Earlier this week there was an article on how Russia was trying to leverage its power and resources, cornering Ukraine, by promoting (eg to Germany) the use of “blue hydrogen”.
But blue and grey are dirty hydrogen in respect of emissions
For my part, like many of us, I have been trying to work out how best to improve my own energy usage profile.
I was looking at solar panels but
1/ they are high cost right now - about £15,500-£16k for panels and a 6kwh battery; and
2/ In an all electric house, I would end up producing a lot of excess energy in the summer (with low financial return) when I don’t use it; and
3/ Very little in the winter when I do use a lot for heating, and would certainly not produce enough to make much of a dent in that and certainly insufficient to fill a battery for evening/ night time usage.
4/. Similarly friends have been looking at replacing their gas boilers and wondering about phase out timescales and whether they will convert to hydrogen. If so WHICH hydrogen (and see @EdConwaySky ‘s interesting article referring to home hydrogen systems?
5/ So I went back to this super helpful thread from April by @michaelujacobs which emphasised prioritising insulation first.
I summarised it quickly here.
Hydrogen was 4th in the batting order and then only under R&D for green hydrogen NOT blue.
By calling in some trusted people in the trades, I have discovered that I can markedly improve my insulation, certain windows, front door, parts of difficult to access roof space and by bumping up attic insulation & ventilation.
The cost of all that should be under £6.5k which seems a better bang for buck than solar panels to start with.
Similarly my friends are rethinking gas boiler replacements.
But a lot of the problem is who to turn to for high quality advice. Particulalry when it comes to boilers that are said to convert to hydrogen.
What hydrogen? And what onward installation work will be required?
Is it better to keep existing boilers limping on for 1/2yrs?
Having read @EdConwaySky article for a good solid overview of the different sources & types of hydrogen energy this @BylineTimes article about how Russia was trying very hard to leverage ‘blue’ hydrogen (undesirable from an environmental aspect) for both political power & incomes
For those looking at the lifespan of their current gas boiler this thread is worth a read. And look at the @theheatinghub website too for lots of advice and tips.
Well. When Truss was Foreign Secretary her phone hacked & up to a year’s messages downloaded by Putin spies
It is understood that the messages included criticisms of Mr Johnson made by Truss & Kwarteng, leading to a potential risk of blackmail. mailplus.co.uk/edition/news/p…
Johnson was told immediately, & it was agreed with the Cabinet Secretary that there should be a total news blackout. It is not a great look for the intelligence services if the For Sec’s phone can be so easily plundered for embarrassing personal messages by 🇷🇺 agents.
“Allies of Ms Truss said that she was worried that if news of the hack leaked it could derail her chance of claiming the Premiership, and ‘had trouble sleeping’ until Mr Case imposed a news blackout.”
“Soldiers of Ukraine's 72nd Mechanized Brigades were sacrificing themselves to stop the Russian advance into Kyiv near the town of Moschun, despite insane bloodshed.
In late February, in the first five days, we were so close to the downfall! “
“That would be the end of so many things so precious and dear to us, to my generation: the values of the EuroMaidan Revolution, all the democratic reforms, and the resurrection of modern Ukrainian culture.
“In April, 11% of positions in Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Trust were unfilled, a rate which had more than doubled in a year.
This month the CQC downgraded the overall rating of the trust from "good" to "requires improvement", with its surgical services rated as "inadequate"
CQC's head of its inspection said Gloucestershire Royal was "incredibly busy and we saw the impact that staff shortages were having on the service".
The anonymous medic said there was a sense of "denial and complacency" about the problems.
"I can't wait to leave this place,"
Curiously Starmer and Sunak share certain characteristics.
They both supported woeful leaders.
They are both hard working technocrats. Sober. Organised. Methodical. They both try to sell “a Brexit that works” for growth despite all the evidence it stifles growth.
Of course neither Corbyn nor Starmer tanked the economy.
They didn’t have the opportunity.
I think that Starmer is not ideologically driven on Brexit. Sunak is.
Just untruthful/ badly advised.
Starmer has been much closer to hardship and deprivation.
Also he has commitment. He did pro bono work (eg for miners, the McLibel case, I think for Doreen Lawrence). That really is putting your money where your mouth is.
By 2030, vulnerable nations are likely to face $290-580bn (£260-520bn) in annual climate "residual damages" – damages that cannot be prevented with measures to adapt to climate threats. By 2050, the total cost of loss and damage could rise to $1-1.8tn (£890bn-1.6tn).
Emissions from the US alone are estimated to have cost the world more than $1.9 TRILLION between 1990 and 2014.
China, Russia, India & Brazil a further $4.1 TRILLION in global economic losses over the same period.
“A 2017 report from the CDP, a non-profit, found just 100 fossil fuel companies are responsible for producing 71% of all global greenhouse gases emitted since 1988.”