Having taken a closer look at these awesome photos, a few thoughts on some of the details...
First, some great detailed shots of some of the gun towers built on each corner of all of the "Big 3™️" island bases. Here's one from Fiery Cross Reef. You can see clearly what looks like a transplanted naval gun turret, and an anti-missile CIWS.
Here's a shot of another gun+CIWS combo on Fiery Cross...
...based on those side and rear views of the CIWS, I'd say it's likely a Type 730 or 1130 CIWS, just like on the PLA Navy's combatants.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/4…
You may notice the island's CIWS mount doesn't have radars on top of it like on ships. I think they've moved the fire control radar higher up on the gun tower, where it wouldn't be subject to blast from the gun turret right behind it. Here's a set from Cuarteron Reef.
As for the gun turrets, my best guess is that they're something like the dual-purpose 76mm PJ26 mount, as carried on Type 054A frigates. Here's a comparison:
Back on Fiery Cross, we have this garage with super-tall doors. There are similar garages on each of the Big 3 (one has 2). In each case the tall doors face out to sea, and there are shorter openings on the land-facing side.
Over on Mischief Reef, you can see another one these sea-facing tall-door buildings, as well as the retractable-roof buildings that are also on each island.
My guess is that the sea-facing garages are for angled cruise missile launchers (for anti-ship YJ-12 or CJ-10 land-attack missiles)(left), while the retractable roof buildings are for vertical-launch SAMs (like HQ-9, right):
Some more good detail from the great photos: while it often looks on imagery like these islands are empty, as you can't really see people doing things, here we can see a car driving around Fiery Cross and someone walking down a street. It's not crowds, but it's also not nothing.
Here we have a great shot of a KJ-500 AEW aircraft on the ramp at Fiery Cross. Given the gray color scheme with subdued markings, I'm guessing it's PLAAF instead of PLANAF? (IIRC they're blue-gray)
As mentioned elsewhere, we also have this likely Y-8/Y-9 inside a hangar at Mischief Reef. Thought not 100% proof, this might be an indicator that patrol aircraft are now at least semi-permanently stationed there, instead of just on temporary mission-oriented detachments.
On the topic of aircraft, you can see in several photos that the Chinese have blocked the runway on Subi reef by placing what looks like luggage wagons in multiple spots. As a pilot, I can tell you this is an unsafe act, hostile to anyone else flying in the area.
You see, when you close a runway, if possible you're supposed to mark it as closed so that pilot know that it's not safe to land there. This is an international standard per ICAO, who recommends that runways be marked for temporary closure.
The reason this is important is that if you're a pilot in command of an aircraft in true distress, you're likely to look for the nearest available runway and take it. If you're busy dealing with an emergency, you might notice a big X on the runway...
...but you may not notice a luggage cart *deliberately* left on the runway 1/3 of the way down until it's too late & everyone dies. Now, ICAO says the X may be omitted if the reason is short duration & ATC can notify folks. But IMO that's for exigencies, not something like this.
I mean, what if the aircraft taking these pictures had an inflight emergency & really needed to use the runway, which was fouled *on purpose*? IMO this once again puts the lie to the idea these islands were built for the navigational safety of all. They're military bases, period.
One thing I forgot (I don't want to go all the way back & move every tweet down 1), assuming the Type 730/1130 CIWS on the corner of each island has its advertised 2500m effective range vs missiles, here's what the interlocking coverage looks like for Subi Reef, for example. 🖖
Here are some more details to flesh out some of what I provided above: thedrive.com/the-war-zone/c…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Tom Shugart ⚓️⚛️

Tom Shugart ⚓️⚛️ Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @tshugart3

Oct 26
PRC FERRY UPDATE: looks like one of China's PLA-associated vehicle ferries has left its normal routes across the Yellow Sea and is headed for southern China. Image
The ferry in question, Bang Chui Dao, has taken part in multiple PLA exercises, and appears to be one of the ones with a stern ramp modified to launch amphibious assault vehicles directly into the sea. More details here from @KennedyMaritime: jamestown.org/program/rampin…
I wouldn't have thought too much of this transit by itself, as without any other indicators the ferry might just be going to a shipyard for maintenance (as have others that have left the area that I haven't mentioned). Its stated destination is Guangzhou, in southern China. Image
Read 5 tweets
Oct 25
I put up this thread a couple of years ago when I saw some interest and large-scale (or so I thought at the time) dredging on Ream Bay, Cambodia, not too far from the Ream Beach naval base that has gotten a fair bit of recent attention. A few updates:
At the time I couldn't tell if this was going to be some sort of cruise terminal, useful for large ships, or something else. I figured out that a company called Canopy Sands Development was doing a nearby tourist development, and that its CEO is a notorious former PRC national.
Also at the time, Cambodia was denying that it had an agreement for a nearby Chinese naval facility, but we now know that of course was a lie. That being said, I don't see any signs yet that the dredging has much to do with the PLA. voanews.com/a/east-asia-pa…
Read 10 tweets
Oct 17
Spent some time looking around at some of China's roll-on/roll-off car carrier terminals - not their car ferry terminals, but the ones they use to load their pure car and truck carriers (mostly to export or import cars) on ships like this one: ImageImage
Looking at a timeline of imagery, I was quite struck by how much these facilities have expanded in recent years. Here's a terminal in Shazai, on the Pearl River estuary near Hong Kong, shown in 2014 and 2019. ImageImage
For a size comparison, here it is with the Pentagon's North Parking (a standard unit of measure for a big-a$$ parking lot). Image
Read 10 tweets
Oct 12
Pleased to share my update on the state of China's dual-purpose civil-military roll-on/roll-off vessel fleets, including a deeper dive into just how much sealift capacity they could contribute to enable an invasion of Taiwan.
Out today in @WarOnTheRocks!warontherocks.com/2022/10/mind-t…
For reference, here is my previous article on the topic from just over a year ago: warontherocks.com/2021/08/mind-t…
Key points: 1. My estimate of China's available civilian ro/ro shipping has grown substantially, both from discovering existing vessels I didn't catch in last year's survey, and via new construction. Image
Read 11 tweets
Sep 28
Impressive video that I somehow missed from almost a year ago of a Chinese roll-on/roll-off ferry, Zhong Hua Fu Zing, being loaded as part of a PLA movement exercise.
For those who doubt the ability of China's civilian vessels to carry heavy armor, note the numbers of Type 96 main battle tanks that are embarked, grouped together in long rows at that. Image
A few data points: the ship has 3000 lane-meters of vehicle storage space, which translates to almost 65,000 square feet (a lane-m is notionally 2 meters wide), and it cost 420M Chinese yuan in 2019. By my estimation, that works out to about $70M USD in today's money. Image
Read 6 tweets
Sep 27
Just a reminder that there were folks in 2016 who predicted that China's artificial island bases might just be washed away by typhoons...qz.com/745511/interna…
...and others in 2019 wrote that they were falling apart and sinking into the ocean: nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/sunk…
And yet, here they are in 2022.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(