Andrew Perpetua Profile picture
Oct 21, 2022 39 tweets 12 min read Read on X
Update for October 20th ukrdailyupdate.com/updates/update…
Here is an update for the military situation on October 20th. I will not write about any possible future attacks from the territory of Belarus and will focus on Kharkiv, Luhansk, Donetsk, and Zaporizhzhia oblasts.

If you would like to view the map: map.ukrdailyupdate.com
Russia is hitting the border towns of Kharkiv with artillery, rockets, mortars, tanks, and aviation. In addition, they have launched several small attacks on the border town of Ohirtseve (1).
Ukraine held a bridgehead north of Kupyansk, but in recent days Russia has counterattacked and claimed to have pushed Ukraine out of the towns of Horobivka and Dvorichne (2).
In Dvorichne, Russia claims to have taken control of the train station in the middle of the town (yellow). Unfortunately, I have not been able to verify this claim, but it is plausible.
East of Kupyansk, Ukraine is steadily applying pressure to the east (3,4,5). Ukraine is heavily shelling the string of towns between Pershotravneve and Kotlyarivka, and in return, Russia is heavily shelling the area near Kyslivka and Kotlyarivka.
Near Lyman, Russia seems to have stopped their main attack west toward Torske, Terny, and Novosadove, but they are heavily shelling them.
The pink arrows represent recent attacks that are no longer known to be ongoing. The same applies to pale blue arrows. The meaning of “ongoing” is not a set-in-stone rule, and I am using it somewhat arbitrarily, so don’t read into it too much.
Near Siversk, Russia attacks Bilohorivka (6) and Spirne (7) to slow the Ukrainian advance. Unfortunately, I have very little news about either of these Russian attacks.
However, Ukrainian and Russian sources suggest Ukraine may be nearing the Lysychansk Oil Refinery, so maybe the Russian attacks near Spirne are not going well.
Russian forces are trying to find a way around Soledar after having been soundly defeated in the town.
To the northeast of Soledar, Russians are trying to go around Yakovlivka (8). Still, as I have written previously, it is difficult for Russia to go around this town because Ukraine controls all of the dominant heights in Yakovlivka itself and in Vesele behind it.
To the south of Soledar, Russians are also trying to push south toward Bakhmutske (9), but they do not seem to have had much success.
Russians proudly describe the fighting as “southeast” of Soledar. Emphasis on the east. The only thing southeast of Soledar is Pokrovske, implying that Russia does not fully control that town.
Here is a general overview of Bakhmut.
In Bakhmut, Russia is attacking Patrisa Lumumby Street (10), and they seem to have had some success. They claim to have captured the furniture factory (A) and the ceramic factory (B). Neither capture is confirmed. Ukraine controls the drywall factory (C) and the winery (D).
The fighting in this area is brutal for both sides, and there are a lot of casualties. Russia is pounding the area with heavy artillery.
On October 19th, Ukraine counterattacked in the direction of the asphalt factory (11), which Russia claimed failed. But today, October 20th, Russia attacked the asphalt factory (12).

In addition, there is ongoing fighting near the garbage dump (13).
South of Bakhmut, there is brutal fighting around Opytne (14). I do not have an update regarding the status of Ivanhrad expressly, so I assume nothing has changed.
But regardless of Ivanhrad (which is 1 street), the fighting in Opytne is brutal, and the situation is not great for Ukraine. There are a lot of casualties for both sides, primarily due to heavy artillery fire.
Russia is pushing west toward Klishiivka (15) and north toward Odradivka (16). Unfortunately, I do not have news about either of these areas.
In the New York area, Russia attacked the fortified train station in Mayorsk (17), New York (18), and, well, the Novokalynove area (19).
Mayorsk and New York have been on the front line for eight years, and I don’t have more to add.

