1/13) The "United States Department of Naval Intelligence," an agency Bob Lazar claimed employed him for captive-UFO studies in 1988-89, has never existed, two key authorities on Navy intelligence history (both former 2-star admirals, one now the Navy's head historian) told me.
2/13) Bob Lazar, in muddled and conflicting statements, has claimed that a 1989 W-2 form from the IRS proved that he had worked for a "United States Department of Naval Intelligence." Lazar promotors such as Jeremy Corbell have made much of the document. #ufotwitter #BobLazar
3/13) But in a 10-19-22 email, Samuel J. Cox, Director of the U.S. Navy's Naval History and Heritage Command (NHHC), told me no such organization ever existed. "There has been no Department of Naval Intelligence, either external or internal to the Department of the Navy."
4/13) Prof. Tony L. Cothron, who as a two-star admiral was Director of the Office of Naval Intelligence 2006-2008, wrote to me (10-19-22), "I am not aware of any organization named 'Department of Naval Intelligence...[T]here was never a 'shadow' Department of Naval Intelligence."
5/13) Cothron added, "I was actually stationed in Washington DC in 1989 [W-2 year] and assigned to the Naval Operational Intelligence Center but working on a special assignment for the Director of Naval Intelligence. There was no 'Department of Naval Intelligence' at that time."
6/13) Recently, some people became excited at finding the phrase "Department of Naval Intelligence" in various old newspaper clippings and obituaries, captions for WW II ship photos on government websites, etc, illogically asserting such miscellanea somehow validates the W-2.
7/13) Navy chief historian Cox (who was the 2-star Commander of ONI in 2012-13) wrote: "References to the Department of Naval Intelligence in newspapers are inaccuracies that occasionally occur in press reporting...The Library of Congress reference is also an inaccuracy..."
8/13) Real govt agencies (even covert) produce warehouses of real paper documents, many of which are eventually accessible. None of the would-be Lazar validators have produced a SINGLE document created by the purported decades-old "United States Department of Naval Intelligence."
9/13) In the Navy, a small organizational component on a ship is sometimes called a "department," but that is orders of magnitude removed from the fantasy of a federal intelligence agency that remained hidden for decades, yet betrayed its existence in the writings of
10/13) newspaper court reporters, obit writers, librarians writing captions, etc. It is like claiming there long existed a large 51st state, so secret it is missing on every map, yet revealed in scattered clips, and on a form sent by the IRS to scientist-impersonator Bob Lazar!
11/13) In the real world, the OFFICE of Naval Intelligence (ONI) was formed in 1882. Prof. Cothron recommended as "the best source" on ONI's history the book A CENTURY OF NAVAL INTELLIGENCE by Capt. Wyman Packard (1996).
12/13) I found a PDF of Capt. Packard's book at the link below. In the book's 515 pages, the phrase "Department of Naval Intelligence" does not appear a single time. ncisahistory.org/wp-content/upl…
13/13) Enough on this for now... but more to come, in due course.
14/n) @richgel999 continues to assert that finding the term "Department of Naval Intelligence" in scattered places--e.g., SecureNinja site--is evidence that a super-secret intelligence agency has existed for decades. It's just silly. SecureNinja corrected within hours of inquiry.
15/n) Geldreich insists the secret agency has existed since at least 1943--79 years ago--yet he has failed to uncover a single memo, letter, or other document actually created by it. The idea of a real government agency producing no retrievable documents in 79 years is absurd.
16/n) On this topic at least, Geldreich's "research" involves implausible assumptions, breathless leaps of untethered speculation, serial non sequiturs, and unbounded subjectivity. I confess that his investigative style puts me in mind of the fictional Inspector Jacques Clouseau.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/11) JUST RELEASED: The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI) has released its explanatory report (No. 117-132) on S. 4503, the Intelligence Authorization Act. As I reported July 14 (see my pinned tweet), S. 4503 contains 31 pages of proposed new UAP-related provisions.
2/11) In the report, SSCI rebukes the DoD for slow response. "At a time when cross-domain transmedium threats to U.S. national security are expanding exponentially, the Committee is disappointed with the slow pace of DoD-led efforts to establish" the UAP office/mission set in the
3/11) NDAA enacted Dec. 2021. The three new UAP provisions proposed in S. 4503 are meant "to accelerate progress." (Note: SSCI adopted this report just before the Pentagon issued July 20 release announcing the selection of Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick as director for the office, etc.)
1/7) CONGRESS UPDATE: A huge government-wide spending bill unveiled 3-8-22, on a fast track to enactment, incorporates (as Division X) the long-delayed Intelligence Authorization Act (IAA) for FY 2022. This includes a UAP provision that was written before formulation #UFOTwitter
2/7) of the new "Gillibrand-Rubio-Gallego" UAP law (Sec. 1683 of Public Law 117-81), enacted 12-27-21. The IAA provision would NOT remove or nullify any UAP requirement of PL 117-81, but imposes two new requirements on the Dept. of Defense and Director of National Intelligence.
3/7) First, the IAA provision would require that all DoD and Intelligence Community components provide UAP data "immediately" not only to the central UAP office (now called the Airborne Object Identification and Management Synchronization Group, AOIMSG), as required by PL 117-81,
BREAKING: Just-released text of FY 2022 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA),H.R. 4350, already approved by the U.S. House of Representatives Armed Services Committee, contains a 571-word section to impose new obligations on DoD regarding Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP).
H.R. 4350 was approved by the full House Armed Services Committee on Sept. 2, 2021, by a 57-2 vote, but text has only now been made public. The House committee's UAP-related requirements differ from those contained in a proposed Intelligence Authorization Act (S. 2610),
approved by the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence in July. The two bills are not in direct conflict, but they take somewhat different approaches--the House language has more detailed substantive requirements on some points, but requires less frequent reports to Congress.
(1) @JeremyCorbell on "Talk Radio with Howard Hughes," 5-23-21: "Everything Bob Lazar has said has stood the test of time for over 30 years." Real world: After 32 years, there is a mountain of evidence that Lazar (fake scientist, felon) is a liar, but zero real evidence the
govt. has 9 intact alien craft, or that Lazar has alien super-powered "115" isotope as claimed. Each Corbell-Knapp "Bob predicted" claim collapses when examined. (2) Ex-Sen. Harry Reid said this month he doesn't believe the U.S. has alien debris-- that he's heard such #ufotwitter
stories only from "conspiratorialists," not "credible." Yet the Lazar-Knapp-Corbell story is that the govt. had 9 intact alien craft by 1988, and even a decade or more earlier. (3) Corbell: "Bob Lazar told us about these craft and how they operate in 1989." Corbell, in his
a broadcaster who for over 30 years has promoted the controversial claims of felon Bob Lazar to have worked on a secret government program studying captive alien spaceships, today threw new fuel on the fire by abandoning his previous claim to know the exact location of a sample
of an alien-manufactured isotope that is said to have uncanny powers to manipulate time and space. Knapp, whose Twitter handle is @g_knapp, has for 32 years promoted and shaped the tales of Lazar, who Knapp first brought to public attention in 1989. Lazar, then age 30, claimed
CONGRESIONAL UPDATE: Contrary to earlier pessimistic assessments, it now appears that the long-stalled Intelligence Authorization Act (IAA), with its UAP-related cargo, will be enacted after all. #ufotwitter
This is the bill to which the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI) last June linked a call for an unclassified UAP report in 6 months. The IAA now has been incorporated into a massive end-of-session bill, containing coronavirus-relief provisions, funding for
federal agencies through Sept 2021, etc. This 5,593-page package is referred to as "the omni." Unless something goes badly awry, it should be signed into law within days.