as Republicans want to.
3/8
3) Third paragraph: Raising Medicare eligibility to 75 also raises the Soc Sec retirement age to 75, because otherwise retirees won't be able to afford healthcare--specially since Republicans want to repeal the ACA.
Fuck. That.
4/8
4) More on the third paragraph: Eliminating eligibility at age 90 is Republican Death Panels, intentionally punishing and killing Americans who were so self-centered as to NOT DIE. Republicans are anti-life.
Fuck. Them.
5/8
5) Taxing VA Disability and employer-sponsored healthcare plans will do NOTHING to help Social Security or Medicare, because those programs get NO money from the federal budget. Only from FICA taxes.
Which means...
6/8
... taxing VA Disability and employer-sponsored healthcare plans is intended for one reason only: to make these things more expensive for Americans, and thus to kill the plans, and to kill Americans.
Republicans want YOU to die. Period.
7/8
6) The final paragraph: NO. These proposals are designed to make die you desperate, impoverished, ill, and helpless, and to force you to work until the day you die, naked and alone.
This is terrifying.
8/8
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I will give you a definition from Wikipedia. The definition is accurate, but may be difficult to understand. So I will then give you an example.
Wikipedia says:
1/12
"The motte-and-bailey fallacy (named after the motte-and-bailey castle) is a form of argument and an informal fallacy where an arguer conflates two positions that share similarities: one modest and easy to defend (the "motte") and one much more controversial...
2/12
... and harder to defend (the "bailey")..."
Okay, here's a concrete example:
Transphobes hate trans people. They've elected a transphobe president, who signed an Executive Order, on his first day in office, that erases trans people from American law.
I remember growing up hearing my grammar school teachers talk about the importance of the "peaceful transfer of power." It thought it was silly to worry about that. Elections happen, the one elected is sworn into office. What's the big deal?
1/11
We now know the answer. It's a very big deal.
Before America, no nation had peaceful transfers of power other than hereditary transfers from a newly-dead monarch to a relative. Never before did leaders voluntarily, peacefully and under the rule of law hand power to rivals.
2/11
George Washington stepped down willingly after two terms. He didn't want a third term. He stepped down partly to prove it was possible for a Head of State to do that. It shocked the world when he did.
That mattered.
What mattered more was what happened four years later.
We used to have nightly news, and daily newspapers, that sought to inform America with accurate facts about real events.
Then networks decided to make "news" into a profit center rather than a public service. To do that, it had to be entertaining, not necessarily accurate.
1/6
Rupert Murdock decided to create a propaganda station on cable, that pretended to be a news network. He had to go to court to defend telling outright lies. His defense was that Fox isn't "news", it's "entertainment," so no one should take it seriously. That defense worked.
2/6
Fox--and the other "news" channels--are now, legally and officially, not news at all.
To compete, broadcast networks took the same stance. Let's shovel shit, and call it news, and get people riled up. Who cares? No one is supposed to believe any of it anyway.
I want to remind you of something Trump did in his first term.
When running for president in 2016, Trump declared he was smarter than all the Generals, and he had a secret plan to end the war in Afghanistan, much better than plan the Generals could come up with.
1/7
After being elected, Trump revealed his secret plan to end the war in Afghanistan.
His plan was:
He ordered the Generals to come up with a plan to end the war in Afghanistan, and have it on his desk in ninety days.
I'm serious. That was his secret plan.
2/7
Of course, we heard nothing else about any plan to end the war in Afghanistan. But Trump invited the leaders of the Taliban to Camp David, and released 5000(!) Afghani terrorist prisoners, one of whom went on to become the leader of the Taliban.
3/7
I'm suspect Trump is creating the Epstein Files controversy on purpose. It's a distraction from his rapid mental decline, and the incompetence of entire administration, and the horrors of ICE, and the stupid tariffs, and the wars he hasn't ended, and his constant criming.
1/6
He pushed the Epstein thing for years as a campaign issue, as a club to beat up Democrats, and just as a conspiracy theory to rile his base.
Remember, Epstein died in 2019, while Trump was still president, and Bill Barr was Attorney General.
2/6
If there were things embarrassing to Democrats in Epstein's files or in anything held by the FBI, Trump could have released it then--and didn't.
Is there Bad Stuff about Trump in those files? Maybe. If so, Trump is really stoopid for having made a big deal out of it...
3/6
Germans voted in 1933. Hitler was named Chancellor that January. He quickly consolidated power, and became a dictator. Germans did not have free elections until 1949, after Hitler and about 80 million other people had died.
1/4
Oh, there were parliamentary elections in Germany in the 1930s. They were shams, and there was no chance Hitler would be removed as Chancellor.
And remember, Hitler became Chancellor only after leading an insurrection and being convicted of felonies.
Sound familiar?
2/4
One more morsel. Everything Hitler did was legal. The repression, the concentration camps, shutting down the press, gas chambers, all of it. Because he had the laws changed to make it legal.