Patrick Fox Profile picture
Nov 9 12 tweets 3 min read
Kherson Pocket🧵:
If this is what it looks like & RU forces are preparing to attempt a retreat over the Dnieper, then the UAF is being given a priceless opportunity. Unless they are logistically incapable, or lack sufficient force, they should crush the RuAF against the river.
1/
The ideal way forward would be to drive down from the northern end of the pocket with the aim of cutting off RU forces from the dam at Nova Kakhovka. We've already seen what appears to be retrograde movement from RU forces in this area.
2/
If that can be accomplished it removes the only reliable standing crossing left over the river within the pocket. RU forces will be forced to rely on ferries or hastily erected pontoon bridges to effect their escape. These are flimsier and present prime targets for artillery.
3/
Support fire will be critical. Avenues of approach to crossing points, roads, the crossings themselves, disembarkation points on the east bank, collection points - all of these mass large numbers of troops (targets) in small areas where artillery can be most effective.
4/
Continual fire on such targets will not only kill but demoralize retreating Russian soldiers. If the dam crossing can be secured by the UAF, this will further impress on the average Russian trooper that not all of them will make it back over the river.
5/
Spetsnaz units, VDV, and what little of the senior RU officer corps remains will be first in line for evacuation. The average Russian line soldier will be an afterthought. Once this grim reality sets in & UAF ground forces begin their own assault on whatever rearguard...
6/
...is left in the fortifications to cover this evacuation, the RuAF line units will begin to break under pressure. Unlike Kharkiv, once they break they have nowhere to run to. Their backs are to the river. This is when casualties & surrenders will begin to escalate rapidly.
7/
RuAF units that fight will be overrun & destroyed in isolation. Those with any inclination to surrender will understand their chances are far better with UAF regulars than Khersons partisans. If the dam is secured, the goal should be to drive to the river, eliminating as...
8/
...many RU personnel as possible. If Kherson can be captured while lightly defended, it should be done. If not it may need to be bypassed & surrounded until the UAF stabilizes it's lines on the river after eliminating the remainder of RuAF forces on the west bank.
9/
Afterwards, Kherson can be invested & compelled to surrender or assaulted as the case may be. This is an opportunity to inflict damage on the Russian Army with strategic implications, given their current manpower shortage. Any RU personnel who escape this trap will be...
10/
...faced by the UAF again on battlefields unlikely to be as favorable as this one is. The destruction or capture of the majority of the 20,000 RU personnel is a prize the UAF should seize with both hands if it is at all capable of doing so. Now's the time to break them.
11/11
Addition: Kherson is the largest municipality captured to date, has had significant partisan resistance, & is/was the focus of much of the RU occupation governance effort. I fully expect to see large numbers of atrocities uncovered after it is secured.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Patrick Fox

Patrick Fox Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @RealCynicalFox

Nov 1
SIGAR has 7 "key lessons" for us, lets count them down 🧵:
Correct, the US had no long term comprehensive plan for successfully prosecuting the wars in Iraq & Afghanistan then departing once its objectives had been achieved. To date, no one has been held accountable for this.
The US failed to secure the country before trying to rebuild it. Timelines & expectations were predictably thrown off by the politics, enemy action, a corrupt local government, & defense contractors concerned with securing contracts over producing results.
The US Govt developed an atrocious habit of throwing bales of money at Afghanistan with little contiguous oversight on how it was spent or the results it produced as commanders & admins rotated through. "Not sustainable" is generous bordering on falsehood.
Read 4 tweets
Oct 31
Kremlin Spokesman Peskov & FM Lavrov are now stipulating general preconditions under which a Biden-Putin conference with the implied aim of ending the war in Ukraine might occur. They center around Russian interests, security concerns, & a return to the Dec-Jan state of affairs.
Several observations on this. First, the desire to meet w/the US POTUS is a snub to Zelensky & a recognition that the collected West will be involved in the peace process given their level of support to UA's war effort.
ria.ru/20221030/dialo…
Second, it plays into the running narrative that Ukraine is a puppet of the West and any deal made exclusively with Kyiv w/o consulting Washington isn't a credible way to implement peace.
ria.ru/20221030/razgo…
Read 5 tweets
Oct 30
Short JSDF🧵:
Japanese efforts to rearm in the face of the rising threat of the PRC continue apace with this development. Joint Commands have become a hallmark of (primarily) Western militaries in coordinating combined arms operations.
1/
japantimes.co.jp/news/2022/10/2…
The creation of one within the JSDF indicates Tokyo foresees the possibility that it may need to coordinate its combat arms routinely &/or on the grand scale, where an ad hoc JC for a single operation simply will not suffice. While this may seem like a routine matter...
2/
...for other nations, it is something quite different in the Japanese context where the constitution places strict limitations on military activity. Coupled with a desire to ramp up to 2% military spending w/in the next 5 years, and various other...
3/
japantimes.co.jp/news/2022/04/2…
Read 5 tweets
Oct 29
Initial thoughts on the Sevastopol Attack 🧵:
UAF drones attacked & damaged Russian naval assets to an undetermined degree last night in Sevastopol harbor. In addition to the physical damage, this attack served several purposes. It underlines the ability of the UAF to strike
1/
deep into Crimean targets. Specifically large, expensive, and/or difficult to replace targets like warships or the aircraft destroyed in the strike on Saki airbase last month. This presents Russia with a choice; it may continue to expose these assets to this level of risk
2/
or withdraw them. Either way there are benefits. If Russia maintains these ships in the Crimean AO to support ongoing operations, it risks a repeat of the Moskva sinking & the subsequent loss of face such a propaganda victory would generate.
3/
Read 5 tweets
Oct 13
For those who still wonder how Europe could possibly find itself in its current position, allow me to offer an example.

This is what passes for statesmanship from the President of France.
Just to dig into this a little more for those who think I'm being too hard on the French President: This comes on the heels of a statement made by Pres. Macron to French 2, yesterday where he said the following:
1/
“Our (nuclear deterrence) doctrine rests on the fundamental interests of the nation...they are defined clearly and wouldn’t be directly affected at all if, for example, there was a ballistic nuclear attack in Ukraine, in the region."
2/
Read 5 tweets
Oct 4
US Foreign Policy 🧵:
Those of you who've followed me a while know I loathe delving into domestic US politics. Unfortunately this will be one of those times. I use @charliekirk11 's tweet as a case in point that speaks to a larger issue I've been seeing for some time now.
1/
@charliekirk11 There is a tendency in the US to denigrate an issue (esp. a foreign policy issue) as unworthy of US time & effort for fear your political opposition will co-opt it to their own ends & make political gains off any policy designed around the issue in question.
2/
While perhaps this makes sense when put through the zero-sum lens of the US's dual party system, it also has the unfortunate tendency to deadlock any attempt to form coherent policy. Often this is not ideal, but also not critical. Unfortunately, this time the issue is dire.
3/
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(