The comment by Chris Mason that one of Starmer’s tasks is ‘getting rid of hostility to Jewish people’ is false.
There is no evidence Corbyn’s Labour Party showed any ‘hostility to Jewish people.’ The claims made by you in this regard have been comprehensively falsified.
One example of this falsification is the Al Jazeera documentary series ‘The Labour Files’. This contains hard evidence of fraud in your Ware Panorama.
This, for instance, where a Labour activist, Rica Bird, asking a Labour Party investigator, Ben Westerman, ‘Which branch are you from?’ becomes the question ’Are you from Israel?’
Ms Bird happened to record the interview, and her words are perfectly clear on the tape. There can be no further dispute about whether Westerman’s claim is true or false: Rica Bird’s tape recording shows it to be false beyond any reasonable doubt.
That’s just one example of many, and immediately calls into question the veracity of your Ware Panorama claims about ‘Labour antisemitism’. You used a liar, and his lie has now been made public. There is no legitimate dispute about this anymore.
In your response to my complaint, you say ‘As we’ve explained, we will not be commenting on the Al Jazeera series ‘The Labour Files’.’
You give no reason why you will not. You frequently comment on other broadcasters’ output - Love Island (ITV), to take just one example. bbc.co.uk/news/topics/cr… -
So there can be no legitimate reason why you refuse to comment on a documentary aired by Al Jazeera which incontrovertibly contradicts claims made by you in your (now infamous) Ware Panorama, and which you have used to claim there was ‘hostility to Jewish people’ under Corbyn.
Mason’s claim, therefore, that there was ‘hostility to Jewish people’ under Corbyn is plainly false and must be corrected. ‘Accuracy’ is a Charter requirement, and you are obliged under your Charter to correct any inaccuracies. You must now correct this one, on air and in print.
This is about your reputation. You have made a very serious accusation against a prominent UK politician and tens of thousand of people: that claim has been shown to be false. You must now correct it, or your Charter means nothing and your reputation is lost.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I watched an old episode of Twilight Zone last night. The story was a man who starts to notice people using words wrongly - 'dinosaur' instead of 'lunch', for instance - which accelerates until he can understand no-one and no-one can understand him.
UK politics is like this now. Nothing actually makes any sense, and those attempting to make it make sense are using language that means nothing.
‘Got the big calls right,’ for instance, means literally nothing. Johnson blundered his way through covid, slaughtering tens of thousands of our elderly as casually as he would order a bottle of champagne, and flinging tens of billions of pounds away in corrupt deals.
'Far more powerful is Berger’s chilling account... of buckling under the weight of anti-Semitic abuse as an MP in Jeremy Corbyn’s Labour Party.'
Come on here and try that old cobblers, @FionaLondonarts. See how far you get. Dare you. #ItWasAScam inews.co.uk/culture/arts/j…
That whole 'Labour antisemitism crisis' narrative beloved of Freedland and Oberman and the rest - and, apparently, you also - has been so comprehensively debunked that clinging ono it starts to look pathological.
Here's some hard, cold evidence of fraud:
There's plenty more where that came from.
Here are ten more, including Freedland's 'irony' smear, which is *right there in the Royal Court blurb*.
Now Al Jazeera’s Labour Files have delivered the coup-de-grace to the ‘antisemitism crisis’ narrative, we enter a new phase, an uneasy stand-off between reality and what we see in the papers.
There are fairly obvious reasons why Starmer’s party can’t acknowledge even the existence of these documentaries, let alone comment on their content, which is that they represent one of the most damning indictments of a major political party anyone has ever seen.
Starmer’s party became a sort of Poundshop Stasi. They stalked a Black member’s *children*. They compiled lengthy, detailed surveillance ‘reports’ on members who were any kind of a challenge to the suffocating Starmer orthodoxy.
Three years ago today, senior BBC presenter and former Political Editor Nick Robinson was forced to delete a tweet falsely accusing @Jackiew80333500 of antisemitism. His tweet also accused (then MP) Chris Williamson by association.
Robinson was forced to concede that the tweet gave an 'insufficiently accurate impression' of what @Jackiew80333500 said or, in less emollient terms, was a stupid and outrageous BBC smear.
Hi @tomhfh.
There are just two possibilities here: 1. You genuinely believe this to be true, or 2. You know it to be false but say it anyway.
Not sure which is worse, really.
Care to clarify which applies to you?
Just a wild guess, but I reckon you'd go for 1: 'I genuinely believe this to be true.'
But then we hit a problem: there exists no reason to believe anything of the kind.
Even BBC have been forced to admit there is 'absolutely no evidence' Corbyn is or ever was an antisemite.