November 27, 2024: Our X/Twitter account (@threadreaderapp) got hacked. Do NOT click on any of the scammy crypto links on our X account or send any coins to deceptive wallets.
1/24. Is Japan in a debt trap and is that trap now snapping shut? A long thread. We start with the Ministry of Finance's "Japanese Public Finance Fact Sheet' (a must read for everyone).
2/24. From this, one of the most scary charts in the economic world. Japan has run chronic budget deficits for years, with the result that its accumulated debt level has soared.
3/24. Total government debt-to-GDP has risen from 59% in 1990 (when Japan's bubble popped) to 220% today. How could this be sustainable?
4/24. Because as interest rates came down, debt-service payments fell. But if you keep adding debt, and interest rates can't fall any more, your debt-service burden at some stage rises. From the chart below, Japan appears to have hit that point.
5/24. Japan's total debt keeps rising because one third of expenditure is financed by bond issuance.
6/24. Surprisingly, Japan actually has quite a "small government" compared with other advanced economies. Further, expenditures are totally dominated by social security:
7/24. But if you have such a huge gap between revenues and expenditures (as is the case in Japan), then you will run large government's primary deficits as a % of GDP despite the small state:
8/24. And every time Japan hits an economic head wind, it enacts a fiscal stimulus package financed by bonds. This past week, here we go again:
9/24. If you study economic growth accounting, identities below are seared into your brain. Japan has generally kept 'r' (nominal interest rate) < 'g' (nominal growth rate) in most yrs due to BOJ's QE, but the debt-to-GDP ratio still rose on back of large primary deficits.
10/24. If 'r' should ever get above 'g', game over for Japan: it's debt-GDP ratio will explode out of control on rocketing debt-service payments. How could that happen? Either 'r' rises or 'g' falls. Unfortunately, Japan's horrendous demographic outlook means that 'g' will fall.
11/24. Near term, however, Japan's Achilles' heel is "r". Japan currently exists in an interest rate regime of financial repression; that is, "r" is set by the Bank of Japan. Zero at the overnight policy rate and 0.25% for the 10-year bond.
12/24. Note that longer-term bonds have a lot higher interest rate, as the BoJ does not (yet) target them:
13/24. At the end of March 2022, the BOJ owned 43% of outstanding government bonds.
14/24. Why are financial institutions so happy to accept such low yields? Because inflation has been non-existent in Japan since the 1980s:
15/24. How could equilibrium be upset? First, inflation could pick up & exceed the 10-yield govt bond yield of 0.25% & LT bond yields of 0.8%. It is doing just that, with the Sep number at 3.0% y/y (excluding fresh food 1.8%) from around zero last year.
16/24. The authorities, however, could respond to inflation fears in 2 ways: could direct insurance cos and pension funds to buy bonds anyway (Japan has history of directed finance). Or, the BOJ just buys every bond that comes up for sale.
17/24. Even if insurance cos & pension funds can't sell, there is a limit to how many extra bonds they can buy for asset-liability matching reasons. So the BOJ is the ultimate buyer. Is this sustainable? Let's follow the money.
18/24. When the BOJ buys a bond from the government, the government gets a matching deposit with its account at the BOJ. It can then go out into the market place and buy goods and services from corporates for its social security & other needs.
19/24. These firms deposit a portion of proceeds from selling their goods & services in their bank accounts or pay their workers, who deposit a portion in their accounts. These accounts pay zero, but who cares when inflation is zero? They are safe and highly liquid deposits.
20/24. Let's jump to Japan's Statistical Yearbook to see how quickly corporate & household bank deposits have built up.
21/24. From the "Financial Assets & Liabilities" page of the "Flow of Funds", corporate bank deposits have gone from Y202 trillion in FY 09 to Y293 trillion in FY 19 (latest year), +45%, & households from Y798 trillion to Y1,000 trillion between FY09 & FY19,+25%.
22/24. Over same period, Japanese nominal GDP has gone from Y529 trillion to Y558 trillion, + 5.5%. So build-up of bank deposits on corporate/household balance sheets has significantly exceeded nominal GDP growth, but UNTIL NOW we have had no inflation & no flight out of the yen.
