1/ Your Ironman performance is 100% metabolically limited.
You can have the highest VO2max or the highest threshold power in the world & it means fat zero if your fat burning can't support it.
2/ Your daily nutrition sets the limit on your #FatBurning
If you give your body more CHO than you expend, it will always preferentially use it first & your fat-burning will always suck. In order to improve your fat oxidation, your daily nutrition must match your training output
3/ After nutrition's in place, your ability to burn fat at competitive outputs is determined by how much Z1/2 you do.
Slow twitch fibers preferentially use fat as a substrate. Fast twitch fibers preferentially use CHO. If you're training FT fibers, you're training CHO oxidation!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The geometry that all endurance athletes need to understand (with apologies to Osler)..
A brief thread 👇
The all too common pattern...
- Athlete begins aerobic base work & is frustrated by slow rate of improvement.
- Athlete ratchets up HIT & is impressed by how quickly they improve.
- The proverbial bubble bursts and the athlete is back where they started.
We could add an additional step here...
- Athlete doesn't learn their lesson & only remembers how quickly they initially improved with HIT and so returns to it with the hope of the same improvement!
Of course, they're further down their base triangle right now, so the peak is⬇️
While it depends on definitions to each of the above, generally VT1 is defined via the ventilatory equivalents method:
"A rise in VE/VO2 *without* a rise in VE/VCO2"
In practice, this means the grade of VE goes up, the grade of VCO2 goes up but the grade of VO2 remains the same
You can see this it the VT1 point in the chart above.
- VO2 (top line) doesn't change
- VCO2 (next line) changes course & approaches VO2 line
- VE also changes gradient (slightly)
Figured it might be helpful to put together a short thread on weekly structure: Some guiding principles and some of the trade-offs that come with differing ways to structure your week 👇
As you know, I adopt a "recovery on demand" approach to planning your week, i.e. taking recovery days/weeks when readiness is low, irrespective of availability on that day, e.g. you could give me 10hrs of availability on a day, but if readiness is low, you'll get a recovery day.
On the flipside, if your week is restrictive, we may encounter days when your readiness is great but we're limited in the amount of time you have available, so again you'll get a recovery (lower load) day.
The key to getting fitter long term is finding a balance between the 2
Many athletes who begin low intensity training are dismayed to see their aerobic E.F. (efficiency factor) numbers fall through the floor, concluding that this method of training is making them less fit!
Here is why this is an erroneous conclusion... 👇
Not all E.F. is created equal!
A 8km/h jog with a HR of 125 = 1.1 E.F
A 12km/h run with a HR of 160 = 1.3 E.F.
Conclusion: My fitness numbers are better when I do a lot of training around 160 bpm, right?
Wrong!
Assuming my resting HR is 50bpm, when I increase it to 125bpm, Only 75bpm out of the 125 are 'working beats' that contribute to forward propulsion. The rest are just keeping me alive! So, I'm actually getting 8km/h faster than rest from an additional 75 beats= 1.8 meters per beat