“Ungrading is a philosophy and not a practice, one bent on turning the tables in the classroom so that students can intervene in their own education.”
As @slamteacher points out, ungrading is not a “plug-and-play best practice.”
Nodding to Paulo Freire’s notion of the “student-teacher”, @slamteacher writes, “Ungrading is about rearranging the room, placing the teacher among the students and requiring steady engagement with one another. Teachers and students share both roles; they should learn together.”
In conclusion, @slamteacher writes, “What I really wish is that educators would climb aboard the student bandwagon.”
I’ve written previously about the danger of ungrading becoming a zeitgeist. “We can't simply take away grades without re-examining all our pedagogical approaches, and this looks different for each teacher, in each context, and with each group of students.” jessestommel.com/grades-are-deh…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
10 quotes (in no particular order) from almost 200 years that have informed my thinking about grades and ungrading:
“When the how’s of assessment preoccupy us, they tend to chase the why’s back into the shadows.” ~ Alfie Kohn
“Grading tends to undermine the climate for teaching and learning. Once we start grading their work, students are tempted to study or work for the grade rather than for learning.” ~ Peter Elbow
“The classroom remains the most radical space of possibility in the academy.” ~ bell hooks
hooks advocates for “continual self-evaluation” both of a student by the student and of a teacher by the teacher.
The digging in of heels reminds me of the time I wrote an anti-student-shaming piece and got barraged with attacks (for weeks) that I just didn’t get the joke teachers were making … about students. 😞
It’s simple: you don’t get to control when or how students sit in chairs.
And I can’t believe it needs to be said: you don’t get to use the ADA as an excuse to control when or how students sit in chairs.
The answer is not always fewer students. The teacher-student ratio depends on the notion that the teacher is “delivering” something to those students, whether that’s content, direct mentoring, etc.
But if we accept that the more important relationship is the one students develop with each other, then the quality of the community is more important than the size. Different communities function successfully at different sizes and at different times.
Lots of pedagogical approaches depend on having a critical mass of voices, collaborators, etc.
People continue to imagine ungrading is a stack of decontextualized "best practices." I've pushed back on that in every place I've talked or written about ungrading.
From one of my first pieces about ungrading: "There are lots of alternatives to traditional assessment and ways to approach ungrading."
"I am withholding the mechanics of ungrading deliberately here, because I agree with Alfie Kohn who writes, 'When the how’s of assessment preoccupy us, they tend to chase the why’s back into the shadows.'" jessestommel.com/why-i-dont-gra…
“The entire controversy seems to illustrate a sea change in teaching, from an era when professors set the bar and expected the class to meet it, to the current more supportive, student-centered approach.” nytimes.com/2022/10/03/us/…
As long as there have been cruel, standardized, high-stakes approaches to teaching and assessment, there has been significant and meaningful pushback: Freire, hooks, Dewey, Emerson, Elbow, Greene, etc. There is nothing new or innovative about treating students like human beings.
The article is also filled with blame the students moments like this one:
“This one unhappy chemistry class could be a case study of the pressures on higher education as it tries to handle its Gen-Z student body.”
I see lots of jobs at centers for teaching and learning. They’re essential for the health of our universities and colleges. I have yet to see a posting for a professor of #highered pedagogy who’d teach full classes for new/future faculty. It’s a shame and a missed opportunity.
Less than half of higher education faculty get significant preparation for the work of teaching. This is a systemic problem we can address by incorporating preparation in pedagogy in every graduate program and through a robust “first year faculty experience” at every institution.
Lots of money gets spent on retention at higher education institutions. This money would be much more effectively spent on assuring that every teacher gets adequate preparation and support.