Trump's lawyers filed their response to the DOJ's 11th circuit appeal in the Judge Cannon special master case.

Here's Trump's response: …dn-prod.news-engineering.aws.wapo.pub/publish_docume…

Shall we read it together?🤓

We left off with the DOJ giving Kash Patel use immunity to secure his testimony. . .
1/
Wait, what's use immunity? Here's a quick explainer⤵️ (This is from my blog)

Trump has an uphill battle here because the 11th circuit has already sided with the DOJ once, and allowed the DOJ to continue its criminal investigation as this appeal is pending.

2/ Image
So here we go. It's 67 pages, so if you like reading legal briefs, this is your moment.

They're trying to argue that the 11th Circuit doesn't have jurisdiction to hear this appeal at all because the appointment of a special master wasn't a final, appealable order.

3/ Image
The problem is they already lost once on this argument with the preliminary injunction issue, so they'll lose again.

Then they argue that Judge Cannon didn't "abuse her discretion" with the special master order.

"Abuse of discretion" is just the legal standard. . .

4/
Judges have a lot of discretion. To overturn certain kinds of order on appeal, you have to show that they abused that discretion.

No surprise, Trump's main argument is that he had full authority to keep or declassify these documents.

5/
Here is the theory of his case (#1) Trump had the authority to designate any of his records as 'personal.'

Therefore, according to Trump, the dispute is over whether or not these records are personal or presidential. (#2)

6/ ImageImage
See what his lawyers are trying to do?

How cases are framed matters. The DOJ says this is a stolen documents case. Trump stole documents. End of story.

Trump says, "Not so fast. I can't steal personal documents so the issue is whether they were presidential or personal."

7/
He will lose. It's absurd to think that nuclear secrets are personal.

Yesterday a Florida court sanctioned his lawyers for that frivolous RICA case against Hillary Clinton and the DOJ.

This is a losing argument and fails the laugh test, but it isn't frivolous.

8/
(The laugh test is known to criminal defense lawyers everywhere.)

He acknowledges is a procedure for declassifying documents, but says as president, he had final authority over everyone involved in the process, so had authority to circumvent the process any way he chose.

9/
He returns to his greatest hits: This is a PRA (presidential records act) matter, so the remedy was a civil suit, not a criminal suit.

Again, this is an attempt to frame the issue as a dispute under the PRA instead of a former guy walking off with government documents.

10/
Notice how smoothly his lawyers (Trusty & Kise) transition from "the president can do whatever he wants" to "Trump is a private citizen entitled to protection from government abuse." (1)

Apparently a former president now a private citizen creates "special circumstances."(2)
11/ Image
He argues that all records are presumptively personal and because he didn't return them, they are presumptively his and therefore he has a possessory interest in them and it's the government's burden to prove they were NOT personal.

12/ Image
He claims that because he remains politically active, a criminal inquiry or indictment harms him by harming his reputation.

You have to give his lawyers credit for their nerve in advancing that argument with a straight face.

13/ Image
Basically, this brief was cut-and-pasted from Trump's earlier briefs, with the claim that the 11th circuit doesn't have the authority to review the special master case until the entire case is completed more fully fleshed out.

14/
The 11th Circuit already found (in deciding the stay issue) that Trump is likely to lose this appeal on the merits.

I do not expect the DOJ's appeal to break Trump's losing streak.

15/

The DOJ filed and won a motion to expedite the appeal.

DOJ's reply is due Nov. 17.
Oral arguments will be soon after.
I'd say a decision this month.

If the DOJ wins this appeal, the entire case is thrown out. It's as if it never happened . . .

16/
. . .with one exception: Team Trump, knowing Trump was under criminal investigation, made the unbelievably stupid decision to file this action and tick off the prosecutors.

Pro tip: If you're under criminal investigation, don't go out of your way to tick off the prosecutors.
17/

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Teri Kanefield

Teri Kanefield Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Teri_Kanefield

Nov 12
I don't believe Trump actually thinks he'll innoculate himself from prosecution by declaring himself a candidate.

