In a day of hot takes on the Vancouver election results, I'll attempt to raise the temperature, a lot.
The political centre carried the election, because the Vancouver electorate taken as a whole is centrist.
Ken Sim and ABC were the consensus choice of the centre. #vanpoli /
This was ground formerly held by Vision Vancouver, ground lost to the ether in the 2018 election.
With no clear home for centre voters in 2018, a mishmash of values and parties found themselves on Council.
And Stewart found himself Mayor, with a hot mess of a council. /
The extra hot mess NPA took little time to break into factions, and in this Sim, who barely lost to Stewart and got 5 councillors across the line, saw opportunity.
Rather than ride the baggage of the NPA a second time, or try to fix it, he created a new vehicle. /
Sim filled the centrist vacuum left by the collapse of Vision, and attracted the 3 best NPA councillors, who were also those with the most centrist cred, to his new ABC party.
And he was rewarded with the election of every single candidate who ran with ABC beside their name. /
The groundwork for this was laid by the founders of One City in 2014 - not content with Vision's moderate approach.
As One City gained momentum and COPE re-emerged, with the naive backing of the VDLC, the demise of the Vision centre-left coalition was set in motion. /
By failing to recognize the importance of compromise, moderation and holding the centre, the COPE/One-City left and their backers created the conditions for 2018, and in turn 2022. /
Extra hot take: In parsing the results on the left, there may well be successful calls for unity behind One City or a similar vehicle that is unwelcoming to centrist voters.
And so the left may solve its internal factionalism, but it will not bring the centre back. /
In this context, Ken Sim and ABC will have the opportunity to create a new centrist dynasty (this one leaning right rather than left as Vision did).
And the left can feel good about itself as a permanent opposition, not having the power to do anything.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1. The Cull report on the BC NDP leadership is thorough and detailed, and suggests a clear pattern of rule-breaking and dishonesty in the campaign of Appadurai and her eco-activist supporters.
2. If there were multiple candidates in the race, it is likely few would blink an eye at a recommendation to disqualify based on the facts and pattern identified by Cull. That there is only one has raised the temperature on this recommendation.
3. But the number of candidates should not influence a decision over the propriety or impropriety of a campaign. So Cull was correct to not allow the absence of candidates other than Eby to cloud her judgement of the facts before her.
So, yesterday, I posted an inflammatory thread about the momentum of Pierre Poilievre. It was meant as a cautionary tale about the need for progressives to see and understand where his momentum is coming from, and to meet Canadians where they are. 1/6
I used the term Trumpification - by that I meant the undermining of public institutions and blaming government for people's perceived ills. This is clearly a part of PP's message, and the most dangerous one. 2/6
Over the next three years, the NDP and Liberals, and their supporters have the very important job of not letting this message (which is wrong, but believable to many) catch fire. 3/6
Thread. With the @PierrePoilievre leadership campaign, we are witnessing the accelerated Trumpification of the Canadian conservative movement and the @CPC_HQ and a likely remake of the Canadian political landscape greater than the emergence of Reform in the early 1990s. 1/7
Despite the vast majority of his lifetime income having come from "the taxpayer" as an MP, he's cast himself as the outsider's advocate and is eating Mad Max's PPC lunch. He'll take the easy path to power, and it runs through disgruntled white folks. 2/7
Poilievre is the only senior politician in Canada that is "feeling the pain" of these folks. He's playing to their fears, uncertainty, and to their increasing difficulty in making ends meet. It doesn't matter that his solutions aren't workable and somewhat dangerous. 3/7