"..in order to assure research dollars, scientists have to keep a proper face on their efforts. They can't admit weakness, uncertainty. They have to forge ahead with their virus and their plans for a vaccine, a magic bullet that will wipe the problem off the face of the earth."
"Ask ten scientists about the chances of AIDS originating by accident in a lab. ..and ten will scoff at you. 'Why, how perfectly crude of you to suggest such a thing. How absurd. Only an uneducated non-Ph.D. without a credential to his name would suggest such tripe.'"
"Worldwide laboratory accidents and safety violations occur frequently. When a new disease pops up the Lab is one of the first places one ought to look. Scientists don't want to open the door to the possibility that they could have contributed to illness and death."
"..when scientists are confronted with their own sloppiness, botched experiments, wasted time and money—see how they refuse to admit the truth, watch how they try to lie and discredit the accusations, watch how they act like a bunch of hustlers whose shell-game has been burned."
"It is clear to anyone who has studied the matter that the medical "establishment," along with its intimate connections to the pharmaceutical industry and federal agencies such as the FDA, is opposed to any "break- through" or "cure" for serious chronic diseases."
"The AIDS virus enabled the virologists to become the new shamans of medical science. As a result, national and local policies on testing, surveillance, research, treatment, and prevention are greatly influenced by the scientific opinions of these award-winning AIDS virologists."
"Closely allied to these virologists are the high-ranking epidemiologists, who are primarily employed by the U.S. Public Health Service, or by the country's most prestigious medical institutions. Working hand-in-hand with this coterie are the pharmaceutical companies."
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
However, there's another possibility that has been hotly debated and wildly refuted around every corner. It's been branded "crank conspiracy" and discussion of this has been ridiculed. However the scientific literature still strongly suggests we need to take WCR more seriously.
🤔 Amazingly, in violation of the FDA’s EUAs signed by Dr. Marks himself, neither promotional video includes the language legally required as a condition of the EU that these products have not been approved or licensed as safe and effective..
All descriptive printed matter, advertising, and promotional material relating to the use of the [Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna] COVID-19 Vaccine clearly and conspicuously shall state, as applicable, that:
👇👇👇👇👇
"ICAN requests that you as the Director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, immediately remove these videos and explain why a Director within the FDA would violate its own EUA conditions. ICAN looks forward to your prompt response."
If COVID vaccines may not protect people with immune disorders, how can we expect them to protect an entire population who has been exposed to a novel virus which reduces CD4 T Cells and causes immune system dysfunction?
We cannot prop up one study as definitive "proof" of something that many other medical journals claim otherwise. The cardiovascular damage of COVID-19 infection absolutely can present myocarditis. In this thread I will furnish studies I've found elucidating this claim.
• SARS-CoV-2 infection has many clinical similarities as HIV/AIDS
• SARS-CoV-2 is airborne
• SARS-CoV-2 has been claimed to be a "respiratory illness" despite surmounting evidence it is a vascular and autoimmune disease.
"Both HIV-1 and SARS-CoV-2 infection share CD4+ T cell loss in..disease outcome and immunodeficiency..attacks on CD4+ T cells, immune activation and redistribution of CD4+ T cell are contributing mechanisms in both diseases."
One of the most taboo topics to discuss, I've noticed, next to the Origins of Covid debate, is probably the uncanny similarities between this novel coronavirus and HIV.
Before we proceed, an excellent thread on the genomic similarities between scov2 and HIV can be found here.
Many critics scoff at the suggestion and call it fear mongering and anti-science, some have even suggested that comparing this novel virus to HIV/AIDS is an insult to those who do suffer from those actual diseases. However, there are clinical similarities we need to consider.