The newly forged myth of Ukrainians as blonde and blue-eyed betrays a profound misconception of what Ukraine is, how Ukrainians view themselves, and how they historically have been viewed in the Tsarist and Soviet Empires. A 🧵 debunking the fundamentally wrong idea. 1/
From the early 19th century, all descriptions of Ukrainians portrayed them as sharing a particular set of facial features. Romantic Ukrainian literature, travel accounts, ethnographic works, and art contributed to the image of Ukrainians as dark-haired and brown-eyed. 2/
For Ukrainian activists, this ideal of beauty was a way to carve out a specific place for the Ukrainian nationality by stressing the distinctiveness of the Ukrainian body. The famous popular song “Black eyebrows, brown eyes” gives a sense of how common this stereotype was. 3/
This image settled in the Russian cultural imagination of the tsarist era. Here is a porcelain figurine of a Ukrainian woman from the series “The people of Russia,” commissioned by Nicholas II to portray ethnographic types living under the Russian crown. 4/
This is an allegory of the "tripartite Russian nation," with a dark-haired woman representing Ukraine. 5/
In the burgeoning field of physical anthropology of the early 20th century, Ukrainian scholars championed the idea of Ukrainian distinctiveness based on the color of eyes and hair. In his work “Anthropological peculiarities of the Ukrainian people” (1916)... 6/
...one of the most famous tsarist anthropologists, Khvedir Vovk/Fedor Volkov, asserted that “Ukrainians are quite a homogenous people, dark-haired and brown-eyed.” 7/
Even thous this argument intended to draw the line of distinction between Ukrainians and Russians in terms of their appearance, some Russian opponents of Vovk did not object — only to present Ukrainians as racially inferior. 8/
The Russian nationalist (himself of Ukrainian origin) Andrei Storozhenko evoked the concept of race in his work “The Ukrainian Movement” (which influenced Putin’s idea of Ukraine) to claim that “nationally minded” Ukrainians were "racially inferior" to the “Russian race.” 9/
The reason was the racial mixing of Ukrainians with steppe nomads, which made them “dark-skinned and dark-haired.” According to him, people of “inferior races” spoiled “mental qualities” of Ukrainians, which is why they were characterised by “dullness and narrowness of mind.” 10/
With the rise of Aryanism and its ideal of the Nordic race in interwar Europe, right-wing Ukrainian thinkers acknowledged that Ukrainians would hardly qualify as the bearers of "superior traits." The pioneer of Ukrainian ethno-nationalism Dmytro Dontsov... 11/
...who, under the influence of eugenic ideas, believed in the primacy of the Nordic race, nevertheless regretted that, “unfortunately,” blue eyes and blond hair were “the least presented” among Ukrainians. 12/
The Soviet visual propaganda widely reproduced this image. Posters touting the myth of the friendship of nations usually depicted Ukrainians as dark-haired and brown-eyed, in contrast to blue-eyed and blonde Russians. 13/
A male figure symbolizing Russia was normally portrayed as a man wearing a suit, a bearer of modernity and civilization, who led representatives of other nations, dressed in folk costumes (as if they were unfit for the modern world), to the bright communist future. 14/
Unlike Ukrainians, Russians were normally depicted in the Soviet propaganda as blue-eyed blondes. If East Slaves were ever portrayed as the bearers of "Nordic" features, it was the Russian, not Ukrainian, perception of themselves. 15/
How do “ethnic” Ukrainians *really* like? The chief Ukrainian ethnologist Serhii Seheda says that up to 70% of them are brown-eyed and dark-haired, the others have brown hair and dark eyes, while a small percentage have light eyes. Take it with a grain of salt. 16/
Ethnicity is an elusive category, which is impossible to measure and define, but the stereotype of blonde and blue-eyed Ukrainians doesn't make any sense. It's a way of making claims on behalf of Ukrainians, ascribing to them an “ideal” they never upheld themselves. end/
“*really* look like”
Gosh, “East Slavs.” @elonmusk, give us the edit button!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I wonder how the carefully cultivated image of Russia as the leader of the Global South's anti-colonial struggle against the West correlates with the fact that the popular anti-US imagery that swept over Russia in 2013-15 was profoundly racist? 1/