23/24. This was a reasonably stable equilibrium since firms and households had no incentive to spend these deposits as long as there was a) no inflation and/or b) a stable yen. Both of these conditions have been breached, so the incentive now exists to get out of these deposits.
24/24. The BOJ then has 2 choices: raise interest rates, which puts government into a debt-service trap, with an accelerating debt-GDP ratio, or bring back capital controls to defend the yen once its FX reserves run dry. What will it do?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/16. Jeremy Grantham. Surely the greatest historian of bubbles wrote this article ("Waiting for the Last Dance") in Jan 2021 amidst the pandemic's monetary & fiscal stimulus euphoria. Nasdaq was at 1400, Apple at $128 and the meme stocks "to the moon".
2/16. Wow, what a bubble! Wouldn't see that again? But we have: 4 yrs on, Nasdaq at 2,000+, Apple at $228 & meme stocks? Well, aren't they all meme now? Rocket Lab at 20X sales (earnings? 'forgetaboutit'), Palintir at 45X, Apple at 10X. Back in the day, these were P/E ratios.
3/16. OK, let's adjust that Jan 2021 Nasdaq number for inflation (around 20%) and real GDP growth (about 10%). That gives us Nasdaq at 1,900. So we are now way past Grantham's "Last Dance" and appear to be heading higher.
1/13. Some comments about Japan and the carry trade. First point to note: back in 2021 there was no inflation. so BOJ could monetise the Japanese government debt with no consequences.
2/13. I go through the dynamics here. In short, government spending > taxation, so government borrows to fill the gap. The BoJ monetises the debt.
3/13. Goods & services bought by the goverment result in enlarged bank balances of firms and individuals. But they don't care about adding to their bank balances, even though interest rates are zero, since inflation is also zero.
1/16. The word here is "nominal". So, OK, you didn't get a housing crash in the 1978 to 1985 period, but you also got a huge jump in nominal incomes. Mortgages got inflated to nothingness (my dear-departed dad's mortgage in the UK included).
2/16. Like stocks, houses are currently wrongly priced. The discount rate has gone up (oh my f*cking God, it is actually a non-negative discount rate in real terms) and the implicit rent generated from the value of the house is low.
3/16. Now the housing dudes I follow are really split at the minute. @LoganMohtashami & @calculatedrisk say basically "steady as she goes". But @m3_melody & @VladTheInflator are saying the sky is falling down.
1/25. Apologies for the lack of tweets since the start of 2023. As with most people, I've been reflecting on what I want to achieve in 2023. This Twitter handle has been a labour of love and I never really expected to garner 18k followers or so in 18 months. But.....
2/25 ....it was really a "passion born in a time of Covid" where few people could get out much and were forced to sit in front of screens all day.
3/25 And ever since I was a teenager I've had a passion for the markets: the Great Game combining finance, economics, politics, sociology, psychology, the humanities & the sciences. Indeed, everything.
1/10. For weeks I've been reading books on both the French Mississippi & English South Sea bubbles of 1719/20. @ProfJohnTurner@wquinn05 compare & contrasts these bubbles in a chapter entitled "1720 & the Invention of the Bubble".
2/10. This period of financial history in France and England is so rich that I find it difficult to do justice in tweet threads. But the 2 authors give us the chart below to contrast & compare.
3/10. For sheer innovativeness and audacity I think John Law's Mississippi bubble takes the prize. The clincher for me is the fact that he created France's first central bank and then hijacked it to support his bubble fantasy.
1/4. Market continues to call the Fed's bluff. The Dec & Sep dot plots show this starkly. For Dec, the most dovish 2023 projections are the (only) 2 below the 5% target range (just below it at that).
2/4. Three months ago, not one hawk was above the 5% target line for 2023! Note that the most dovish 2023 projection in Sep (Brainhard?) has moved up by 100 bps between the 2 meeting from 3.75 to 4.75!
3/4. Over the past few weeks, I've read commentary that the doves will start to challenge J-Powell's tough guy stance over the coming FOMC meetings. Really? Such a revolt is nowhere to be seen in the dot plot moves.