Mauro Gilli Profile picture
Oct 17, 2022 20 tweets 8 min read Read on X
Over the past months, air defense has received significant attention. In case you'd like to understand more about radar, jamming, decoys, surface-to-air missiles, and the like, here some sources I found very useful.
These are the works I have used for a lecture in a class I teach at @CSS_Zurich of @ETH_en with @alexbollfrass, @HerzogSM and @NinaSilove.
And that I have used for two lectures I gave last summer at Euro-Swamos organized by @Hertie_Security and @EISSnetwork with @Hg_Meijer and @mephenke.
I'd start from this article from 1999 that puts things in perspective and explains why air defenses posed a problem also for the US Air Force in the War in Kosovo.

airandspaceforces.com/PDF/MagazineAr…
Then, I would look at this book. It is very accessible, has some jokes, and some interesting anecdotes. Moreover, it will help you understand not only radar but also sonar. There is barely any math or physics, only some very introductory statistics. Image
(If you liked the first few chapters of Denny's book, you will like these two books, which provide an historical overview of the relevance of the electro-magnetic spectrum (mostly) through US experience). ImageImage
To understand radar, this is a great source to start with, if you do not have the basics - all you need is some physics and familiarity with math & stats. Older versions (co-authored by the late Toomay) are good too, but the 4th ed includes a discussions on countermeasures. Image
This is a great complement to the book by Hannes. Very accessible, it will explain some aspects much more in depth. And even though it is now more than 20 years old, it's probably my favorite "intro" book on radar. Image
Speaking about introductory books, Skolnik's Introduction to Radar Systems is considered the Bible. Some find Skolnik's book more demanding than the other two, but I guess it is a matter of preferences. Image
This relatively unknown report will connect for you radar engineering and air defense. it is more than 30 years old now, but the key principles are still valid, and are presented in a simple way (you will find also a general introduction of radar). Image
Speaking about air defense, this is a more recent report published by the US Army, which summarizes in a very accessible combined arms for air defense. Strongly recommended. Image
This is, by far, one of my most favorite works on air defense. It has some technical discussions, but it puts them together with air defense more in general. I consider it one of those works for which there is a "before and after". Image
This is another great source, an article by JHUAPL: it discusses air defense at sea, but the principles underlying it apply broadly. Look closely at the pictures, because some are extremely informative. Image
This short report by the Mitchell Institute provides an accessible summary of what integrated air defense systems are. Image
This report by Justin Bronk is also very useful. It does much more than the title suggests. Whereas it is focused on Russian and Chinese capabilities, it still provides a general summary and it has some really clear figures. Image
Speaking about air defense, this book will put in historical perspective the attempt to defeat them through suppression of enemy air defense systems. Image
Here we get more technical, so you might find it a bit demanding. But this book has so much it's difficult to summarize it. Written by a former Lockheed employee, it includes also detailed discussions about electronic order of battles. Image
This guy. As far as I know, it is the only book specifically on airborne radar out there. And it is one of those books for which I would recommend that you read both the 2nd & the 3rd version to appreciate how technological change has enhanced radar systems over the past decades. Image
This is a demanding book. I have read it some 6 or 7 times, and there are still parts that I do not fully understand. But it is the one that really helped me understand scattering and signal processing. Among "pros" it is considered the to-go book. Image
And if you do not have time to read all these works, with my co-authors, we have tried to summarized them in a recent article about the "Enduring Hider-Finder Competition in Air Warfare."

direct.mit.edu/isec/article/4…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Mauro Gilli

Mauro Gilli Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Mauro_Gilli

May 9
Non è alcuna verità storica. E' una visione del tutto parziale dei fatti.
La seconda guerra mondiale in Europa è stata vinta in particolare in mare e nei cieli, domini in cui l'Unione Sovietica ha giocato un ruolo pressoché nullo. Possiamo riconoscere il sacrificio umano dell'Armata Rosa (alleata dei Nazisti fino al 1941), ma non cambia i fatti.
In Europa, la WWII è stata vinta grazie a:
- il radar "centimetrico" che hanno vinto la Battaglia dell'Atlantico (insieme alla capacità di decifrare Enigma e ad al sonar attivo ASDIC);
Read 8 tweets
Apr 25
Orsini ha scritto un articolo delirante contro di me e @aa_gilli. L'articolo invece di rispondere a critiche fattuali che io e Andrea, in due thread diversi, abbiamo avanzato verso sue affermazioni prive di fondamento, si lancia in una invettiva verso di noi.
Orsini cerca poi, maldestramente, di riproporre nuovamente la sua speculazione per cui i sistemi di difesa iraniani riuscirebbero ad abbattere un F-35 a 300-400km di distanza.
Per Orsini, evidentemente, quando si solcano i confini iraniani, le leggi della fisica smettono di essere valide. Un po' come la pastella (grits) nella cucina del testimone di Mio Cugino Vincenzo.
Read 14 tweets
Apr 21
Mi è stato girato questo video del professor Orsini, secondo il quale la limitata risposta Iraniana all’attacco Iraniano è spiegata dal fatto che l’Iran ha sistemi di difesa antiaerea che possono “colpire gli aerei Israeliani a 300-400km di distanza, cioè è in grado di colpire...
... sia missili balistici di lunga gittata, sia i droni, sia i caccia di quinta generazione, cioè fondamentalmente gli F-35 americani, che sono i caccia più avanzati di cui Israele disponga.”

Non so neanche da dove iniziare. Se non fosse tutto deprimente, sarebbe divertente.
Il professor Orsini parla chiaramente di cose che non conosce, ma con tono sicuro e frasi ad effetto (invocando “la logica”) cerca di impressionare gli ascoltatori, e chi è in studio. Poiché c’è un limite a tutto, qui riporto un po’ di fatti e di “logica”.
Read 27 tweets
Apr 16
We live in an age in which nobody admits being wrong, so quite remarkable to read someone doing it. In this regard, I have a couple of points.
First, the paradox about the debate about missile defense and the F-35 (regardless of which side you take) is that the unconventional thinkers soon created a new orthodoxy.
Somehow hinting that missile defense could intercept ballistic missiles was considered heresy in some circles until just a couple of years ago. To say nothing about acknowledging some strengths of the F-35.
Read 11 tweets
Feb 14
Italy squandered 135 billion (yes, with a b) with its measures to promote growth during the pandemic. corriere.it/economia/finan…
In particular through the "Bonus 110" which literally covered 100% of costs for refurbishing houses and left some chips for banks. One of the most regressive fiscal measures to date. And one which is likely going to restrict any fiscal leeway for the next years.
Keep it mind next time Italian politicians complain about European fiscal rules and austerity, and they ask for more freedom in spending. They could have invested in infrastructure, education, kindergartens, hospitals, research. They decided to give free money to well-off people.
Read 4 tweets
Feb 10, 2023
Last night I read the Seymour Hersch's piece. I am probably late to the party and I am sure much more competent people than me have already take a stab at it, but here I wrote down a couple of points about the part on the activation of underwater mines.
Spoiler: it doesn't makes much sense.

If you haven't read Hersch's essay, here you can find it. To me it reads as a great Hollywood script, more than an accurate account of events. Below I explain why.
seymourhersh.substack.com/p/how-america-…
I will not focus on the detailed account of the meetings & similar. Despite being rather implausible (to start from the fact that one only source has all these details), this is not where the biggest problems are. Rather, with how the sabotage operation was carried out.
Read 26 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(