1/24. Is Japan in a debt trap and is that trap now snapping shut? A long thread. We start with the Ministry of Finance's "Japanese Public Finance Fact Sheet' (a must read for everyone).
2/24. From this, one of the most scary charts in the economic world. Japan has run chronic budget deficits for years, with the result that its accumulated debt level has soared.
3/24. Total government debt-to-GDP has risen from 59% in 1990 (when Japan's bubble popped) to 220% today. How could this be sustainable?
4/24. Because as interest rates came down, debt-service payments fell. But if you keep adding debt, and interest rates can't fall any more, your debt-service burden at some stage rises. From the chart below, Japan appears to have hit that point.
5/24. Japan's total debt keeps rising because one third of expenditure is financed by bond issuance.
6/24. Surprisingly, Japan actually has quite a "small government" compared with other advanced economies. Further, expenditures are totally dominated by social security:
7/24. But if you have such a huge gap between revenues and expenditures (as is the case in Japan), then you will run large government's primary deficits as a % of GDP despite the small state:
8/24. And every time Japan hits an economic head wind, it enacts a fiscal stimulus package financed by bonds. This past week, here we go again:
9/24. If you study economic growth accounting, identities below are seared into your brain. Japan has generally kept 'r' (nominal interest rate) < 'g' (nominal growth rate) in most yrs due to BOJ's QE, but the debt-to-GDP ratio still rose on back of large primary deficits.
10/24. If 'r' should ever get above 'g', game over for Japan: it's debt-GDP ratio will explode out of control on rocketing debt-service payments. How could that happen? Either 'r' rises or 'g' falls. Unfortunately, Japan's horrendous demographic outlook means that 'g' will fall.
11/24. Near term, however, Japan's Achilles' heel is "r". Japan currently exists in an interest rate regime of financial repression; that is, "r" is set by the Bank of Japan. Zero at the overnight policy rate and 0.25% for the 10-year bond.
12/24. Note that longer-term bonds have a lot higher interest rate, as the BoJ does not (yet) target them:
13/24. At the end of March 2022, the BOJ owned 43% of outstanding government bonds.
14/24. Why are financial institutions so happy to accept such low yields? Because inflation has been non-existent in Japan since the 1980s:
15/24. How could equilibrium be upset? First, inflation could pick up & exceed the 10-yield govt bond yield of 0.25% & LT bond yields of 0.8%. It is doing just that, with the Sep number at 3.0% y/y (excluding fresh food 1.8%) from around zero last year.
16/24. The authorities, however, could respond to inflation fears in 2 ways: could direct insurance cos and pension funds to buy bonds anyway (Japan has history of directed finance). Or, the BOJ just buys every bond that comes up for sale.
17/24. Even if insurance cos & pension funds can't sell, there is a limit to how many extra bonds they can buy for asset-liability matching reasons. So the BOJ is the ultimate buyer. Is this sustainable? Let's follow the money.
18/24. When the BOJ buys a bond from the government, the government gets a matching deposit with its account at the BOJ. It can then go out into the market place and buy goods and services from corporates for its social security & other needs.
19/24. These firms deposit a portion of proceeds from selling their goods & services in their bank accounts or pay their workers, who deposit a portion in their accounts. These accounts pay zero, but who cares when inflation is zero? They are safe and highly liquid deposits.
20/24. Let's jump to Japan's Statistical Yearbook to see how quickly corporate & household bank deposits have built up.
21/24. From the "Financial Assets & Liabilities" page of the "Flow of Funds", corporate bank deposits have gone from Y202 trillion in FY 09 to Y293 trillion in FY 19 (latest year), +45%, & households from Y798 trillion to Y1,000 trillion between FY09 & FY19,+25%.
22/24. Over same period, Japanese nominal GDP has gone from Y529 trillion to Y558 trillion, + 5.5%. So build-up of bank deposits on corporate/household balance sheets has significantly exceeded nominal GDP growth, but UNTIL NOW we have had no inflation & no flight out of the yen.
