1. Carefully consider the scope and type of the project (if it is a journal article, conference paper, dissertation, presentation).
2. Consider carefully the primary and secondary academic fields relevant to the project.
3. Act as if you are a leading expert in the primary and secondary fields relevant to the project. You can proficiently explain the project using adequate technical knowledge and language.
4. Act as if you are an award-winning teacher who can break down extremely complex ideas into easily understandable language.
5. Keeping in mind the scope, type, and the academic field of the project, break it down in tasks that can be scheduled weekly. Do this very carefully. This breakdown should optimize for speed without compromising on authenticity of the project.
6. Breakdown the weekly tasks into subtasks that can be completed within a normal workday of six to eight hours.
7. Every subtask should be accompanied by one to two pieces of clear and actionable advice to carry out the subtask. Remind me constantly to focus on progress and not perfection.
8. While giving the schedule of the project, you must consider the importance of both mental health and the ability to meet deadlines. Strive to have a work-life balance.
2. Brainstorming Ideas
Start by asking a couple of “warmup” questions. This way you will get better suggestions. You can ask questions like, “Do you know about X?” and “Do you know about Y?”
Then ask how we can be related X with Y. After that ask ChatGPT to help you brainstorm research questions on the relationship between X and Y.
While brainstorming ideas, always start with a basic idea and build on that gradually.
Dr. Ally Louks's PhD thesis is set to be one of the most influential theses of 21st century. Puts forward an original argument with remarkable clarity.
Already has 85M+ views on X/Twitter.
Most people criticizing her don't understand her argument at all.
I have a PhD in literary studies, and in this thread, we'll do a close reading of her abstract to understand her argument in simple English.
Before we jump in, we need to keep in mind that a PhD thesis is written for a small group of 3-5 scholars.
These scholars serve as a candidate's supervisor and examiners. They are the only audience of a PhD thesis.
If you think you can't understand a PhD thesis, it's because you are not its intended audience.
Let's start with the title:
"Olfactory Ethics: The Politics of Smell in Modern and Contemporary Prose."
There are three important here: ethics, politics, and smell.
Politics here is not used in the sense of running the political affairs of a country. Here, politics means things related to power.
If something reinforces oppressive power strucutres it's considered unethical (e.g. a story that celebrates poor people being discriminated against or getting killed).
If something challenges these power structures, that's considered ethical.
Put simply, the thesis deals with the relationship between smell and power.
In literary studies, we don't look at how things are in the world. That's not our concern. That's the job of anthropologists and sociologists.
Literary scholars look at how things are potrayed in literature. We deal with representations.
This thesis looks at how the relationship between power and smell has been portrayed in modern (1914-1945) and contemporary literature.