What does a brutal regime do when, try as they might, their own security forces just can’t do all the torture and killing on their own?

Well, in #Myanmar, the junta outsources some of it to others...
🧵 Image
Since the military coup on February 1, 2021, Myanmar’s junta has brutally suppressed opposition.

Police and military have killed at least 2,300 people, and arbitrarily detained more than 15,700, using torture on many in detention.
aappb.org
It all amounts to crimes against humanity.
hrw.org/news/2021/07/3…
But the torturers and murderers are not all wearing uniforms of the official security services.

Some are in pro-junta militias that emerged shortly after the coup.
The Phyu Saw Htee, a network of intelligence units and military supporters that have received training and weapons from the military, reinforce the military’s security apparatus and have carried out countless attacks on political activists and others.
What’s more, in April, the military announced it would form public militias made up of former military personnel, pro-military civilians, soldiers, and police to combat resistance to the junta.
The Thway Thout Ah-Pwe, or “Blood Comrades” militia, formed soon after and launched “Operation Red,” targeting members of the ousted National League for Democracy (NLD) party and anti-junta groups.
This militia – in fact, a death squad – is particularly twisted, publicly boasting of their crimes.

They mark their victims by placing lanyards with the group’s logo over their the bodies and then share the graphic photos on social media.
Within a week of forming, they openly claimed to have tortured and killed at least eight NLD members. Since then, they’ve killed dozens.
Of course, none of these groups have faced any consequences for their actions.

They are literally getting away with murder.
If there’s to be any hope of accountability for these crimes by the junta and junta-backed militias, there needs to be strong pressure from outside.
The UK recently drafted a UN Security Council resolution calling for a global arms embargo on Myanmar. That’s one step.

Referring Myanmar to the International Criminal Court is another.
📢 "Outsourcing Atrocities in Myanmar" was the top story in my newsletter today.

📲 READ the whole edition online and SUBSCRIBE to the email here: hrw.org/the-day-in-hum… Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Andrew Stroehlein

Andrew Stroehlein Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @astroehlein

Nov 9
Twitter confirms they will NOT verify users' identities for the new blue check.

An invitation to scammers & impersonation.

And they've said the new blue checks will have priority in the algorithm. (pay or disappear)

⚠️ The amplification of awful.

reuters.com/technology/twi…
Huge danger in disconnecting the blue check from verification.

⚠️ In some places, impersonation of human rights defenders can lead to death or worse.
Years ago, we pushed Twitter to see rights defenders on the same level - ie worthy of verification - as govt officials, politicians, journalists, etc, because the consequences of impersonation were so serious.
Read 4 tweets
Nov 9
Twitter's new "official" badge has appeared on some profiles and then disappeared again. For example, @GretaThunberg - first screenshot taken at 10:56 am ET, second at 11:25 am ET.

Wonder what's going on... ImageImage
Also @nytimes - had it, then lost it... ImageImage
Also @antonioguterres - had it, then lost it... ImageImage
Read 8 tweets
Nov 9
Twitter seems to be worried about governments talking about leaving the platform, so they'll introduce a new "official" label.

Also...

CRITICAL: Twitter has confirmed they will NOT actually verify users' identities for the new blue check.

Very grim.
reut.rs/3UkJqLa
There are a number of serious problems with where Twitter's headed - a pay-or-disappear algorithm, for example, will lock out many voices, and drive misinformation to the fore.
But what concerns me most personally perhaps is the danger of disconnecting the blue check from verification.

⚠️ In some places, impersonation of human rights defenders can lead to death or worse.
Read 7 tweets
Nov 8
I joined Facebook in 2007.

I joined Twitter in 2008.

I posted on both for a while, and then I dropped Facebook to focus on Twitter.

Now, I’ve joined Mastodon, and I’m posting on two platforms again.

Maybe in the future, I’ll post from only one again.

Things change.
I left Facebook - well, actually, I still have an account, but almost never post there - because changes to the platform meant it didn’t suit what I needed.

If Twitter makes changes that mean it doesn’t suit what I need, I’ll leave here, too.
I’m not there yet: I’m still posting here and on Mastodon, where I’m (re)building a network.

When you see that the ship you’re on might sink, it’s only sensible to prepare your lifeboat.
Read 6 tweets
Nov 6
So, after a full week on Mastodon, here are some thoughts, positive sides first...

1⃣ Joining is easy, and getting used to it is pretty straightforward for anyone who’s been on Twitter.
2⃣ Lots of others are joining right now, and I’m seeing loads of familiar faces there - activists and journalists - so it is already starting to feel like a familiar space to me.
3⃣ Engagement on Mastodon is huge compared to Twitter.

It’s logical: most people on Twitter only see what the algorithm lets them see, and most of your followers never see your tweets.
Read 10 tweets
Nov 5
Pay or disappear…

People will quickly learn that everyone with a blue check is paying to get their message in front of your eyes - that’s simply advertising.

From a “micro-blogging platform” to a “micro-advertising platform.”
Personally, I guess I have to consider whether to drop my verification both on principle - verification should be for countering impersonation - and for practical reasons: I don’t want people to think I’m an advertiser.
A blue check will turn into a negative marker, particularly for those of us here trying to cover serious issues. And then not having it will make us invisible on the platform, so no reason to stay here.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(