23/24. This was a reasonably stable equilibrium since firms and households had no incentive to spend these deposits as long as there was a) no inflation and/or b) a stable yen. Both of these conditions have been breached, so the incentive now exists to get out of these deposits.
24/24. The BOJ then has 2 choices: raise interest rates, which puts government into a debt-service trap, with an accelerating debt-GDP ratio, or bring back capital controls to defend the yen once its FX reserves run dry. What will it do?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/25. Some push-backs on my Japan debt-trap thread are based on a misinterpretation of modern-monetary theory (MMT) (a lot of which, shock horror for FinTwit, I agree with). But, as Stephanie Kelton herself says, "MMT is not about removing all limits. It's not a free lunch".
2/25. And in more detail:
"Do I believe the solution to all our problems is to simply spend more money? No, of course not. Just because there are no financial constraints on the federal budget doesn't mean there aren't real limits to what the government can (and should) do...."
3/25. "....Every economy has its own internal speed limit, regulated by the availability of our real productive resources-the state of technology and quality of its land, workers, factories, machines, and other materials."
1/26. The Nobel Prize for Economics is rewarded to academic economists, not practitioners. So, Bernanke's work on the US banking system & the Great Depression helped secure his gong more than his leadership of the Fed. That said, theory has consequences.
2/26. In the Brookings press conference held to celebrate Bernanke's achievement, the very last question asked (from 31 minutes) gets to the heart of my critique of the Bernanke approach to bubbles. Bernanke reframes the question thus:
3/26.
"Should monetary policy take into account financial stability risks? Part of the problem.....is the calibration. I don't think we know very much about how changes in interest rates effect long-run financial stability,...."
1/11. My problem with Bernanke's Nobel: you can't pin a medal on a fireman who set the house on fire in the first place. Danielle @DiMartinoBooth agrees in a great podcast with @JackFarley96. But she comes at it from a slightly different angle than me.
2/11. So her view is that the institutionalising & fetishising of the 2% inflation target is what did it. Bernanke said "2% is our target, so we will do whatever it takes to get there". Slash interest rates down to the zero bound. That's not working? Let's do QE.
3/11. QE1 not working? Well, all we need to do is turn up the dial: QE2, QE3, whatever. A trillion dollar here, a trillion there, and soon we are talking about serious QE.
Let's have a bit of fun & look at the worst-case scenario for end-2023 S&P. We'll start with the S&P's rough all-time-high of 4,800 made on January 3rd of this year.
2/21.
What's changed since then.
1) Realization that insane negative risk free rate was a temporary blip.
I'll base my calculations on the risk free rate going from minus 0.5% to plus 2.0%.
3/21.
The 30-year yield is not far off 4.5% at present, & if Fed overshoots 2.0% inflation target slightly to average out at 2.5%, that real rate looks about right.
“Now that ‘the chairman’ is firmly in place . . . I have already received three ‘proceed’ instructions from various ultra-high net worth Chinese business families to execute their fire escape plans,” said Lesperance."
"China’s rich, he said, are not only worried about rumours of an official wealth tax that would replace informal “common prosperity” donations. They are also increasingly concerned for their personal safety, even once they have left."
3/3.
In some ways, it is hard to feel sympathy with the Chinese mega rich when in many cases much of the wealth has been accumulated via leveraging CCP connections & graft.
1/4. I never thought I would defend Liz Truss (the political equivalent of defending Jeffrey Dahmer), but I will. Her and Kwasi's budget showed that the "Emperor had no clothes". Gilts were priced off the wrong real interest rate.
2/4. Within the grand scheme of things, her unfunded tax cuts were no big deal: £10 billion here, £10 billion there is not real money! So the Kingdom's demise is not her fault.
3/4. The Emperor had no clothes in the gilt market before Kwasi opened his mini-budget mouth. If it weren't them, someone else would have exposed the Emperor's nakedness. Even hero-of-the-day Rishi "the adult in the room" Sunak would have to have muttered the words.