Unlike the Soviet visual propaganda, which featured an image of a fat man with a top hat and a sack of gold, pro-Kremlin anti-US visuals focused mostly on one feature — Barak Obama’s skin color. 2/
In 2013, Irina Rodnina, an MP from the United Russia party, tweeted a racist picture of Barak and Michelle Obama looking at a banana. Even though she deleted the twit after an international scandal, the image of Obama with a banana became widespread. 3/
At the heart of Africa's image of Russia as an anti-colonial power lies a myth about the vital help it provided to Ethiopia at the Battle of Adwa in 1896. This myth, personified by the figure of Nikolai Leont'ev, conceals a grim history of tsarist colonial pursuits in Ethiopia.🧵
Each year on the Adwa Victory Day, the Russian Embassy in Ethiopia underscores Russia's contribution to the victory by posting fake photos. Here, it claims to be showing a photo of "Russian volunteer soldiers," which in fact portrays Italian colonial forces in Eritrea in 1889. 2/
Here, a photo of actual Russian colonizers — Ashinov and his "Cossacks" — in the ill-fated Russian colony in Djibouti is used in the same way. Ironically, it was Leont'ev who nearly succeeded where Ashinov failed, having become a "ruler" of an African realm. 3/
This morning, Russian missiles hit my hometown, which is many hundreds of km from the frontline. Smoke was all over the sky. The entire city was left without electricity and water. There are some important reasons of why this is happening. 1/
Apart from Russia's effort to unleash terror all over Ukraine, destroying the livelihoods of millions of people and leaving them with no heating, water and power supply with the arrival of winter cold, and apart from genocidal considerations ("Ukrainians should not exist")... 2/
...there is also an issue, much-discussed in revanchist groups, of whether a former imperial possession that is breaking away with an empire is allowed to keep the "gifts of civilization" that the empire had given it during their time "together." According to this view... 3/
All comforting stories about how Russians did not colonize Africa stop short of telling that they actually shed their blood trying. This is a long 🧵 about how French bombs on the Red Sea coast smashed the tsarist colonial dream of Africa to pieces. 1/
In January 1889, a solemn flag-raising ceremony was held in Djibouti. A flag of three horizontal bands – red, blue, and white – was raised over the fort of Sagallo, symbolizing the African territory’s annexation “for eternity” by its new colonial overlord, the Russian Empire. 2/
How was it even possible? Russia did not negotiate any colony at the Berlin Conference of 1884–85, where European powers divided the continent. However, even before the conference closed its doors, its organizer, Bismarck, invited the Russian Empire to join in the scramble. 3/
In the speech where Putin called the collapse of USSR "a major geopolitical disaster," he also said that "the civilizing mission of the Russian nation" in Eurasia must continue." V. Vereshchagin captured the encounter of #Samarkand with Russia's mission civilisatrice this way: 1/
The painting was part of the series "The Barbarians," which represented the "backward" nature of the Orient that civilization, carried on the backs of the Russian troops, was meant to salvage. "Civilizing mission" was a key term of the 19-c. vocabulary of colonialism. 2/
It was widely used as a justification of colonial presence across the globe. Even though it implied that empire was here to uplift the "indigenous" population, it also created a fundamental divide between the colonizer and the colonized. 3/
This image of a European governor of a sub-Saharan province evokes everything we associate with colonialism. Indeed, he and many of his "white" compatriots came to Africa for the benefit of empire.
But there's a nuance: the Tsarist Empire.
🧵on Russia and whiteness in Africa. 1/
We've met this guy already. Nikolai Leont'ev, a landowner from Kherson, an adventurer, a colonial, a man who was behind Ethiopia's diplomatic mission to St. Petersburg. A man who promised Menelik arms and ammo in exchange for a colony for Russia somewhere in Djibouti. 2/
A man who became the head of a newly annexed province in Ethiopia's south. A man who, after all, promised his "rights" to this land to the tsar. As befitted a colonial man of privilege, he was an avid big-game hunter. Elephants were his passion. Just like any other animals. 3/