The 8-month study looked at humans who experienced mild to moderate CoV2. By the study's close, subjects still hadn't rebuilt their T- and B-cells. Humans need B-cells to make antibodies and T-cells to fight specific pathogens. The damage to the immune system is unprecedented. 1/
Dr Aj has warned against pursuing infection-derived immunity in children. He's also said Covid's superantigen (immune-harming feature), suppression of cell's early warning system and fast evolution means humans gain no benefits from infection 1/
Because of these strong statements opposing sending Covid to endemicity by infecting the youth, Dr Aj has been called a 'crank,' 'not galileo,' and criticized for not being a 'working scientist'—he got his PhD in T cell memory in 2018 and is a student. 2/
Dr Aj's statements have stood the test of time. He didn't need to work in a lab to see what was happening. Humans that have attacked him say:
◽️ Post-infection, Covid becomes like a cold or flu
◻️ Covid will evolve to be like endemic coronaviruses 3/
⚪️ Sato Lab: BA5 antibodies are helpless against BA2.75.
⚪️ Ho Lab: BA2.75 is even better at binding to the human cell (image)
⚪️ Reynolds et al: Hybrid immunity is a thing of the past AND learned patterns of vaccination/infection reduce protection against future infection 1/
Professor Vincent Racaniello called it nonsense, but now we can see that long Covid causes T cell exhaustion. The superantigen can have an internal cause, for example, Epstein Barr Virus, as Dr Aj et al pointed out in this publication: mdpi.com/2076-0817/11/4… /1b
Here's what Dr Aj wrote: Repeat infections will cause T cell exhaustion—in other words, you will get long Covid. Exhaustion is a process driven by persistent, chronic stimulation of your T Cells, as opposed to their initial over-activity. 2/
Experts have claimed that data on Covid in populations disprove the mechanism of severe disease through naïve T cell depletion. Here's why using data from just one demographic to disprove the theory is wrong: 1/
◽️ The data itself doesn't prove more severe reinfections don't exist. They exist.
◽️ Two conditions put you at risk for severe infection:
• Low naïve T cell count
• High count of T cells that are ready for activation doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.… 2/
Dr Aj even wrote that this would mean not all reinfections would be worse. The people saying the data disproves it clearly didn't read the paper and just reacted emotionally. 3/
Two years ago, Dr Aj described what causes severe reinfections and poor outcomes (decompensation) in people with insufficient numbers of naïve T cells. 1/
▫️The VA study supports Dr. Aj's theory with its outcomes in people with low naïve T cell counts.
▫️The Qatar reinfection study supports his theory with its outcomes of reinfections in young, healthy workers who have naïve T cells and don't have Long Covid.
🚩NOTE: Naïve T cells dampen activated T cells responses.
So WHY has Dr Aj been slandered and abused for predicting severe disease caused by over-activation and uncontrolled death of T cells? 3/
Articles like this ignore severe reinfections & poor outcomes (decompensation) that Dr Aj published on in 2020.
WHY?
It's inconvenient to tell people they can become very ill/die due to their immune profile. The data isn't in Aj's paper but is under peer review & predicted. 1/
Here is news describing the recent findings by the team at Washington University. This was very unexpected but not unexpected by Dr Aj (or his followers.😉) 3/