Here's Robin Hanson, a colleague of the longtermist William MacAskill at the Future of Humanity Institute, imagining what a world full of simulated people (or "ems" for "brain emulations") would be like. The word "elite ethnicities" is striking:
Citing Nick Bostrom, the Father of Longtermism, Hanson adds that biotech may enable us to create super-smart designer babies, who would be good candidates to have their brains scanned and uploaded to computers (to live in a virtual reality world full of ems).
Indeed, Hanson claims that ems would be highly intelligent, reflecting the entrepreneurial spirit, freedom, etc. of what he describes as the "smarter nations" (you know which ones he's talking about).
Many "female" ems might be lesbians, Hanson argues, but "disproportionally few male ems may be gay." You really can't make this stuff up:
I could go on, but that's plenty enough for today. These excerpts are from Robin Hanson's "The Age of Em: Work, Love and Life when Robots Rule the Earth," published by Oxford University Press (@OUPAcademic). The point of the book is to try to picture what a world full of
uploaded minds would look like. It explores, in other words, the "world of digital people" possibility at the top of this image from Holden Karnofsky.
Note that MacAskill says in his book "What We Owe the Future" that Karnofsky's "influence on me is so thoroughgoing that it
permeates every chapter." These people are serious about such a future, and indeed many are eager to bring it about. #longtermism
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Here's what we know about Noam Chomsky's friendship with Jeffrey Epstein. My conclusion is that Chomsky has done a great deal of good in the world, but he's displayed a long pattern of extremely poor judgment and low moral standards in his personal life. A 🧵.
In an undated letter of recommendation, Chomsky described Epstein as “a highly valued friend and regular source of intellectual exchange and stimulation,” adding that they met “half a dozen years ago” and have “been in regular contact since.”
Chomsky corresponded with Epstein from at least 2015 to 2017, during which they met numerous times. “In March 2015,” the Wall Street Journal reported, “Epstein scheduled a gathering with Mr. Chomsky and Harvard University professor Martin Nowak and other academics, according to
If there's one thing that people ought to understand about Silicon Valley and the AGI race, it's that a lot of folks involved in that race are pro-extinctionists: they WANT to replace humanity with AGI asap. A short 🧵.
Jaron Lanier, the VR pioneer, reports in a recent Vox interview that many AI researchers in Palo Alto think that "it would be good to wipe out people" with AI. They also think it's "fundamentally unethical" to have "bio-babies," because the AI future is more important.
Here's Eliezer Yudkowsky saying that he'd "sacrifice" all of humanity to create superintelligent AGI gods. Yudkowsky has a forthcoming book on why we shouldn't build AGI *in the near future*--but in the longer term, he's fine with AGI usurping humanity.
I've been screaming about this for years: what many powerful people in Silicon Valley want is to replace the human species with a new population of digital posthumans in the form of AGI. This is the goal, and it's seen by many as the natural next step in cosmic evolution. Short🧵
Here are all the articles I've written about this so far. Pro-extinctionism is not a fringe ideology, but the mainstream within certain tech circles. But don't take my word for it -- listen to what these people themselves have said: techpolicy.press/digital-eugeni…
On the (descriptive vs. normative) digital eschatology that they accept and, in many cases, are actively trying to realize:
God damnit, @nytimes. I have been screaming about this for *years*. The TESCREAL ideologies are *pro-extinctionist*--they do not want our species to exist in the future. Here are just a few recent articles I wrote about this (below). Please take this seriously!
What is it about our present moment that has made pro-extinctionism so damn appealing? From the "Efilists" to the TESCREALists, VHEMT to e/acc, more and more people agree that Homo sapiens should soon expire. I wrote an article about this. A short 🧵:
It's important to note that there are many different kinds of pro-extinctionism. To understand this, consider two distinct scenarios of human extinction: one would occur if our species were to disappear entirely and forever, full stop. This is "terminal" extinction.