1/If Twitter proceeds to charge for verification, it will effectively deplatform (or demote) tens or hundreds of thousands of journalists, compounding the problem that citizens lack access to trusted, reliable information.
2/And yes, there are “journalists” who are verified who shouldn’t be endorsed, and that will also be a major problem, especially now. For my part, I had opportunities to pursue it years ago when it required pulling strings. I did not, as I didn’t think it was egalitarian.
3/And I figured I could wait in line until there is a fair, sane process. I’m still waiting. And for those that missed it, here’s my piece on what’s going on.
4/The amount of money that can be realized from charging for verification (tens of millions annually) pales in comparison to Twitter’s $3.7bn annual revenue, so it’s rather immaterial. The reason to do it is to harm journalism and promote nonsense.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/In the debate over the current global order or a “multipolar world,” at issue is who dictates the terms of the latter. Right now we are largely ceding that task to Putin, Xi, and Musk by failing to put forth a competing, compelling positive future vision.
2/This is not to suggest that Putin’s actions or grievances are valid, as some have tried to do; they are not. He will, however, permanently alter facts in the world that make a return to the Feb 23, 2022 order impossible. Russia is different; Ukraine is different.
3/They are proposing a patriarchal, traditionalist, hierarchical anti-democratic vision of “rule by the rich” (or as they see it, rule by the wise.) We are saying “rewind to Feb 23.” But that’s impossible now. So: what’s the future vision for democracy? For the UN?
If you believed with high confidence dollars would soon be totally worthless, you might commit to purchase something expensive but useful for $44 billion.
When you buy a house on a 30 year fixed-rate mortgage, inflation makes the payments at the end quite affordable.
If you buy a $44 billion thing that itself can help you make it cost next to nothing by crashing the dollar, you might think it’s a very good investment.
As always: the fact that this is outlandish doesn’t mean it isn’t what they think they’re doing.
It doesn’t matter if it makes sense to you. What matters is if it makes sense to them.
1/Everybody get the picture? Bitcoin fanatics, countries that want to challenge the dollar, plus Elon and his Putin-shilling PayPal buddies. This is full-on global information warfare intended to upend US hegemony… calling it, wait for the NYT op-eds in 12-18 months.
Elon and Jack will work together to shut down the existing Twitter tech stack and move it to Bluesky. Anyone paying attention would know this. That’s why he’s freezing development on the existing platform. It will take a little time, but this is what they’re up to. Watch.
Since everyone has amnesia, here’s Jack in April. He thinks Twitter was a mistake and it should have been a protocol. I’ve known Jack personally since 2007. This is what’s going on.
Elon and Jack are the same entity, as far as this situation is concerned. Anyone thinking otherwise is simply delusional. All about longtermism and the “multipolar world.”
Elon is going to do with Twitter what Rebekah Mercer failed to achieve with Parler.
The only thing anyone needs to know to understand Musk’s Twitter plans is his long-standing relationship with Putin’s favorite Congressman, Dana Rohrabacher. Miss me with all other takes.
We are plunging ever deeper into total information and soon kinetic war. The literal hammers are coming for everyone soon enough, if we continue on this path.
There are a lot of opportunists looking to take advantage of Elon revulsion, and they’re no less vile. Strongly recommend folks steer clear of the “alternative” social networks. Either stay here or leave. But don’t pretend there’s a utopia just waiting somewhere.
That thread describes real problems with Tribel. CounterSocial is run by an anonymous persona and has serious governance and transparency shortcomings. Cannot recommend, for those reasons alone. Planetary may be a contender but may not be ready to scale. And none are likely ready
for prime time, from a scaling, content management, and international legal compliance standpoint. Anyway, it’s a very fraught and dangerous cesspool and the best thing is to avoid shady operators, including this platform. If you stay here, and many have valid reasons to,