Thread by @SteB777

Most plans to address the ecological and climate crisis, involve serious denial. Either the figures are fiddled or there is governmental or corporate denial of responsibility, or they do not look at the full spectrum of the highly interlinked ecological/sustainability crisis.
1/

https://twitter.com/IanJSinclair/status/1590616351302770688

It's obvious why this is happening. They start off from the point off from the unquestioned position of maintaining business as usual, maintaining the status quo. Then try to find some sort of fantasy solution, consistent with this.
2/

The core problem to this is quite simple. Some individuals and some countries are vastly wealthier than other individuals and countries, and this inevitably means all other individuals and countries will try catching up with them.
3/

Whilst at the same time the richest individuals (billionaires) and the richest countries, go all out to create even more wealth, and all this is premised on the unconstrained over-exploitation of the Earth's natural resources. A viciously circular process.
4/

It is pretty bleeding obvious that such a system is not sustainable as we are already in a situation facing future catastrophe, at the current rate of wealth and over-exploitation of finite natural resources. Let alone from much bigger future demands on finite systems.
5/

There seems to be gigantic denial about this, not least of all from the top 1% of the richest people in our societies, who run everything from our governments, corporations, media, academic institutes, every major organization in society i.e. really everything.
6/

Self-evidently, none of the richest 1% have any interest at all in the only obvious solution, equity, because within such a system of equity, they would lose all their power, wealth and status. They control the dialogue, because they control everything.
7/

The huge obstacle is the superficial similarity between equity in sustainability and climate solutions, and ideologies like Marxism, socialism, communism, which also sought supposed equality. Actually, they have very different roots and premises.
8/

The ideological right has weaponised opposition to the "left", so they only have to label something "left", or some more extreme left wing label, to have their Pavlovian conditioned supporters frothing at the mouth in utter hatred, at this perceived enemy.
9/

An even deeper problem is the right, and even centre have pinned their colours of an obsession with growth to their ideological mast, and deem anyone questioning this, as the enemy the #antigrowthcoalition. This is how climate change denial has become a right wing obsession.
10/

However, this left right thing is something of a red herring, because whilst it does exist, this is really about those who have done very well out of the current system, trying to maintain the status quo, to protect their own self-interest.
11/

As I've already explained it is totally incompatible with sustainability, to have some individuals and countries vastly wealthier than other countries as by necessity, the rest will try to catch up, threatening far higher levels of consumption and over-exploitation.
12/

In fact, this competition, the mad scramble to become ever richer, which actually accelerates, the richer someone becomes, is at the very heart of how this wealth was created in the first place. It is inherent to the current system. It's all viciously circular.
13/

Self-evidently, because of this, extreme wealth inequality is inconsistent with sustainability. First, to be sustained long term, you would need some fixed social immobility, like you had in medieval times. But even that would not work for the reasons below.
14/

As the medieval period illustrates, there might not have been that much social mobility, with most being peasants, serfs etc stuck in their station in life, but those at the top still engaged in massive competition with each other to get even wealthier i.e. colonization.
15/

Therefore, any system, that involves major elements within it, trying to get even wealthier, wealth primarily accumulated by the over-exploitation of natural resources and natural systems, is inherently unsustainable.
16/

Not least of all because those seeking more wealth, need lots of people to create this wealth for them, hence massive population growth, because they have directly encouraged it. All countries pursuing growth panic if their population starts to fall.
17/

These are all fundamental truths. Okay, my framing of these truths is likely imperfect. I am humble to my limited abilities, but I know for certain, that a better objective framing of the situation, would still involve all these elements. Even if more eloquently explained.
18/

Trying to treat this as just a climate crisis is utterly dishonest and involves mass denial.

"We cannot solve the threats of human-induced climate change and loss of biodiversity in isolation. We either solve both or we solve neither."
theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
19/

My only criticism of Sir Robert Watson (former chair of the @IPCC_CH and @IPBES), is the sustainability crisis is even bigger than just the climate and biodiversity crisis. Although to be fair to him, if you really understand the biodiversity concept, it includes ecology.
20/

Hence all this fiddling of figures, so those trying to maintain their lifestyles, wealth, status and power, can pretend to be our saviours trying to fix the problem - can appear to have solutions (which are fake solutions - ironically to maintain their wealth and status).
21/

This is the naked, butt ugly, unvarnished reality. An utterly corrupt system, where our so-called leaders are little more than a corrupt bunch of fraudsters, acting out of pure self-interest, whilst pretending to care about everyone, simply to maintain the status quo.
22/

I was always told that my view of things was deeply cynical. Firstly, I am not cynical as I believe in people, and push back against those who say all humans are responsible. Secondly, time has proven this view of things correct.
23/

Well, what are we going to do about it? The ball is in our court, we are many, and those driving this crisis and obstructing change for the better, are few. We are only trapped in a hopeless situation if we continue to believe the bullshit we have been gaslit with.
24/

@GeorgeMonbiot @GretaThunberg @GreenRupertRead @ClimateHuman @ClimateDad77 @KevinClimate @KateRaworth @ProfSteveKeen @NaomiOreskes @ClimateBen @JKSteinberger @DoctorVive @ChrisGPackham @vanessa_vash @Fridays4future @CarolineLucas @WaterVole @joshual951

@threadreaderapp Please unroll?