Novokalynove, though, is a newer development. On October 18th and 19th, Ukraine claimed to repel attacks on Novokalynove.
On the 20th, Wargonzo, who is (no matter how much I hate admitting it) a somewhat reliable Russian source, claimed that Russia was assaulting Keramik, which is a tiny appendix on the rear of Novokalynove.
This assault implies Russia captured Novokalynove, which I have seen no confirmation of from any reputable source. I am skeptical, and I am trying to confirm the status of this area.
South of Avdiivka, Russia is attacking Opytne (20), where they claim to make little incremental progress “one meter at a time.”
To put it bluntly, Russia controlled a section of the town at one point, only to be driven back out in a counterattack. And that was weeks ago, and I don’t think they have gotten close to that level of success since.
Russia heavily shelled the southern part of Pervomaiske, leveling every existing structure (they were, at best, empty husks to begin with). The artillery forced Ukraine to withdraw from this southern section, and Russia at least superficially controls it (21).
Russia is also attacking Nevelske (22), Krasnohorivka (23), Marinka (24), and Novomykhailivka (25) without notable changes.
Here is an image of what I call “the southeast corner,” the area between Donetsk and Velyka Novosilka. Lots of artillery fire.
South of Hulyaipole, Ukraine is attacking Kostyantynivka (26). Ukraine is making progress in this direction, but it is slow. Hulyaipole is heavily shelled and targeted with S-300 missiles, one of which destroyed a school.
Orikhiv is suffering from withering artillery fire. Russia is shelling it for 5-7 hours per day. Ukraine is attacking south toward Robotyne (27), Nerserianka (28), and Pyatykhatky (29). Ukraine is progressing in all three areas, especially Pyatykhatky, but the progress is slow.
Zooming out, Russia is firing missiles and suicide fronts into Zaporizhzhia and the surrounding towns. On October 20th, Russia destroyed a school in Komyshuvakha with a missile strike.
South of Zaporizhzhia, Russia is adding reinforcements and building extra defenses in Orlyanske and between Mykhailivka and Pryshyb (the two highlighted areas). In Orlyanske the Russian soldiers were seen looting local houses, reportedly looking for food.
Reportedly, Russia moved a large column into Mala Bilozerka on the 20th and put the equipment near the wide part of the ravine in town. As the story goes, Ukraine struck this area with two volleys of MLRS (unknown type), and the surviving Russians fled south. This is unconfirmed.
There is heavy shelling on both sides of the Dnipro river near Nikopol and Enerhodar.
In the northern part of the Kherson region, there are many rumors about large Ukrainian attacks. I am skeptical that they are occurring. However, I know there is heavy shelling and a lot of Russian aviation.
Russia repeatedly hits Mykolaiv with suicide drones and missile attacks. Russia is heavily shelling the M14 highway and just east of the highway in the southern part of Myrne. They are also heavily shelling the area around Ternovi Pody.
That is all I have for today, and to make it easier to find #ukrdailyupdate

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Andrew Perpetua

Andrew Perpetua Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AndrewPerpetua

Jun 9
Seeing Russia use BM-35 to attack the front line is funny. These drones were supposed to take out Ukrainian logistics, the way ukrainian drones are destroying Russian logistics, but elon musk snapped his fingers and poof. Without America, Russian "technology" is garbage.
They use these things like molniya now. A mockery of their original purpose.
Whats funny is that Ukraine has taken their own Darts and Blyskavka and turned them into long range logistics hunters while Russia has them tied to the front line to blow up random houses.
Read 8 tweets
Jun 6
Russian telegram channels are going through their old videos editing out war crimes. Things they were once proud to show are being secretly removed. They apparently don’t realize their videos and messages are archived.
Example: here is a video uploaded April 10th, at 1:20 in the video you see of the deadliest terrorist attacks on Ukraine this year (filmed from far away, don't worry about gore or anything)
(i sincerely didn't think it would take telegram 1 metric eternity to download this video)

and here is the edited reupload, removing the terrorist attack
Read 7 tweets
May 23
For the past two years, we have discussed how Ukraine is building drones that can hit targets 100 to 150 kilometers away. These drones are being produced in enough numbers to disrupt Russian logistics. During this time, some people doubted this was possible, calling it too optimistic or asking, "Why can't Russians do the same thing?"

