1/ The Neolithic package in Crete appears for the first time around 7000 BC. in Knossos with a community of settlers from Western Anatolia, which did not know the technology of pottery (Pre-Pottery Neolithic).
2/The interesting thing is that recent surveys have shown that within the community, chipped stone objects were found that bear characteristics of the Aegean Mesolithic tradition,which means that this short-lived community came into contact with local Mesolithic hunter-gatherers.
3/ Crete has already been inhabited since the Lower Palaeolithic through the maritime migration of Neanderthal populations using improvised rafts and making use of the sea route Mani > Kythera > Antikythera > Western Crete > Gavdos.
4/ After a gap in the Neolithic presence in Crete, we have successive migrations of populations from Anatolia, holders of the complete Neolithic package, with the result that during the Middle Neolithic Crete has been completely Neolithic.
5/ During the FN - EBA in the Aegean (NE Aegean - Cyclades - Attica) a highly developed culture is created, which has influences from Western Anatolia, but also the Balkans and has as its main characteristics the development of metallurgy, navigation and long distance trade.
6/ From the FN to EM II, Crete, especially in its east, seems to have strong commercial, cultural and racial ties with the Cyclades (indications of marriages with Cycladic islands have been reported), ➡️
➡️ while in its interior there is a cultural and population homogeneity, despite some local deviations.
7/ When in the helladic area during the transition from EH II/III and similarly in the Cyclades, a strong cultural intersection / breach is observed as a consequence of a wave of destructions, in Crete a cultural continuity is demonstrated.
8/ The conditions of upheaval that are observing in the period before the establishment of the first palaces (EM III - MM I), is due to the intense competition of local elites for the power and not to the migration of new population groups. ➡️
➡️ Some of the achievements of the Minoan civilization are cultural loans from areas of the East through trade, contacts and man's need for progress and innovation.
9/ When the Mycenaeans first invaded Khania and Crete (<1450 BC) via the sea route from southern Laconia, they established an initial palatial administration in Crete that ensured military control of the main centers of the island.
10/ Until 1370 BC the Mycenaean control of Western and Central Crete was complete, while the local Minoan element had taken refuge in the east of the island with the Mycenaeans having no relations with this part of Crete.
11/ After 1240 BC we have signs of the collapse of the Mycenaean confederation (archaeological findings - Hittite texts) and the appearance of the first signs of insecurity in the Aegean (piracy / out control armed groups) ➡️
➡️ with Crete being one of the first areas which were affected, as indicated by the appearance of the first mountain refugee shelters (>1230 BC).
12/ Finally, as I mentioned the destruction of Troy VIi was due to attacks by multinational sea raiders and took place around 1210 BC. It is very likely that the majority of the raiders were wandering pirates of the Aegean and some of them have their bases in Crete.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ Around 1900 BC, the old Minoan palaces were founded in Crete and the foundation stone of the first European civilization was laid, which was based on a pioneering model of political and economic organization whose main axes were maritime dominance and economic penetration.
2/ The Minoans,having realized the strategic geographical position of their island in the middle of important maritime trade routes that connected the western lands with the Near East, transformed Crete into the main commercial hub of the Mediterranean, building a powerful fleet.
3/ The Minoan ships brought important innovations for the time in order to cross the open sea: They were made of cypress trunks, had a keel for stability and a narrow, aerodynamic shape to develop speed, had large square sails and multiple rows of oars, and were waterproofed 👉
1/ The Hittite texts demonstrate that the Hittite Empire was in a long-standing conflict with the Mycenaean Aegean, mainly due to the constant Achaean involvement in the affairs of the Hittite vassal kingdoms of Western Anatolia. Often the Hittite kings were forced to send 👉
👉 expeditionary forces to the region to defend Hittite strategic interests, suppressing instigated rebellions or stopping the penetration of Achaean military forces (Attarsiya, Wiluša). However, it does not appear that the Hittites ever attacked the Mycenaean Aegean itself.
2/In answering the question of why they never did this, we must first focus on the high strategy of the Hittite Empire and what its main strategic goals were. The Hittites had as the central cradle of their Empire their capital Hattusa and the surrounding areas of the highlands👉
1/Sicily has been a major trade crossroads since the Neolithic era,through which sea routes passed, connecting the peoples of the Eastern Mediterranean with the West and vice versa. The result of this event was the long-term habitation of the Sicilian land by a mosaic of peoples.
2/ Thus, when the Greek colonists arrived on the island after the mid-8th century BC, they found three population groups: the Sicilians in the E, the Sicanians in the C-W, and the Elymians in the NW. The origin of these peoples has been a subject of controversy since antiquity.
3/ The literary tradition has handed down to us several contradictory narratives, referring to mass migrations, often in the form of mythical tales. The best-known mythological tale is Minos' pursuit of the fugitive Daedalus in Sicily and the founding of Cretan cities there.
1/ Athens has been associated since antiquity with the city's patron goddess, Athena. However, although most people believe that the city was named after the goddess, perhaps the opposite was actually the case. The two words have a common root that is likely of pre-Greek origin.
2/ But let's start from the beginning. Long before the city of Athens became the dominant center of the region, its name was Actaea and it belonged to a wider community, Att(h)is < Attica. The inhabitants of Attica at that time were not Greek-speaking (pre-Greek substrate).
3/ Several scholars argue that both the word Actaea and Attica, and the word Athéne (Ἀθήνη), derive from the word Atthis through corruption. Athéne is the common root from which the word Ἀθῆναι and the word Ἀθηνᾶ came. So both the city and the goddess have pre-Greek origins.
1/ During the same period (1250/40 BC) that the major fortification works were taking place in Mycenae and Tiryns, and the hill of Midea was being rebuilt with new palatial buildings and Cyclopean fortifications, a new fortified palatial settlement was founded on the Acropolis.
2/ But who were the ones who built the new Mycenaean citadel Athens? The answer lies in the question of what purpose its building served. In my opinion, the Athenian elites had neither the financial means nor the know-how to construct such a project.
3/ So the project was designed and financed by a powerful Mycenaean actor outside Attica and he - according to the available evidence - was in Mycenae. The stakes were the limitation of Thebes' influence in Attica and in particular the exploitation of the mines of Lavrion.
1/ The Citadel of Dymaean Wall at the NW end of the Peloponnese has a special place in Aegean prehistoric studies, as it was previously believed to be proof (along with the Isthmus Wall) of the existence of a northern threat (Dorians) to the core of the Mycenaean palatial world.
2/ Recent field study has placed its presence on a more realistic basis. First of all, the human presence on the Hill of Kalogria where the Citadel is built bears evidence of human presence, residential remains and pottery, dating back to the end of the 4th millennium BC.
3/ The choice of location is due to its great strategic importance, at the intersection of the land and the sea, constituting a significant defensive stronghold and an ideal point of surveillance of the sea routes of the Ionian Sea, already since the end of the 3rd millennium BC.