At its core- the story theme is the same as Mahabharatha, Baahubali & Game of thrones, if you will.
One king is retiring. Who is going to become the next king?
The fight is for the Chola throne. The period is 968 AD according to Kalki.
Also, according to history!
A quick history lesson:
Parantaka-1 has 3 sons - the elder son died early in a war.
The middle son Gandaraditya became the next king. His son Madhurantaka was 1 year old when he dies.
So, Gandaraditya asks his younger brother Arinjaya to succeed him.
Fate played a game here!
Arinjaya died in a year after becoming king.
We have 2 choices for the next king here:
1. The 3rd brother and current king's son - Sundara Chola of age 20 (played by Prakshraj)
2. The 2nd brother and ex-king's son - Madhurantaka, of age 2 (played by Rahman)
They went with #1
24 years later, after Sundara Chola, who should become king?
1. Madhurantaka, age 26 2. Sundara Chola's 1st son Aditya Karikala (played by Vikram), age 25
Should the son of the older brother, or the grandson of the younger, be crowned?
A conflict as old as the Mahabharatha!
After multiple conspiracies, betrayals, battles, natural disasters,
The answer to this question is provided at the end of the book-5. (Part-2 movie!)
You are in for a delightful treat of a journey! A tale for the ages!
What does the strategist and writer Cho have to say about the recent Ramayana dating controversy?
Although Cho isn't alive today, he has shared his opinion on this topic in the preface to his immortal work 'Hindu Maha Samudhram'.
And he does take a clear side. A thread (1/8)
Cho starts his 6 volume compendium of Hindu Maha Samudhram with the traditional mantra for Sankalpa, & proceeds to explain the math behind Brahma's 1 day equaling 4.32 lakh human years.
He contrasts the western date 14/1/2005 with the Sankalpa date as per Sveta Varaha Kalpa.
He says that this traditional dating of lakhs of years may seem untenable to the civilized mind which limits all of recorded human history based on Greek and Chinese civilizations to 3000 BCE.
Is this 3000 BCE dating free of errors - Cho asks.
And he answers it quite clearly.
Did Rama live in Treta Yuga lakhs of years ago, or in 5114 BCE?
Is there an element of truth in the astro-logical/nomical analysis that date Ramayana to our history?
Is there merit to this intellectual exercise of chronologizing an Itihasa or is it pointless?
A thread (1/8)
Every book must first know its audience and their intellectual context.
There's an Indic mind that's capable of visualizing one Brahma's day as 4.32 billion human years.
There's also a western educated skeptic mind that relies on scientific method to comprehend the world.
And we have both these minds.
Our cultural context helps us with the Indic mode of thinking, and Macaulay education mode trains us to byheart "21 Apr 1526" as the date for Battle of Panipat in exam.
History thus becomes 'If there is a date to it, it must really have happened'
Might be hard to believe today, but once upon a time, in 1971, Tamilnadu was one of the two states within the country, to have total prohibition of alcohol in force. Along with Gujarat.
This is the story of who implemented Prohibition in TN and who lifted it, and why : (1/8)
Again, it might be hard to believe today, but TN was once the bastion of Congress.
In the 1st Madras legislative assembly election in 1937, Congress won 159/215 seats - its most impressive electoral performance across all provinces.
Led by Satyamurthy and Kamaraj initially.
But Rajaji evinced interest at the last minute and took over the leadership.
He perhaps thought of this as a godsent opportunity to implement his ideas on prohibition in Madras Presidency.
Despite winning the elections, Congress was reluctant to form the government. Why?
According to sources, Film Companion is shutting down, as Anupama Chopra is moving on to Hollywood Reporter.
For those who don't know, what TNM is for "journalism", FC is for film reviews.
You couldn't find a more w0ke, biased film site even if you tried. A 🧵of their reviews:
FC Review#1:
The Kerala Story is not even a film since it is all propaganda based on "Whatsapp Forwards"
The film featured interviews of real victims of radicalization, grooming and LJ, and who were jailed in Afghanistan.
FC Review #2:
The Kashmir Files is a dishonest dive into the past that is a living room debate parading as a movie.
Yeah right, Kashmiri Pandits wanted to mass emigrate simply because Kashmir was too beautiful and
their pains aren't real unless a w0ke reviewer sitting in his air conditioned room at Worli acknowledges it.
Today is Thirunaaraiyoor Nambiyaandar Nambi's guru poojai (Vaikasi Punarapoosam).
The story of how Nambi was asked by Rajaraja to discover and compile the Shaivite Thirumurais is fascinating.
A thread on this miraculous Sthala Puranam (1/9):
Thirunaaraiyoor, a small village 20 km Southwest to Chidambaram houses a Paadal Petra Sthalam, Soundareswarar Temple.
In this temple, the son is more famous than his father – and goes by the name Pollaa Pillayaar.
It is not பொல்லாப் பிள்ளையார் as is commonly misspelt, but பொள்ளாப் பிள்ளையார் meaning “unsculpted”. This is because this Pillayar murthy here is believed to be a swayambhu murthy.
This temple’s priest from an Adishaivite family was blessed with a son and he was named Nambiyaandar Nambi.
The young Nambi grew to be devout and accompanied his father for his temple duties. One day, Nambi’s father had to go to a neighboring village and delegated the temple duties to Nambi.
How on earth did the educated, civilized and God fearing people of Tamilnadu allow this malicious, unfair harassment of TBs to continue for a century now?
Nobody desires evil Thanos, yet this vicious harassment has not gone away for generations, so what gives?
A thread (1/9)
Because this targetted harassment has an utility, it has a benefit for the society at large.
For as long as this one community remains the punching bag, the spotlight is taken away from all other communities and they are shielded.
This explains why mostly only TBs suffer from "ancestral guilt", and why most w0kes from TN are TBs who overcompensate.
Nobody else is made to feel guilt or shame the way the TBs are subjected to, and this is the real win of D narrative: it consolidates the other 97%, psychologically.