To me, the answers were clear. Ukraine has better technology across various forms of communication, either on its own or with allies' help. Starlink is one example, but it is not the only or even the most important one.

Ukraine also has more experience and stronger command-and-control systems for drones. While these systems are not perfect, they are better than what Russia has, especially at the scale needed for this kind of operation.

Ukraine developed many different technologies and weapons in parallel, and for a good deal of time, none of these projects had much, if any, impact on the war itself. So, for a long time, it seemed nothing was happening, and this, along with Russia's media narrative (and the profound willingness of people to fall for Russian propaganda), led many to believe Russia was inevitably winning, which was never true, and is certainly untrue now.

Now, these technologies and weapons have reached the front line at about the same time, within a few weeks or months of each other. Some are better or more specialized than others, and some will be countered or may fail. Still, the fact that they all appeared together makes it very hard for Russia to adapt and stop them.

Ukraine will be able to send very cheap drones with a range of over 100 kilometers into Russia's rear areas. These drones can be guided by many different methods to hit every important target at first, and probably, in time, every target.

Russia has already had to close some roads and routes because of the threat. This is just the start. The danger will only grow as Ukraine increases production over time. These drones are cheap and easy to make, and Ukraine will produce them in large numbers. Russia does not have any technology that can handle this threat right now.

SHORAD can create small protected areas, but if it is used often, it will eventually be destroyed.

Electronic warfare probably will not solve the problem, but it might help a little.

Nets along highways will help, but only slightly. And nets can pose risks and hazards of their own. When they collapse, they can close roads, forcing vehicles through chokepoints that can be mined and attacked.

Interceptor drones can work, but they need a lot of resources that would otherwise go to offensive operations.

The Russian military is dealing with a problem no army has faced before, and there is no clear solution. Their best option is to spread supplies across many vehicles and use every possible road and path to move them forward. However, this is very inefficient and only helps as much as Ukraine's drone production allows.
The "russia will figure it out" crowd should sit down and give me your list of excuses for how Russia still doesn't have heavy bombers after more than 4 years of trying to replicate them.
Russia doesn't have an answer to bombers or their own bomber. They have nothing. And you think they can solve strike drones? Something an order of magnitude harder to develop and harder to stop? On what basis do you think this? It is just cope.
Read 5 tweets
May 22
Russians waving flags in Verkhnia Tersa, a lesser known highly pro-Ukrainian town in Zaporizhzhia. I remember reading the news story about the first civilian KIA in this town, and how shocking it was to them, in 2023 I think. Seeing the place like this now is sad.

47.695845, 36.086336Image
Image
47.692360, 36.081397 Image
Image
47.692939, 36.084317 Image
Image
Read 8 tweets
Apr 29
Here is translated text from Al Ta about the situation in Ukraine. He is a Russian propagandist, a soviet anti-Putinist who views reviving the full Soviet Union (including Poland) as the primary number one goal of this war. He's also pretty honest about the situation. Its long. (racial slurs and whatnot are removed btw)
Preservation of one’s own forces and resources (including manpower).

On paper, everything looks neat and classical: we strike the enemy at its foundations and core, while we ourselves conserve strength and wait for the right moment for a decisive blow. But in reality, everything is both simpler and more complicated at the same time.

If you think through the basic principles of a classical war of attrition, then at the initial stage, when the enemy’s potential is being destroyed, when strikes are delivered against its economy, communications, and supply routes for raw materials and weapons, the side that holds the initiative should remain on the defensive, abandoning unimportant territories and максимально protecting its soldiers. This attrition is carried out through the remote destruction of the enemy’s potential.
Strictly speaking, the correct strategy in such a war should include:

1. Readiness for total and continuous mobilization.
We remember that this kind of war is one of mobilizing all the strength of the people. Total mobilization is necessary to achieve a manpower advantage, which should allow final military actions to be carried out quickly once the enemy’s ability to resist is completely broken. In addition, prolonged combat, even in a well-organized defense, still leads to losses, which are unavoidable. Therefore, there is a constant need to replenish the front with personnel.

