As we wait for the polls to close and results to come in over the next week, we've got an #ElectionDay timeline cleanser for you, brought to you by the pets of @RewireNewsGroup🐾
Next, we have Kit, who is a Shih Tzu-Pitbull mix, our resident senior, who loves long walks and puzzles.
If you follow @Hegemommy, you're probably acquainted with Pistachio (aka "Stache"), the young Shepherd mix, and Newt, the deaf Cattle Dog mix, both invaluable members of the staff.
And if you haven't met the latest addition to @AngryBlackLady's family, this is Sammy the Chihuahua with his @CholulaHotSauce chew toy.
Then we've got the demure Spaniel-Terrier mix, JJ, @natasharoyy's family dog and a mama's boy, whose favorite human snack is @Pringles.
Not to leave out the @RewireNewsGroup cats: here's Sagan serving beans and floops.
Finally, we have Henry, who would like to remind you to sit in the sunshine when you can and soak up some Vitamin D—doctor's orders.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
@AngryBlackLady here live-tweeting the arguments in #BrackeenVHaaland, the case that demonstrates there's nothing white folks won't complain about when they don't get their way. They want native children and by George, they'll have them, ICWA be damned!
The case is more than about the white supremacist urge to steal Native children from their homes and assimilate them, thereby severing their ties to their tribes.
It's also about ending tribal sovereignty. "Native American" is a political designation that means something.
But the Brackeens and the state of Texas want "Native American" to be a racial classification so they can complain that the Indian Child Welfare Act unfairly prioritizes Native American people in the placement of Native foster children.
On Wednesday, the Supreme Court is set to hear oral arguments in a challenge to a 44-year-old law that prioritizes placing Native American children in Native American homes. The case is called Brackeen v. Haaland and the law at issue is the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA).
On this day in 1978, Congress enacted ICWA in response to abusive child welfare practices that resulted in large numbers of Native children being separated from their homes, families, and tribes.
The Brackeens and the state of Texas (where they reside) are asking the Supreme Court to overturn over 40 years of precedent authorizing Congress to pass laws like ICWA, which gives special treatment to Native Americans as a result of the long history of oppression and genocide.
On Halloween, the Supreme Court is set to hear oral arguments in two cases that will likely overrule more than 40 years of precedent regarding race-based affirmative action in higher education.
Both cases, SFFA v. Harvard University and SFFA v. University of North Carolina, were filed by Students for Fair Admissions, an anti-affirmative action organization run by conservative Edward Blum.
Remember Becky with the Bad Grades? Abigail Fisher who lost her case against University of Texas in 2016? That case was also backed by Ed Blum.
Only 1 in 6 people in states with total abortion bans support them, according to a new @ppc_umd study, which raises the question: How are these bans becoming law with no popular support?
Nearly 6 in 10 voters say the government should not make getting an abortion a crime, and even more say abortion should not be a crime before viability.
A bipartisan majority also supports:
🔡Requiring public schools to provide education about birth control
💊Continuing the Affordable Care Act mandate that most insurance plans cover long-term birth control such as the pill and IUDs
💰Subsidizing long-term birth control