I believe it's a way to keep himself at the center stage of the GOP by presenting himself as the target of left-wing radical hated.

It will be his rallying cry.
Another common talking point is that Trump files legal actions with the goal of creating delays. This projects onto Trump rational thought process that makes sense to people. (Normal people projecting normalcy.)

He uses court filings to create a narrative . . .
. . .The election fraud cases was where he created the "I won" narrative.

It doesn't matter if he loses. He just blames the courts. The narrative sticks.

This past year, in his court filings, he argued consistently that the DOJ is targeting him because he's the leading GOP.
Read 4 tweets
Nov 6
This week's blog post is in two parts. First, I explain what it means that Kash Patel was given limited use immunity for his appearance before the grand jury.

Then I offered some ruminations about the coming midterms and told some personal stories. . . .
terikanefield.com/reflections-on…
. . . about my own volunteer work as a voter protection lawyer.

(Because I'm always posting my to-list list and telling people to get involved, one of my readers suggested that I talk about what I do.)

terikanefield.com/things-to-do/
Here you go. One of my poll observing adventures.

Ah. The lettering is too small. Better just to click through and read.

terikanefield.com/reflections-on…
As you'll see from the story, I don't intimidate easily💪 .

Oh yeah, and poll workers are American heroes.
Read 6 tweets
Nov 5
Hi, everyone,

I just joined Mastodon.

@Teri_Kanefield@mstdn.social

I had a hard time figuring it out. Then I found this button: joinmastodon.org. I picked "social" and was told there was a waitlist, so I applied and was admitted 12 hours later.
My plan right now is to try to cross-post on Mastodon, Counter Social, and here.

Sometimes I think, "No, Musk is not going to drive Twitter into a brick wall." Other times I think, "OMG he's driving Twitter into a brick wall."
The best way to keep in touch with me is through my (always free) blog.

Subscribe here: eepurl.com/h4xCMr

If Twitter gets to the point where I can't read my mentions, that's where I'll answer questions.
Read 5 tweets
Nov 4
Kash Patel testified yesterday before the grand jury. The first time he was there he took the 5th. This time around, with use immunity conferred upon him, he had to answer questions.

It seems like what prosecutors are doing . . .
cnn.com/2022/11/04/pol…
. . . is trying to get to the bottom of Trump's bogus "I declassified everything" defense.

Why?

Because good prosecutors want all the facts now. They don't want any surprises later. For how that works, see:
terikanefield.com/all-new-doj-in…

Correct. He preferred to take the Fifth and not say anything. That way he could protect Trump.

Now he has to testify truthfully.

The DOJ wants to flush out the bogus "declassified" defense now.
Read 9 tweets
Nov 3
To clarify what Kash Patel's use immunity means:

It's solid immunity for anything he says truthfully, but it is not blanket immunity from prosecution.

Derivative use immunity immunizes Patel for his statements and means he can't take the 5th . . .

1/
The prosecution can still build a case against him from evidence entirely walled off from his statements.

But (h/t @arenella1 ) if indicted, he can request a hearing to make sure his statements weren't used to build the case.

If he commits perjury . . .

2/
. . . of course, he loses his use immunity and he can be prosecuted for his statements.

This is a sign that the prosecutors are not interested in getting him. They want his truthful testimony.

They're going after someone else and that someone can only be Trump.

3/
Read 4 tweets
Nov 3
The evolution of this is interesting.

Prior to the pandemic, Republicans had a get-out-the-vote advantage, partly because they tended to vote early and by mail. Focusing on early voting is an advantage because you have 3 weeks to get your people to the polls . . .

1/
. . . and toward election day you can focus your resources on the people who haven't voted.

Raffensperger said Trump "depressed his own turnout" in Georgia by claiming that mail-in balloting was ridden with fraud. Republicans who ordinarily voted by mail didn't vote.

2/
On election day, they'll have to crawl out of a hole, which can be done but is harder.

Now, instead of trying to correct this, Republicans are going with it in order to claim fraud.

3/
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(