President of the BCA: If you look over the last three decades at the split between profits and wages, it's been pretty consistent across Australia. #abc730
🤔
Speers challenged him on his pretty loose assertions, but it's hard to counter this kind of stuff in an interview without saying "ok let's look at this graph" which might be nice, but probably not practical
But the BCA Prez was right when he said "Profits are highly volatile". So let's look over the past 6 years then. That is plenty of enough time to remove the volatililty across industries
I use March 2016 as the startign point becaseu that is where in the first graph in the thread mining profits really drive up "total profits"
But it's clear it has not just been mining profits going faster than wages
When you look at a 6 year span business groups will then say "oh yes, but right now things are tough". And so when you look at right now they say "oh but profits are volatile"
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The condescending crud about Tar needing to get some excitement/buzz around it was maybe fine in the 1980s but we now get to read and hear all the news/podcasts etc about it at the same time the USA does
Eg here’s one of the most popular podcasts with an episode out this week
Labor supporters should look at the budget with clear eyes.
You want better policies? Keep pushing.
You want JobSeeker raised? Keep pushing.
You want Stage 3 dumped/changed? Keep pushing.
Keep demanding better
Do not say "whatabout the LNP?". They are not the bar. The bar that needs to be cleared is good progressive policies. Don't settle.
Sure this is the first budget and not everything will be fixed. But that doesn't give them a free pass. Progressive should always push for better.
Earlier this month the Productivity Commission put out a report that included this graph that made it look like productivity and real wages are growing in line (sort of) and that real wages are actually doing better (yes, I know!!)
Business groups loved it (shock!)
1/10
The good thing is the PC said where they got the data from we can reproduce it here... 2/10
Thing is there are a few funny (but not funny haha) things about the graph.
First it used 1960 as the base year. There's no reason for that but it does make it look like real wages have outgrown productivity.