2. Readiness for total destruction and the deaths of the enemy’s civilian population (and your own, if the enemy is not weaker than you).
It is extremely difficult, more likely impossible, to “delicately” destroy a country’s economic foundation. Therefore, a country that begins such a war must be prepared to act decisively and harshly. This is the price of survival.

3. Defense as the foundation of the first phase of such a war.
Preserving soldiers’ lives is the key to a future victorious offensive. It is physically impossible to conserve personnel while conducting offensive operations. Many are familiar with the standard ratios required for an attacking force to outnumber a defending one. Even taking into account more advanced and destructive weapons, the need for such a ratio remains, it will never be 1:1. In essence, the main function of troops (infantry supported by tanks, artillery, and aviation) in such a war is to occupy territories where the enemy can no longer resist. Frontal or stubborn assaults are not characteristic of a war of attrition.

4. Seizing territory in the initial and main stages of such a war is not the primary objective.
Territory should be taken either after the course of the war has been turned and the enemy’s ability to resist has been broken, or through the imposition of postwar conditions.

5. Emphasis on firepower.
The enemy should be subjected to an overwhelming barrage of destructive force using every possible means. Everything available should be directed at the target. Naturally, this places emphasis on highly destructive weapons: artillery and aviation. The nature of the current war has also added UAVs (unmanned systems). We already see strike systems in the air and at sea, and soon ground systems will be added.
The goal is to inflict unacceptable losses on the enemy before you yourself suffer unacceptable losses. If you like, it resembles a boxing match: both sides exchange blows, but in the end the stronger one wins. At the same time, for every artillery shot fired at you, ten should be fired in return; for every drone launched, ten drones should respond. Only this way.
Yet, for example, by the results of March 2026, “so-called Ukraine” surpassed us in the number of drones launched at our territory.
Each of you can compare these principles with what is actually happening at the front. After all, “we haven’t even started yet,” if some leaders are to be believed.
Read 9 tweets
Mar 30
I want to start by saying I don’t have access to official documents or meetings, so I’m piecing together their motivations based on what I observe and logical reasoning. Keep that in mind as you read on.

This year, Russia's goals are threefold. First, to capture the eastern bank of the Dnipro River. Second, to capture Kostyantynivka. Third, to capture Slovyansk.

Each of these goals has necessary steps. To capture the bank in Zaporizhzhia, you must first capture Orikhiv. To capture Slovyansk, you must first capture Lyman. You could argue that to capture Kostyantynivka, you must first capture Chasiv Yar.

These goals are very ambitious and, honestly, impossible to fully achieve. So let’s think of them as aspirations and focus instead on how close Russia might get to reaching them.Image
Image
Image
Ukraine launched several counterattacks in the Verbove and Ternove areas of Zaporizhzhia. They were quite successful, pushing Russia out of several settlements and possibly capturing some. This also threatened Russia’s main supply route to the west. Because of this, Russia has to do two things: divert resources from their main attack to stabilize the area and try to recapture this ground to keep pushing west toward Orikhiv. Meanwhile, Ukraine gains time to strengthen defenses, plan their strategy, and prepare for more counterattacks, something Russia worries about given their timeline.

This has already delayed Russia’s offensive by months, and it will take many more weeks for them to regain their previous position.Image
Recently, Russia tried an armored assault on Orikhiv, which failed badly (A). They also tried to advance through Mala Tokmachka (B) before, but that failed too. A direct attack on Orikhiv is unlikely to succeed without heavy losses, so Russia wants to avoid it unless they have no choice. Still, based on past experience, they might end up having to take the town this way.Image
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(