Why is that so many advertisers have chosen not to fund GB News? Is it because of a "sinister" plot against the channel by #StopFundingHate supporters, as suggested in this article? Or might there be additional reasons for big brands to steer clear? 1/ archive.ph/2022.10.28-132…
Just last week, GB News was called out by leading UK Jewish organisations over its repeated use of a term widely associated with antisemitism. Is it any surprise that responsible advertisers might not want to be aligned with this kind of rhetoric? /2 theguardian.com/politics/2022/…
Soon after GB News launched, one of its own contributors quit, accusing the channel of "demonising trans people at every opportunity". Many LGBT-inclusive companies will be mindful of the risks of supporting an outlet with this track record. /3
GB News has repeatedly run inflammatory content aggressively targeting the respected climate change campaigner @GretaThunberg. How many mainstream advertisers would actively want to be associated with this? /4
The #StopFundingHate campaign is driven by its supporter community & heavily reliant on volunteers.
But the reason our campaigning works is that many, many people across the UK are tired of toxic & divisive media - and advertisers know this. /6 archive.ph/eR8IY
OpIndia is notorious for publishing toxic content like this. Now the Guardian is having to appeal to them to end their public attacks on a respected Guardian reporter.
If you work in advertising, today would be a good day to exclude Opindia.com from your online ads:
"Spreading hatred against Muslims within the majority community is what was happening there... I quit. I did not become a journalist to spread hatred" - ex OpIndia employee newslaundry.com/2020/01/03/fak…
Reading this Daily Mail headline - and the related wave of UK media coverage - you might easily get the impression that a teacher was jailed for mis-gendering his student...
Despite what the Daily Mail's headline might imply, the defendant was jailed for contempt of court, after defying a High Court order not to attend his workplace while under suspension pending the outcome of a disciplinary review: reuters.com/article/factch…
Britain urgently needs a media that informs rather than misleading us. It's no surprise that the UK press has regularly been found to be the least trusted in Europe reuters.com/article/factch…
Hi @AudibleUK - there's some more background here on the toxic Islamophobic "Love Jihad" conspiracy theory, which the Daily Mail has now been promoting: theguardian.com/world/2022/jan…
It's worth contrasting the Daily Mail's inflammatory article with the BBC's reporting of the same shocking story: bbc.co.uk/news/world-asi…
Following the appalling violent attack on author Salman Rushdie, today's Daily Mail asks "What's the difference between an Islamist fundamentalist and a trans rights extremist?", suggesting that "Where crushing free speech is concerned, they are very much on the same page"
How does the Daily Mail define "trans rights extremist"? Well, they have previously aired suggestions that Europe's largest LGBT campaign organisation, Stonewall, whose methods are entirely peaceful and legal - is a "trans extremist" group archive.ph/gZsxP
The year that #StopFundingHate launched in 2016, there were over 100 anti-migrant front pages across UK newspapers - most especially in the Sun, Daily Mail and Express. 1/
Together we've shown that when enough of us speak out, advertisers will respond - and it can make a real difference. In recent years, there's been a marked reduction in anti-migrant UK front pages. #StopFundingHate works: thedrum.com/news/2019/08/0… /2
But now the Daily Mail & other UK media have shifted towards a new target. They are repeatedly running toxic & inflammatory "clickbait" stories about trans people, and the problem is escalating. /3 pinknews.co.uk/2022/01/25/cou…