At Mayo Clinic, we classify myeloma patients into one of 6 non-overlapping categories based on primary cytogenetic abnormalities that occur at the MGUS stage. #MedTwitter
Needs testing beyond just looking for prognostic markers 1/
Because primary cytogenetic abnormalities occur at the time of origin of MGUS, even if testing was not done at baseline, we can classify myeloma based on a subsequent study.
Thus, a t(4;14) first detected in relapsed myeloma implies presence from the very outset at MGUS stage.
In contrast, secondary cytogenetic abnormalities such as gain 1q, del 17p, del 13, can occur at any time in disease evolution. Further one or more of these secondary abnormalities can occur in each of the 6 main types of myeloma & change their clinical course @NatRevClinOncol 3/
Thus a t4;14 myeloma can develop a del 17p. So can a t11;14 myeloma.
But t4;14 and t11;14 are mutually exclusive.
4/
The 6 primary types of myeloma differ some in clinical features, response to therapy, & prognosis. t4;14 myeloma is as much different from t11;14 myeloma as CLL is from mantle cell lymphoma.
Right now we consider all of them as one disease, but it’s an over simplification
5/
The future of myeloma will involve identifying optimal ways to manage not just these distinct entities, but go even beyond that. Such as managing t4;14 myeloma with del 17p differently than t4;14 myeloma without del 17p.
6/
As we learn more about the complex genetics of myeloma, in the future we may approach for instance t4;14 with a certain mutation pattern differently that t4;14 with a different mutation signature.
7/
Note: Presence of a cytogenetic abnormality from a clinical prognosis standpoint has a different implication depending on when it was detected. The effect of an abnormality on MGUS to MM progression is different than impact on MM prognosis @BloodCancerJnlnature.com/articles/bcj20…
The primary cytogenetic abnormalities are disease classifying as well as disease modifying. The secondary abnormalities are disease modifying, and the way and extent to which they modify will depend on the underlying primary cytogenetic type.
There more than 6 primary types of myeloma. But those 6 will comprise almost 90% of myeloma. The rest have IgH translocations involving a partner besides the 5 recurrent ones, or sometimes IgL translocations, etc
Failure to detect one of the 6 types is usually due to inadequate probes to look for them or low number of clonal cells in the marrow sample. Less often due to a primary abnormality besides the 6 main ones.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In the year 2000, a few of us attended an angiogenesis meeting in Boston. We were there to discuss thalidomide
But a side meeting that evening led to trial that went on to get Velcade FDA approved for myeloma. @NEJM
Story in thread.
Velcade (bortezomib) was first introduced to cancer research by the name PS-341.
It was a novel proteasome inhibitor developed by Julian Adams and colleagues a a potential anti cancer agent. @CR_AACR @AACR aacrjournals.org/cancerres/arti…
The ubiquitin-proteasome garbage disposal pathway in cells is a Nobel prize winning discovery.
Proteins that need to be degraded are tagged with ubiquitin tails. Tagged proteins are degraded by the proteasome complex. (This review has details )
The fascinating story of Thalidomide: how this most notorious drug on the planet, banned in the 1960s, made an incredible comeback and revolutionized the treatment of myeloma.
I will also highlight one person whose role is not recognized: Without Dr. Leif Bergsagel there will be no thalidomide for myeloma.
Read on #MedTwitter
The thalidomide story has many takeaways and lessons.
It shows drug development from bedside to bench and back to bedside.
It shows the power and impact of astute clinicians
It shows the power of investigator courage
The role of serendipity
But let’s start at the very beginning.
Thalidomide was synthesized in 1954, and then developed as a sleeping pill by the German company Chemie Grünenthal in the 1950s.
At the time the only sedatives available were barbiturates which had risks of intentional or accidental overdose.
Because thalidomide was felt to be a drug that cannot cause death due to overdose it was marketed as one of the safest sedatives.
By 1961, it was sold in over 40 countries as a sleeping. It was also tragically used to control morning sickness of early pregnancy.
AQUILA trial for high risk smoldering myeloma published in @NEJM today.
@thanosdimop
Personally for me, it is a huge milestone along 25 years of work that started in 1998. #ASH24 #ASH24VR
This story below may help those interested in a clinical trialist career. 1/
In 1998, as a fellow @MayoClinic I was keen to determine if early intervention delayed progression and improved survival in SMM. #ASH24
In 1999, with the help of Tom Witzig, I led a small phase II trial of thalidomide for SMM. @LeukemiaJnl 2/
I was then so fortunate to examine the natural history of SMM, with the legendary Bob Kyle. Honored to be last author on @NEJM paper that also provided data that most progressions occur in the first 5 years of diagnosis.
The start of the concept of high risk vs low risk SMM. 3/