.@G_Zlauvinen: Russian behavior puzzling. We were expecting Ru delegation to be led by Deputy Foreign Minister Ryabkov, but Ru didn’t submit visa application for him. Still, probably didn’t affect final outcome. #nukecon
.@G_Zlauvinen: Even in the absence of a final document, we proved the system worked. States engaged in actual negotiations over all aspects of NPT implementation. #nukecon
.@G_Zlauvinen: Widespread support for greater transparency/reporting by nuclear-weapon states on disarmament. For the first time, China did not oppose calls for enhanced transparency. #nukecon
.@G_Zlauvinen: Also widespread support for risk reduction—reducing the risk of a nuclear detonation. #nukecon
Is the review process defunct? @G_Zlauvinen; A large multilateral process is never perfect. Moreover, among P5 and among non-nuclear-weapon states, there are differences in opinion. Even so, there was progress, including in strengthening the review process. #nukecon
.@G_Zlauvinen: Nuclear-weapon states always come with excuses about why the time isn’t right for disarmament. But, even under current circumstances, they must do better or other states might reconsider their commitment to the NPT. #nukecon
@G_Zlauvinen: I decided against calling for a vote on final document—it’s unprecedented as final documents have always been adopted by consensus—but it could be done according to the rules. States should consider this. #nukecon
@G_Zlauvinen: If Russia had not objected to final document, it would have been adopted by consensus. I had assurances to that effect. #nukecon
.@G_Zlauvinen: disagreement on the Middle East WMDFZ was not between US and Arab states but among Arab states and another regional state party. 🤔 Ultimately, the key actors didn’t want to be blamed for blocking consensus on another final document. #nukecon
.@G_Zlauvinen: States should choose and elect the next president ASAP to give him/her time to prepare. President should continue with virtual consultations not based on traditional regional groupings. #nukecon
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
.@rafaelmgrossi: Iran problem is becoming more and more “relevant” every day. (“I’m choosing a neutral word, ‘relevant.’”) #nukecon
.@rafaelmgrossi’s vision for IAEA: Use mandate to the full. Deal with tough problems. It’s easy to hold symposia on nuclear safety. But when a nuclear power plant is being shelled, the IAEA has to get involved. #nukecon
Welcome to day two of #nukecon! We’re going to discuss the deterrence and escalation implications of new delivery system technologies with @LauraEGrego, Greg Weaver, Sun Xiangli, and @ElenaChernenko.
.@LauraEGrego: New technologies won’t undermine U.S.-Chinese or U.S.-Russian mutual vulnerability, but could lead to escalation in crises because, for example, of the difficulty of distinguishing a space launch from a FOBs launch. #nukecon
Weaver: Maneuverability of hypersonic systems complicates assessing which targets are under attack.
FOBs/MOBs are more concerning. Potentially extremely short warning times; could undermine ICBM/leadership survivability. #nukecon
Final panel of day 1 of #nukecon. Under Secretary of State Bonnie Jenkins, @UnderSecT, and NNSA Administrator Jill Hruby, @NNSAHruby, are in conversation with @nktpnd.
.@UnderSecT: The predictability created by arms control is more impact than ever. #nukecon
.@UnderSecT: In scoping out possible future arms control, admin discussed wide range of capabilities with Russia (including hypersonics and cyber). Moreover, arms control is about more than limits; also transparency and norms (including in space). #nukecon
Now that the agenda for #nukecon has been fully announced, here is the gender balance of our speakers and panelists. Once again, a majority are women.
Female panelists: 53% (26/49)
Male panelists: 47% (23/49)
(1/9)
The % of moderators who are women (54% or 7/13) is essentially identical to the overall % of speakers and panelists who are women (53% or 36/49). (2/9)
And here are the geographic diversity stats:
United States: 55% (27/49)
Europe, Canada, Australia, New Zealand: 24% (12/49)
Rest of world: 20% (10/49)
First panel at #nukecon. Can the Ukraine war end without nuclear use?
@KoriSchake argues that if the U.S. gets intel that Russia is preparing to use nuclear weapons, it should provide that intel to Ukraine so Kiev can preempt.
.@PatPorter76: U.S. interests in Ukraine are limited. Needs to ask questions about which weapons to supply to Ukraine and what limits (including geographical) it should attach to supply.
As @MMazarr put, Pat is a looming presence over this panel.
Ash Carter will probably (and rightly!) be remembered for his public service, but don't forget his scholarship, which was excellent--and sometimes truly extraordinary.
For work on technology, it has a rare timelessness that makes it useful after 30 or 40 years. (1/n)
"Managing Nuclear Operations," which Carter co-edited, is a masterpiece--especially his own chapters. His chapter on communications for nuclear command-and-control is the best (unclassified) piece written on the subject. Period. (2/n)
His 1984 @Journal_IS essay on "Satellites and Anti-Satellites" was pathbreaking. Some aspects have been overtaken by technological developments, but you'll still learn much more from reading it than many of today's more breathless studies. (3/n)