🐀 Profile picture
Oct 28 8 tweets 2 min read
As someone whose background is theatrical study and performance (primarily classical), I want to talk about the nature of adaption as it relates to well-known texts, and how the #iwtv writers citing theatrical experience as a requirement is key to understanding the show.
Adaptation is its own skill set and this is an adaptation. The contextualization of Louis' blackness and the explicit queerness is the result of creative choices from Rolin and his team and that changes the rules at a baseline for the entirety of the series as it progresses.
When working with classical texts like Shakespeare, you are saddled with hundreds of years of history and historical context inherent in the work. There are different versions, there are omissions, there are
a variety of scenarios as it pertains to framing, etc.
There have been thousands of productions of Hamlet and every production is different and thrilling and that in itself is the mark of its longevity. You don't go into it thinking, "Will it be the Hamlet I see in my head?" You don't go into any theatrical production that way.
What each individual director and actor chooses to pull from a production of a classical text is their own, that is sort of the point of seeing them done over and over again. Same text, different show, because of who directed it and their vision and assessment of the material.
A playwright understands this. Walking into this show with a lens of "correctness" is going to rob you of enjoying someone's interpretation of a beloved text. You don't have to like it, you can despise it. But "correctness" has little part to play in the conversation.
There are some productions of Hamlet I cannot stand, the way they're framed, the acting choices, the directing choices, etc. But that doesn't mean I hate Hamlet and that doesn't mean that suddenly the director doesn't understand Hamlet the way I do. It's just what your taste is.
Your own interpretations as a fan and the love and appreciation you hold in private doesn't suddenly become null and void in the face of someone else's when it's not aligned. They hold their own merit individually because they're your experience. To me, that's sort of the point.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with 🐀

🐀 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @gaymonstermovie

Nov 4
sometimes you guys post the most agonizing shit so fucking Casually and I just look at my screen like ImageImage
Rigjt in front of my salad? Image
This is me. This is who you’re hurting when you post your insightful commentary. Image
Read 4 tweets
Nov 4
last RT taps the sign aggressively because oh my god it’s like people don’t know how storytelling as a crafted process works anymore it’s ungodly weird to me to watch
“I don’t like them” good you’re not supposed to, their place in the story is antagonistic and the writer did it on purpose, Shakespeare wasn’t like “damn I hope people don’t hate Iago”
“Wow, I really don’t like how toxic Catherine and Heathcliff are???” Lmfao okay neither does anyone else in the damn book Cindy that’s the point
Read 4 tweets
Nov 3
she looked so glamorous 😭 ImageImage
They say so much about Claudia with her costuming, each episode has some insight with how they clothe her. Like, the most outright communication of her exploration of identity and self and age can be seen plainly in what she’s settled in with attire.
Child? Woman? Something else entirely? Torn between two extremes before she settles into being neither, because she’s forever caught between child and adult and she’ll never know forward motion, I’m gonna be SICK. ImageImage
Read 4 tweets
Oct 20
Thinking about how Louis describes his feelings for Lestat with romanticized narration - its emotional distancing, makes it a STORY. There's no "he used to snore in his sleep" or mention of domestic routines, outside of Claudia's POV. Seduction is easy. Real love? That's hard.
"Let the tale seduce you..." he says, all of his early narration is dripping with overtures of romanticism. But beneath that is the lazy Sundays, talking about books they like, punch-drunk laughter after a very long day. That stuff happened, but it's harder to face losing it.
The romanticizing of who Lestat was, his maker, his lover, this enigmatic presence in his life - it's another coping strategy. Hating him for all the wrong reasons in the first interview, refusing to look at the little things in the second. One side of the pendulum to the other.
Read 7 tweets
Oct 19
I have started… Good Omens
CHUCK??? CHUCK MCGILL???
Also, the little “bad at computers” guy is me, that’s my energy, just some guy that is bad at speaking.
Read 11 tweets
Oct 18
do you not see my vision Image
I can’t breathe I’m crying what was this fandom in 2004
blease o can’t beisbdkddbhd I aacant I CANT LOOK AT KT INTBSJEHB
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(