If you were worried that we needed much lower wage growth to make up for declining productivity, yesterday's report suggests that the decline earlier this year wasn't a sustained trend; probably a temporary effect of high churn 2/
Here's the picture. My guess is that we'll soon see productivity growth, though not necessarily level, return to historical norms 3/
Given what's happening to wages and productivity, I don't see any way to make the case, as some have, for underlying inflation of 6 or even 7 percent. This looks <4, possibly even as low as 3 4/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
My guess is that hardly any voters know that Republicans will almost surely try to make major cuts to Medicare and Social Security if they prevail 1/ nytimes.com/2022/11/02/us/…
So we've returned to full employment, but with unacceptably high inflation. And inflation is bad because it reduces real wages — right? Actually, the facts if you compare the current situation with pre pandemic, are kind of surprising 1/
Two wage measures: overall and nonsupervisory (regular people). Two price measures: overall and excluding food and energy, which are not much affected by policy. 2/
How to think about the GDP advance release: it make claims that we were in a recession in the 1st half of the year look silly, but it suggests, at least to me, that there's a lot of contraction still in the pipeline 1/
Since the beginning of this year, we've seen soaring mortgage rates and a soaring dollar, both largely reflecting Fed tightening. Both should exert strong contractionary effects over time 2/
It's useful to compare the latest numbers with 2021Q4, before the tightening began. Real residential investment is down 12.5%, not trivial but still fairly small given the surge in mortgage rates and the collapse in mortgage applications 3/ mortgagenewsdaily.com/data/mortgage-…
Want to preregister a take on tomorrow's GDP advance release: if residential investment hasn't fallen much, that's a sign that Fed policy is too tight, not too loose. Why? Because it means that large negative effects of rate hikes are still in the pipeline 1/
Mortgage applications are down 70%, so a large housing slump is already baked in. If it hasn't shown up yet, just wait 2/
A substantial decline in core inflation is also baked in, because market rents — reflected in shelter CPI with a long lag — are rolling over. So if this report suggests that the depressing effects of Fed hikes are still mostly ahead, good case for a pivot 3/
A crushingly obvious point that doesn't get made enough: Republicans are running on inflation, but have no plan — none at all — to bring it down 1/ nytimes.com/2022/10/26/us/…
R candidates constantly point to the low price of gasoline in January 2021. But that low price reflected a world economy — not just the US — still depressed by the effects of the pandemic 2/
If you ask what Rs are proposing now, it's basically Trussonomics — large unfunded tax cuts sold on the completely unfounded claim that they'll boost economic growth. And they're also threatening to cause a financial crisis over the debt limit 3/