Democrats sometimes ask questions like “how did Mitch McConnell get away with keeping Merrick Garland off the bench but getting Coney-Barrett on? And getting Gorsuch and Kavanaugh through?
It’s really simple. Previous #Midterm elections had a lot to do with it.
Mitch McConnell and the Republicans took the Senate in 2015 because they won a four seat majority.
The margin of which was made up by close Senate elections in the 2010 and 2014 midterms. When a lot of people didn’t bother to vote.
Supreme Court vacancies occur on average every three years and four months (over the last several decades).
And when a vacancy occurred in February, 2016, Mitch simply refused to hold hearings. Because he had the majority.
And Mitch and the Republicans had the majority because among the small number of people who bothered to vote in key Senate races during those two midterm years, 2010 and 2014.
Many Democrats expressed outrage later. But a lot of them did not vote in the Senate elections earlier.
Okay, so now that Garland was not given a hearing in 2014, Gorsuch got to fill that vacancy that had existed for more than a year in 2016.
Then the next year Kavanaugh was confirmed with a margin that also came via close Senate elections in midterms in which many didn’t vote.
And then Coney Barrett was also confirmed by a margin that came via close midterm Senate elections in which a significant percentage of eligible voters didn’t bother to vote.
Voting matters. But not when you only vote for President or during Presidential Election years. A third of the Senate is elected every two years. Which means that half the time, half of the Senate is two-thirds comprised of people elected in midterm years. When fewer people vote.
If you don’t vote, don’t complain later.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Supposedly the 2017 tax cuts (for those who actually got a tax cut - mine went up) were supposed to stimulate job creation.
The problem with that, if you look at the jobs reports is that it didn’t, really.
The number of jobs added to US payrolls in 2019, right after the tax bill was enacted but still before COVID, was the smallest number of jobs added to US payrolls since 2011.
A lot of political analysts are very good at what they do and they make predictions based on the data available to them - polls and history for example.
But they don’t decide who wins. Voters decide who wins. It’s only over when everybody who decides to vote casts their votes.
If you’re discouraged about what the polls say and what the pundits are forecasting, there is something you can do about it. You can vote. And you can encourage other people to vote.
Many Americans don’t pay close attention to politics. They don’t understand the connection between voting and how the decisions that affect their lives get made.
You know that widespread fear of demographic change and that fear causing people to exhibit hateful and cruel (sinful) behavior is not a new thing?
Just look at the situation in Exodus Chapter 2.
"Now Joseph and all his brothers and all that generation died, but the Israelites were exceedingly fruitful; they multiplied greatly, increased in numbers and became so numerous that the land was filled with them.
Then a new king, to whom Joseph meant nothing, came to power in Egypt.
Is it possible for the parent of a biracial child to be racist?
Well, George Wallace had one. As did quite a number of outspoken segregationists. It was relatively commonplace.
Also, is it possible for someone to say things that are racially inflammatory simply for the purpose of getting elected even if they weren’t anywhere as racist as people thought they were?
Yes. George Wallace pandered to racists but wasn’t a huge one in private.
For as long as America has existed there have been people who have, for various reasons, compartmentalized their complex feelings on race.