Weekend update. While the map is not changing a great deal (though it is changing) this week brings home the difference between what is happening on the direct battlefield, and what is happening behind with the preparations for battle (and how the latter determines the former).
Looking over the past three weeks, the front line has only shifted small amounts in the east (Svatove), center (Donetsk) and south/west Kherson. If you compare the large theater maps from @TheStudyofWar . you will see only very small alterations.
This lack of change masks the fact that both sides are involved in an intense struggle to determine the outcome of the battle through efforts directed long behind the lines. They are waging political/logistical strategic wars, the end result of which will determine the outcome
The Russian PLS war has three distinct tlements. They are desperately trying to shut down the Ukrainian power supply. They are having some (though not decisive) success. Was struck by this pictorial difference as shown by @StewartMcDonald
Iran is also reportedly supplying Russia with short range ballistic missiles (and the expertise to use them) and I wouldnt be surprised if attacking Ukrainian power becomes a key target for them (also a sign that Russia is short of its own missiles)
Ukraine is definitely trying to counter this campaign, and there are increasing calls to supply Ukraine with generators. Along with Air-Defense, they will be crucial to Ukraine this winter.
As well as the struggle over power, Russia is hoping to cause a political change, that would bring pressure on Ukraine to settle. The decision yesterday to end the grain agreement is one such step (though the less important--as the countries affected cant really pressure Ukraine)
They will be in the global south, many of whom have supported Russia in the war so far. Its hard to see, however, how these countries could actually shape the outcome of the battle.
Far more important, is the Russian hope that the US midterm elections bring Republican control to both the House and the Senate. Such a victory, but a party still dominated by its Trumpist core, would provide real hope for an eventual reduction in US support for Ukraine.
Now the GOP is hardly united on this--but it would be a sign that support for Ukraine is not to be taken for granted.
So the Russian strategic campaign involves power, global opinion and US support for Ukraine. Its clear its goal is to try and weaken Ukrainian resistance (which will fail) and potentially reduce the flow of support for Ukr and result on pressure on Ukr to cede territory.
The Ukrainian strategic campaign continues along its quite relentless path attacking Russian logistics and also to try and weaken Russia support for the war.
Certainly the most dramatic Ukrainian attack of the week was the naval/drone assault on Russian war shipping near Sevastopol.
These serve multiple purposes for Ukraine. They once again show the Ukrainian ability and determination to attack targets in Crimea (which had earlier been a Russian redline). They also open up important future areas of attack.
If the Russians reduce their naval footprint in Sevastopol, they will have to rebase withdrawing shipping away from Crimea. That means even less protection for the Kerch Bridge, and reduced options to attack Ukraine with missiles from the Black Sea.
Ukraine also continues its attacks on Russian logistical attempts to resupply Kherson.
Politically, while Russia wants to weaken support for Ukraine, the Ukrainian government is reaching out to shore it up in North America, Europe and others. Its interesting, for instance how the Ukrainians are courting the new Italian government and Israel.
The Ukrainian attempt to pressure Israel to increase support is really interesting. Its a carrot and the stick approach. Will be interesting to see with the increased support of Iran for Russia, whether is bears fruit.
So both Russia and Ukraine are investing great effort in these different strategic campaigns, to effect the flow of support to both sides, and thus help determine the outcome of the land battle. This while the land battle itself seems to still be tilting Ukraine's favor.
Worth noting two things. While the Russians still hold Svatove, the Ukrainians are moving to cut the roads in and out of the town. This is the normal Ukrainian method of not attacking a city directly, but cutting its supply.
And there are signs that it is beginning to cause some serious disruptions.
As for Kherson, it seems reports (some out of Russia) that the Russians were going to withdraw were a form of bluff (a bit what the Ukrainians did earlier). Theyve actually seemed to reinforce. Perhaps they wanted the Ukrainians to attempt a risky attack.
With the Russians there in force, the Ukrainians dont seem to be taking any risks. As its the most vulnerable area for Russian forces to try and hold, the Ukrainians seem to press slowly, and use range weaponry to extract a high toll in casualties.
I havent seen any breakdown, but Ukrainian claims of Russian casualties yesterday was a record. 950.
So we have the battlefield and the strategic fight behind the battlefield. Both sides are fighting in both arenas. If past history is any guide, ultimately its what happens in the strategic struggle behind the lines that determines the outcome of the battles.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Phillips P. OBrien

Phillips P. OBrien Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @PhillipsPOBrien

Oct 23
Weekend Update. Havent tweeted much in the last week as Ive been travelling and had alot of work. However the week in the Russo-Ukraine war can be divided into two areas, the attacks on Ukrainian power supply and the situation on the front line particularly near Kherson.
Maybe best place to start is the Russian campaign using air assets to target Ukrainian power generation.
These are clearly having some kind of impact on Ukrainian power generation, and there are stories of Ukraine have power outages and blackouts. theguardian.com/world/2022/oct…
Read 17 tweets
Oct 16
Weekend update, A relatively stable week on the ground in terms of map changes, so thought it would be worth reflecting on the ongoing air-war as it actually took a great deal of effort on all sides and can be overlooked.
The air war in Ukraine has ended up being far more complex and layered than expected. Going into the war, Russian supposed strength in fixed wing, missile, and UAV technology was considered a major reason the Russian armed forces should be able to conquer quickly.
However here we are almost 8 months in, and the defining reality of the air war is that the Russians have never been able to establish air dominance. The Pentagon spokesperson dwelt on that in the briefing this week. defense.gov/News/Transcrip…
Read 16 tweets
Oct 15
Seems to be reports coming in (Russian sources) that the Ukrainians are trying to move forward again in Kherson. Ukraine security has been so good, Russian sources are probably all we will have for a while—if indeed it’s even happening
Some Ukrainians (not official sources) starting to also say something is happening.
Read 5 tweets
Oct 15
This is a terrible but important statistic. There has been a discussion of the ratio of wounded to killed in this war. Often historically people have spoken of 3 wounded for every 1 killed. That ratio seemed far too high in this war (for wounded).
The claim that basically half of all seriously wounded die, however, is extreme. It means that the eventual killed (outright and from sounds) would be more than the wounded and surviving. That’s a shocking figure for a supposedly advanced military.
Attributed to the shoddy state of Russian military medicine, the lack of proper medical supplies and basic medical training (the lack of tourniquets and proper tourniquet training seems extreme) as well as the terrible lethality of modern weapons.
Read 4 tweets
Oct 12
Latest piece with @TheAtlantic has just appeared. Contrasts the two great operations of the last few days. The Ukrainian attack on the Kerch Bridge and the indiscriminate Russian bombardment of Ukrainian cities. theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/…
These operations highlight why Ukraine has the upper hand in the war and why the Russian military has suffered. The Ukrainian attack was well planned, executed and hit a target of great potential military/logistic value.
The Russian attacks are mostly erratic, indiscriminate violence against civilians that will weaken the overall Russian war effort.
Read 4 tweets
Oct 10
It says everything about the way Putin has waged this war that his response to a targeted attack against Russian logistics is a pointless missile attack that will make the Ukrainians fight harder and if anything speed up his defeat
Hopefully this will speed up the delivery of anti air/missile systems to Ukraine.
In case you had any doubts about the validity of Ukrainian targeting versus Russian.
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(