Shashank Joshi Profile picture
Nov 3 15 tweets 3 min read
🧵 Western official, with an update on the war on November 3rd. Quite a few useful insights on Russia's withdrawal of command elements from Kherson right bank, possibility of "operational level" developments in Svatove in east, and playing down of nuclear risk & Belarus front.
Western official: "We're seeing a force gradually growing with the arrival of mobilised reservists—but a low quality one likely little suited to complex offensive operations. Above all, the Russians are critically short of munitions."
Western official on Russian munitions: "somewhere between what they had at start of conflict and what they need to keep for [a] potential NATO conflict ... is trade space. And...they have eaten dangerously into that, to a point where they cannot use them casually"
Western official: "they have lots of things in storage. The problem with that is ... it has to be fit for purpose. Many of those munitions coming out of storage wouldn't be passed for use in a Western military environment; they would fail the standards tests."
Western official expresses confidence that Russian planning to withdraw from Kherson is "well advanced. A large portion of the civilian population has now moved east and Russia has highly likely prioritised a temporary bolstering of force in the area to cover the retreat."
Western official: "it's likely that most echelons of command have now withdrawn across the river, leaving demoralised and leaderless men to face Ukrainian assaults." Calls it "terrible leadership". Adds that Russian defensive lines on Dnieper right bank being built up.
Western official: "the [Kherson] retreat is going to be presented as an evacuation. So it won't be presented as a military retreat in that sense. When it does go ahead, we expect another uptick in pointed domestic criticism of Russia's national leadership."
Western official: "Rates of losses of sudden types of Russian helicopters remain extremely high. They are using an increasingly desperate collection of ageing long range munitions to strike targets at depth...at least some reservists are arriving in a theatre without weapons."
Western official on Luhansk front. In Donbas, "we've seen a reduction in fighting but we haven't seen a cessation in fighting". Singles out importance of Svatove: "The developments in Svatove sector have the potential to soon assume operational level of significance." Image
Western official on Russia's long-standing attack in the Bakhmut direction. Says Russians pushed back a week ago; "it's in statelmate at the moment...it's kind of totemic for them they don't want to give up. And in particular I think for Wagner group, they feel it's important."
Official: "support for the war...remains fairly consistent in the Russian leadership group & debate is over the means...we do not see at this stage that debates within the top of the Russian system over the conduct of the war, reflect any serious threats to Putin's position"
Western official: "in terms of nuclear activity, I've seen nothing which gives me cause for concern. In fact, [Russian] MFA has made another statement about the conditions under which nuclear weapons would be used, which ... downplay the risks of them being used"
A different Western official: "what we see in their [Russian] public statements is apparently an attempt to de-escalate the nuclear rhetoric which they have previously generated. And that is something which we thoroughly support". Ref. to this statement:
Western official on risk of attack by/from Belarus: "I'm not currently worried about...Belarus. The Russian forces which are deployed in Belarus appear to be deployed in the centre of the country away from the borders and, in our judgement, are there to fix Ukrainian forces"
Western official on morale: "we see pockets of desperate morale issues, both command level and from the troops themselves. What is difficult to say, as you piece it all together is, is how how endemic that is to the whole Russian community." Adds: no sign of mutiny.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Shashank Joshi

Shashank Joshi Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @shashj

Nov 3
.@edwardstrngr: "there is already anecdotal evidence that the Service are cherry-picking [Ukraine] ‘lessons’ out of context to support pre-conceived positions or cherished extant equipment programmes...an independent panel should be convened..." policyexchange.org.uk/wp-content/upl… Image
"There is no single [UK] official, in uniform or civilian, or military Head Quarters responsible for fighting and winning the next war ... A good example is provided by weapons stockpile planning." policyexchange.org.uk/wp-content/upl…
Finland £7bn budget buys "285k well trained reservists at immediate readiness [&] biggest artillery force in W. Europe". UK £44bn "doesn’t appear to buy very much & ingredients don’t fuse within any actionable plans. They are a generic military solution in search of a problem" Image
Read 5 tweets
Nov 3
Striking how enduring these lessons are. Drawn by William DePuy after the Yom Kippur war, but arguably you could draw them from many of the subsequent conflicts, including Ukraine—especially the point about training, skill & combined arms. usmcu.edu/Outreach/Marin… Image
"the real value of a drone is not that it can do some things better than a manned aircraft—it is that it can do things that, without a drone, could not be done at all, because there is no aerial alternative." usmcu.edu/Outreach/Marin…
"the cutting edge of drone and counterdrone technology has not been seen in Ukraine: neither drone swarms nor sophisticated antidrone equipment have been deployed, though some electronic warfare equipment being used may also have antidrone use" usmcu.edu/Outreach/Marin…
Read 6 tweets
Nov 3
Marcus Willett, GCHQ's first 'director cyber': "the Russian cyber tactics also clearly indicate that at the war’s outset the Russians lacked the cyber capabilities needed to surgically disable Ukrainian weapons systems and military units" iiss.org/blogs/survival…
Think this says something interesting about the expectations of a seasoned offensive cyber professional, in terms of what he thought should've been possible.
Marcus Willett: "Arguably the biggest factor in Russia’s cyber failure, however, has been Ukraine’s own cyber-security expertise...It is likely that the Ukrainians taught the US and the UK more about Russian cyber tactics than they learned from them" iiss.org/blogs/survival…
Read 8 tweets
Nov 2
I note that @RidT’s seminal article, Cyber War Will Not Taken Place, is now over a decade old: “All politically motivated cyber attacks are merely sophisticated versions of three activities … as old as warfare itself: sabotage, espionage & subversion”
tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.108…
Thought of it while reading piece below. It defines offensive cyber operations as those which “deceive, degrade, disrupt, deny, destroy, or manipulate” enemy systems. In many ways, this is much broader than “sabotage, espionage & subversion”. But it’s also wider than info ops.
Professionals often chafe at term “cyber war”, not just for Rid’s reasons (cyber is rarely “potentially lethal”) but also because “war” seems to exclude the non-violent effects—esp. cognitive ones—that occur through cyber. I think this can sometimes be a little pedantic. But …
Read 4 tweets
Nov 2
Indicators & warnings. “Senior Russian military leaders recently had conversations to discuss when and how Moscow might use a tactical nuclear weapon in Ukraine … according to multiple senior American officials.” nytimes.com/2022/11/02/us/…
“President…Putin was not a part of the conversations, which were held against the backdrop of Russia’s intensifying nuclear rhetoric and battlefield setbacks. But the fact that senior Russian military leaders were even having the discussions alarmed the Biden administration”
“The intelligence about the conversations was circulated inside the U.S. government in mid-October. U.S. officials would not describe the scenarios the military leaders considered for use of a nuclear weapon” nytimes.com/2022/11/02/us/…
Read 12 tweets
Nov 1
🧵 Sky News has an interview with Boris Johnson on Ukraine out today. It's a very interesting discussion. Despite being asked repeatedly, he keeps a laser-like focus on Ukraine rather than his own political implosion & ambitions. A few highlights from the interview below:
To start with, Boris somewhat throws UK Defence Intelligence under the bus. Russian victory "in a week or so...was certainly the advice that we were getting," he says. "And some of the defence intelligence people were saying, look this is going to be very, very one-sided." Image
Boris Johnson to Sky: "I think it’s absolutely inevitable that the Ukrainians will eventually win. I tell you why because this is a war of independence and wars of independence only really end one way ... we just have to show strategic patience"
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(