🇷🇺 routinely uses violence against civilian populations to achieve political goals. While 🇷🇺 actions certainly exceed what we might imagine to be "sponsoring," #SST designation triggers important legal ramifications specifically for states engaging *directly* in terrorism. 2/10
Heard that designating 🇷🇺 a #StateSponsorOfTerrorism won't do anything new? It is common for countries under consideration for SST designation to already be sanctioned in other ways - in this case, the designation would trigger critical new restrictions and sanctions... 3/10
Designating 🇷🇺 a #StateSponsorOfTerrorism would allow Russia to be held accountable for terrorist acts in U.S. courts by eligible victims and get us in the direction of seizing Russian frozen assets for 🇺🇦.
It'd also sanction 🇷🇺 gov't actors enabling the war against 🇺🇦. 4/10
Would designating 🇷🇺 a #StateSponsorOfTerrorism prevent us from engaging in diplomacy with Putin's regime?
No. Besides the designation being a diplomatic tool itself, 🇺🇸 admins have engaged in effective diplomacy like meeting #SST heads of state and releasing 🇺🇸 prisoners. 5/10
But designating 🇷🇺 might trigger a negative reaction from Putin, no? Well, we hope he doesn't celebrate U.S. policy decisions... but, in reality, Putin's crimes aren't motivated by U.S. policy decisions.
He will commit acts of terrorism and genocide simply because he can. 6/10
Congress authorized @SecBlinken to maintain a list of State Sponsors of Terrorism, but that doesn't impact Congress' ability to designate through legislation (@tedlieu's and @LindseyGrahamSC's bills⬇️). 7/10
PACE adopted a resolution declaring 🇷🇺 a terrorist state - 99 yeas, 1 abstention. The resolve of our allies is there. 9/10
Would designating 🇷🇺 a #StateSponsorOfTerrorism be too broad, strict, or incompatible of a foreign policy tool? Not at all - #SST designation is highly modular and modifiable.
Waivers and exemptions that serve 🇺🇸 or humanitarian interest can be, and have been, created. 10/10
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Razom for Ukraine is proud to endorse the Stand With Ukraine Act. If passed by Congress, this significant bipartisan legislation would create a meaningful 10-year security partnership & deliver for the majority of Americans who want to help Ukraine win.
Read on to learn more 🧵
The Stand With Ukraine Act would codify the U.S.-Ukraine Bilateral Security Agreement—a historic 10-year roadmap for security cooperation signed by @POTUS & @ZelenskyyUa in June—into law, giving Congress a key role to ensure Ukraine wins and strong oversight of aid continues.
This legislation is also bipartisan, reflecting the overwhelming majority of Americans who want to help Ukraine win.
The Senate version is led by @SenBlumenthal & @LindseyGrahamSC, while the House version is led by @RepBrianFitz and the @UkraineCaucus.
NEW 🚀 Today, @rustem_umerov meets with @SecDef to ask the U.S. to finally permit Ukraine to defend itself by striking Russian military sites.
@razomforukraine is launching so that Americans can urge @POTUS to #LetUkraineStrikeBack and defend itself.LetUkraineStrikeBack.com
Ukrainians are grateful to the U.S. for providing weapons in recent months, especially long-range missiles known as ATACMS. But the Biden Administration has arbitrarily restricted Ukraine from using these tools to batter Putin's war machine inside Russian territory.
According to @TheStudyofWar, there are 225+ key military targets in range of ATACMS that are safe only because of @WhiteHouse policy.
When this policy changes, it can produce an immediate impact and force Russia to pull defenses back from the front.
Today, the Ukrainian parliament took a decisive step to restrict domestic threats against peace, democracy, and tolerance. Under a new law, religious groups that—through due process—are proven to collaborate with Russian authorities must cease operations in the country.
Ukraine is among the most pluralist societies in Europe. In addition to a strong church-going Orthodox Christian population, thousands of Catholic, Protestant, Muslim, and Jewish congregations operate openly in Ukraine. The same cannot be said of Russia.
There are essentially no independent religious groups remaining in Russian-occupied parts of Ukraine. Russian forces have beaten, arrested, tortured, and even murdered Ukrainian clerics, as documented by our friends @UkraineFreedom7
Haas says Ukraine will never liberate its territory from Russian occupation: "Not gonna happen!"
In reality, Ukraine has liberated over 50% of the territory captured by Russia. Just yesterday, Ukraine forced Russia's last patrol ship to abandon Crimea. kyivindependent.com/last-russian-p…
If Ukraine surrenders territory and people to Russia, "I think then Putin will essentially be potentially willing to compromise," says Haas.
World leaders roundly mock this as naive. Even @MedvedevRussiaE pledged to use a ceasefire to conquer the "remaining Ukrainian lands."
Razom for Ukraine is proud to join Americans around the country to commemorate #Juneteenth. This Juneteenth, we remember the friendship between Ira Aldridge, an African American free man and Ukraine’s poet laureate Taras Shevchenko, born a serf. 🧵
Aldridge was born in NYC and dreamed of becoming a Shakespearean actor. He moved to the UK, where his casting in Othello was met with racist derision. But he was not the type to quit. He embarked on a tour of Europe and his performances started drawing crowds and awards.
In St. Petersburg, Aldridge was introduced to Taras Shevchenko, poet, writer, artist, and folklorist who would go on to be renowned as a father-figure of modern Ukrainian literature. The men bonded instantly over their shared legacy of suffering and discrimination.
The REPO Act would use frozen Russian state assets to help Ukraine. It's only right to #MakePutinPay. But some members of Congress, such as Sen. @JDVance1, are instead trying to convince their colleagues protect Putin's billions.
Here are the facts on REPO 🧵
Claim: This would set a dangerous precedent.
Reality: This would set a precedent that countries grievously violating international law, waging genocidal wars, and trying to conquer their neighbors, will face meaningful consequences. This deters future aggression.
Claim: There is no precedent for transferring frozen state assets.
Reality: False. When Iraq invaded Kuwait in 1990, the US and allies used "countermeasures" to suspend Iraq's sovereign immunity and transfer frozen Iraqi state funds to an international compensation mechanism.