Alright alright, we got the eucalyptus tea brewed, we have one of the Koala's go to modeling playlists cranking...it's time for a Whitehaven Coal $WHC.AX valuation thread
Have cash costs sliding as energy crisis "resolves" through the decade
30% cash tax rate
14MM equity tonnes per year through FY2050 (yea Gunnedah open cuts, etc.)
2/n
Figure
a) small guide cut this yr
b) Maules 30+, Narrabri '44 (close enough)
So yea no Vickery or Winchester but w/e
Capex 400/yr
3/n
Used a 15% discount rate, these are the NPV/sh for each case:
Remember NPV is a point in time today. Does not reflect if buybacks will be accretive or not (using June 30th balance sheet which was pf net debt zero share balance) 4/n
So now that we are past the NPV today question, the buyback value creation question comes into play
Let's look at if you buyback at a 25% FCF yield in FY23...well FCF/sh is A$4 so let's say we have a 20% NPAT div and rest of FCF goes to buybacks (case 2)
5/n
Assuming a constant multiple (25% spot FCF yield) we need to see $297/t NEWC average in FY24 for the share price to stay at ~A$16...that's a bold one
Minor detail though, and very important with buyback value creation...we are not at 25% right now...we are at...43% yield
6/n
Guess what NEWC price the koala needs in FY24 to hold the same FCF/sh & share price at 43% FCF yield...$260/t...that's almost $30/t on NEWC
That was a big deal in coal price before things got weird at this party!
Except, multiples SHOULD re-rate as we move towards LT price 7/n
So the q of the buyback becomes what is your LT coal price and the right FCF yield (or put another what is your discount rate for owning a high quality thermal coal stock)
It's a circular debate we could have until Net Zero actually happens for the koala's grandchildren 8/n
At least where the koala has settled out, think the buyback is accretive and the right number for this company is somewhere between A$15-20/sh and will explain it this way...
9/n
No one is investing in thermal coal
Do not think this spike is either the last one or imminently over (see all decks above assume no spike at all in the future)
So Vickery has some optionality value
Esp since LT NEWC prob $150+ 10/n
But as someone else pointed out, this is a personal journey for everyone in the market
The dream would be WHC can buyback 50% of the company this FY and next, coal is still over $200/t and the world wakes up and goes "oh fuck" 11/n
So for fun let's look at that 43% FCF yield situation
Instead of 25% FCF yield bb price & then in FY25 NEWC avg "only" $200 but mkt decides WHC finally merits a 25% FCF yield
A$16.50 sh px & A$1.80 divs, there is some value uplift v 100% FCF div payout even before taxes
12/n
But the buyback is really a call on two things:
NEWC will be higher for longer with 2020s avg price being much higher than most expect (koala agrees)
At some point the market recognizes high quality thermal has a longer runway and re-rates the sector even a little 13/n
Which the koala also agrees on
If you agree with both of those, you want the buyback done aggressively up to say a 20-25% FCF yield level
Fwiw, if NEWC avg $150/t in FY24, need a 15% FCF yield for WHC to be ~A$9.30
14/n
Having fun noodling away here with the eucalyptus tea on the buyback circularity and various scenarios but we can distill this to one thing:
Think WHC should be A$15-20/sh and company should be buying back stock in size below those levels
15/n
And the simple math there is using a brutal 15% discount rate (for an UNLEVERED company) the koala gets A$12-15/sh of intrinsic value with no value assigned to Vickery or Winchester South
Drop discount rate lower and things would get really wild...16/n
Think it's important for us to disaggregate two dicussions we tend to co-mingle.
What is the value of the stock TODAY?
What is the capital allocation framework and will that CREATE or DESTROY incremental value?
17/n
Anyways, this is not the koala's best or most concise thread, even the marsupial gets stuck in the circular fun of buyback value creation / destruction
Hope you've enjoyed it
One last thought 18/n
If you think Whitehaven should NOT be buying back stock here and just harvesting cash hard (and leave franking credits out this, ~1/2 register offshore), then you think coal is about to crater and this is the best it'll ever be, a question: why do you even own the stock?
19/19
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Decided to wait until it was Friday after the close to send this from the eucalyptus tree. Let's have a weekend to digest this. Will not be linking to the thread in question, but let's talk DBG CN, the koala's favorite punching bag & let's talk the scandium flouride mkt 1/n
First, DBG is out with news saying they've recovered 89% of the scandium in tailings into "solution". Got to love a phase 1 metallurgy when recovery really only matters when after all steps you have a marketable/payable product. Stock up >50% this week on the news 2/n
So, we have no true idea what the final recoveries are to a payable product. But the koala guesses that's what you do when whomever your new Daddy is who you talked into the summer private placement has a lock up restriction about to end...3/n
The one key pushback to the koala's longer term observation which is TOTALLY VALID is "dude, look at CCJ EV/EBITDA & P/NAV, buybacks don't make sense, neither to dividends. If you got a growth multiple, use it or lose it."
So Tim & the Professor are using it
2/n
A few outstanding questions/observations:
Brookfield Renewables appears to have put this into a fund. Is that permanent capital or in 10 years do we have a sale process?
If the latter, Cameco probably going to 100% or selling this in 2033
3/n
Ahead of this tonight, the koala wants to share two images. First is the simple "back of the eucalyptus leaf" WHC $WHC.AX model for FY23 & then for fun... 1/n
Using those same parameters, extrapolate out FY24-27 with the established capital alloc policy (20% NPAT in divvy, rest in buyback up to 50%, and koala has allocated last 50% to buyback as well) & pretended stock didn't move, what's implied NEWC to get same FCF yield each yr 2/n
Obviously this second analysis is super iterative as the buyback price assumption drives a lot of it, but figured would be fun to toy around with. There is a massive capital allocation debate around WHC...the Aussies want divvy's, the offshore prefer buybacks, but...3/n
Two parcels of land the government kept while giving everything else to CP as incentive to build the railroad...and that the Canadian federal govt still hold today...Parcel 73 and 82 right in the heart of the Elk Valley 2/n
Parcel 73 could do ~5-6MM t clean coal, 82 more like 7-8MM t BUT 82 crosses into a watershed that flows into the USA. Given selenium concerns and all that, 82 is probably sterilized for all intents and purposes so lets talk 73! 3/n
Okay, wrote it, deleted it, but let's do this in brief
99.5% of scandium reports to flotation tails according to Doubleview & the scandium is in clinopyroxene and amphiboles
Go look at how you get scandium out of those minerals 1/n
You are talking about slag, about pyrometallurgical processes. This is an entirely different flowsheet from the one that gets you a copper concentrate out of a porphyry
There is plenty of literature out there
They still don't know how to recover saleable scandium 2/n
Go understand for yourself what you are being told. This is not HPAL like at Coral Bay (or the proposed Australian laterites, whether primary scandium or Ni-Co-Sc multi-product).
3/n