For those of you that have asked me why I am convinced that cryptic lineages are coming from people, I can finally point to a pre-print with @dho and many fantastic collaborators in the UWisc and Wisc Public Health. medrxiv.org/cgi/content/sh…
It's pretty straightforward. We started with a sewershed that produces enough wastewater to fill about 30 olympic swimming pools a day. We sampled about a quarter cup.
But something didn't smell right.
It had a cryptic lineage, a SARS-CoV-2 RNA that was completely unknown.
For the next several months my collaborators continued to take sub-samples from throughout the sewershed and sent them to me to figure out which one 'didn't smell right'.
With each round of sampling we further narrowed the source of the cryptic lineage.
We finally narrowed the source to a single manhole, and then to a single set of bathrooms.
The sample from that bathroom contained by far the most SARS-CoV-2 RNA I had ever seen from a wastewater sample. We could have diluted it a million-fold and still detected the lineage.
This bathroom was not used by any rats or white tailed deer. The signal was coming from a person.
We also learned from this 'homogeneous sample' about the complete viral sequence. It was from a lineage that circulated over a year ago.
The person has been infected a long time.
We still don't know which person is the source (most were tested by nasal swabs and were negative), and more importantly, we don't know why the lineage is not spreading.
We suspect that the source is a long-term COVID infection of someone's GI tract.
There are still a lot of questions that need to be answered, but we have at least started to figure out what the right questions are.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I obviously knew there was some manipulation of post metrics on social media, but I really didn’t realize just how hard this platform slams the breaks on posts it doesn’t like.
Here’s my experiment.
1/
This weekend I posted 3 threads.
1. on a cryptic lineage 2. on H5N1 3. on seasonal respiratory viruses
Each time I posted the threads on X and bsky at the same time.
2/
The three threads each got roughly the same attention on bsky.
However, on X the first 2 each had hundreds of RTs and over 1k likes.
The 3rd was practically invisible. It had only 5 RTs and 28 likes after 2 days. Over 40-times fewer views.
3/
I’ve found cryptic lineages from sequencing wastewater.
I’ve found cryptic lineages from screening databases.
This is the first time I’ve found a cryptic lineage from social media.
This was an interesting story.
1/
Earlier this summer someone poked me to ask what the deal was with Coeur d’Alene, ID whose COVID numbers were consistently the highest in the country (by far).
I couldn’t find the post, so if this was you, please take credit. 2/
It did look suspicious, extremely high and sustained COVID levels, but my sources said they didn’t have any out of the ordinary case levels.
It’s been 2 days, 143 comments, and I’ve been called lots of bad names.
Here’s what I learned about protein based Novavax (NV) vs mRNA COVID vaccines. 1/
The pretty universally agreed on difference is that Novavax has fewer side effects.
If you have bad vaccine reactions, it is probably the better choice.
2/
There are other differences too. NV is protein based, so the immune response is antibody focused, while the mRNA is response is broader and produces both antibodies and CTLs.
3/
It’s been 2 years since BA.2.86 first appeared (and I’m give the variant update to SAVE on Monday), so I thought I would do a little summary about this era of SARS-CoV-2 evolution. 1/
SARS-CoV-2 lineages come up with new constellations of mutations in 3 main ways. 1. Sequential acquisition of mutations during normal circulation. 2. Recombination. 3. Sweeping new lineages (almost certainly from persistent infections).
2/
BA.2.86 was one of the sweeping changes. When it first appeared in Israel I thought it was a persistent infection, most of which never spread. Then it appeared in Denmark too. 3/